Re: Cannot specify ntpd binary in ports with ntpd startup file.

2018-08-30 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Tue, 28 Aug 2018 17:34:08 -0700 (PDT) Dan Mahoney (Gushi) wrote: > 1) Got the version wrong. I'm on 10.4. > > 2) Forgot a subject. Whoops. > > 3) Forgot to cc maintainer. Doh! > > -Dan > > On Tue, 28 Aug 2018, Dan Mahoney (Gushi) wrote: > > > Hey all, > > > > Funny question. I'm on Fre

Re: RUN_DEPENDS and portmaster

2018-09-19 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 14:14:42 +0200 (CEST) Marco Beishuizen wrote: > On Wed, 19 Sep 2018, the wise Thomas Mueller wrote: > > > This discussion of portmaster prompts me to ask, what is the status > > of portupgrade? > > > > I used portupgrade at first but subsequently switched to > > portmaster.

nvidia-driver failed after 11.1 to 11.2 update

2018-10-04 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
I recently updated from 11.1 to 11.2 and the nvidia-driver failed to initialize afterwards. Switching from 'quarterly' to 'latest' didn't help, but reinstalling from the port fixed it. Perhaps the 'latest' version needs to be rebuilt against a newer kernel, or have I done something strange? __

Re: Spamassassin/GeoIP2

2019-03-09 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Sat, 9 Mar 2019 16:52:01 +0100 Xavier wrote: > Hello, > > Since GeoIP is deprecated, I installed GeoIP2 instead. > > Now, sa-update fails with> plugin: failed to parse plugin (from @INC): > Bareword "GEOIP_MEMORY_CACHE"... GeoIP2 does require extra configuration. You need to download a datab

Re: MariaDB 10.3.17

2019-08-04 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Sun, 4 Aug 2019 13:00:52 -0600 The Doctor wrote: > MariaDB 10.3.17 is out? > > Who is supposed to be looking after this port? > cd /usr/ports// make maintainer ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinf

Re: good gui bit-torrent client?

2020-02-29 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 18:49:02 -0500 Robert Huff wrote: > I used to use azureus/vuze, but it hasn't been maintained is > quite a while. I used azureus a long time ago, and liked it, but IIRC at the time it didn't scale very well when managing many torrents and its java dependencies were a pai

Re: Aria2 and magnets

2020-03-05 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 17:19:06 -0700 @lbutlr wrote: > Brand new install of aria2 and I tried to grab the FreBSD 12.1 amd64 > image via a magnet link: ... > After about 30 minutes the only thing I get is updates showing 0 > Bytes downloaded. ... > > Downloading a torrent file, in this case Ubuntu ser

Re: cad/gmsh port

2020-03-13 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Thu, 12 Mar 2020 16:19:20 + Montgomery-Smith, Stephen wrote: > For some reason fetch freezes when the ports tries to build cad/gmsh. > But if I download the tarball via my web browser, it works. It also happens with wget and curl. What's particularly odd is that fetch took 2 hours to t

Re: [HEADS UP] Planned deprecation of portsnap

2020-08-09 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Sun, 9 Aug 2020 16:43:28 +0100 Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 09/08/2020 07:03, Stefan Ehmann wrote: > > I usually run `pkg version` to see what packages have changed. > > > > Previously, that was a more or less instant operation, now it takes > > over 100 seconds. The problem is that /usr/ports/I

Re: portsnap

2020-12-30 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Wed, 30 Dec 2020 11:02:55 -0700 Edward Sanford Sutton, III wrote: > portsnap is a shell script where fetch is used for downloads. It uses fetch for some things, but fetching the actual updates uses phttpget(8) which supports pipelined HTTP requests. _

Re: bogus warning from pkg

2021-02-15 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 12:39:13 -0800 Steve Kargl wrote: > BTW, there is no documentation as what 'pkg bootstrap -f' > does. In particular, the -f option is no described. > >From pkg(8) (in 12.2): bootstrap This is for compatibility with the pkg(7) bootstrapper. If

Re: Python 2.7 removal outline

2021-03-26 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 13:55:33 +1100 (EST) Dave Horsfall wrote: > On Thu, 25 Mar 2021, George Mitchell wrote: > > >> [...] it is really not for everybody to use overlays in current > >> state (overlays are poor documented at least). [...] > > > > Until this thread I had never heard of them.

Re: About Gxneur

2015-06-21 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Sun, 21 Jun 2015 16:48:39 -0400 kpn...@pobox.com wrote: > On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 11:33:08AM +0300, ??? ??? wrote: > > Hello! > > > > I apologize for my English, I use a translator. > > I noticed that when I install gxneur is one problem. Xneur > > installed and working properly. But g

Re: www/squid's cache dir

2015-07-14 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 12:33:33 +0300 Pavel Timofeev wrote: > Hi! > > A question was born in my mind about www/squid port: > > Do we really need a separate /var/squid dir for 'cache' and always > empty 'logs' subdirs? > Squid's logs are really in /var/log/squid, not in /var/squid/logs. > > So I th

Re: www/squid's cache dir

2015-07-15 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 21:39:39 -0700 (MST) timp wrote: > > Squid can use more than one cache directory, so it makes sense to > > have the default cache directory as a sub-directory of squid/. > > Additional cache dirs can be created manually by user in /var/squid, I > agree. Like /var/squid/cach

Re: www/squid's cache dir

2015-07-15 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 04:25:56 -0700 (MST) timp wrote: > Ok, so you don't see the difference too, do you? Actually I do see the difference - I think the current layout is better. My point was that "I can't see any difference" isn't a good argument for making disruptive change. I think it's obvio

Re: rc script problem - pidfile not being recognised

2015-09-11 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 15:42:18 +0100 (BST) Kevin Golding wrote: > I've been trying to work on a new port and it's my first that uses an > rc script so I've been expecting a few bumps, but there's one thing I > can't seem to fix and it's a blocker. I can't stop the daemon! > > It dopes create a pidf

Re: rc script problem - pidfile not being recognised

2015-09-11 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:55:58 +0100 (BST) Kevin Golding wrote: > - Original Message - > > From: "RW via freebsd-ports" > > Sent: Friday, 11 September, 2015 4:18:50 PM > > > > did you set the command_interpreter variable, probably you need > &

Re: rc script problem - pidfile not being recognised

2015-09-11 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 09:46:31 -0700 (PDT) Roger Marquis wrote: > RW via freebsd-ports wrote: > > It needs both. It won't use just the pid file because the pid > > might have been reassigned to another process if the original daemon > > died without deleting its pid fi

Re: rc script problem - pidfile not being recognised

2015-09-12 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 01:46:23 +0200 Michelle Sullivan wrote: > Roger Marquis wrote: > > RW via freebsd-ports wrote: > >> It needs both. It won't use just the pid file because the pid > >> might have been reassigned to another process if the original > >>

Re: rc script problem - pidfile not being recognised

2015-09-14 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 08:02:11 -0700 (PDT) Roger Marquis wrote: > RW via freebsd-ports wrote: > > You'd rather an rc script fails at run-time and shuts down the wrong > > daemon than fail when the script is being developed? > > It's not so much where the script

Re: distfiles cleaner

2015-10-19 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 14:16:37 +0200 Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Hi ports@ > What is the modern equivalent of this obsolete stuff please ? > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=portsclean&sektion=1&apropos=0&manpath=FreeBSD+9.0-RELEASE+and+Ports > portsclean --distclean > Clean out

Re: ccache's cleanup algorithm

2015-11-03 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Tue, 03 Nov 2015 07:26:46 -0600 Scott Bennett wrote: > In ccache's cleanup.c module, the comments say that files are > deleted from the cache on a LRU basis. However, the code refers to > mtime, not atime, so it appears that ccache is, in reality, using a > Least Recently *Modified* basis

Re: Is it possible to specify which files are backed up to MASTER_SITE_BACKUP?

2015-11-30 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Sun, 29 Nov 2015 21:57:17 -0800 Yuri wrote: > I have the complex fetch stage which takes one set of distfiles, and > produces another distfile, only that distfile is used in build. > > There is the variable CKSUMFILES that controls which distfiles are > included in distinfo (in my case all o

Re: Deriving base port/package names

2016-04-08 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 06:29:31 -0700 (PDT) Roger Marquis wrote: > Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > > what would be a proper sort of sed command to extract > > _just_ the port/package names, without the version numbers > > attached? > > This has changed in the past so may not currently be 100% correct

Re: Ports tree gone unstable?

2016-04-28 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 23:48:43 -0700 (PDT) Don Lewis wrote: > I'd lose many hours of potential build time. Because of the > infrequent upgrades I would have to deal with all of the intervening > special cases in UPDATING that accumulated between upgrades, and the > portupgrade -fr and -a options d

Re: Poudriere question

2016-05-10 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Mon, 9 May 2016 20:15:12 +0200 Guido Falsi wrote: > On 05/09/16 19:52, Fernando Apesteguía wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Is it safe to use different invocations of poudriere concurrently > > for different jails but using the same ports collection? > > > > Yes it is, or at least should be. >

Re: Poudriere question

2016-05-10 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Tue, 10 May 2016 14:35:35 +0200 Guido Falsi wrote: > On 05/10/16 13:35, RW via freebsd-ports wrote: > > On Mon, 9 May 2016 20:15:12 +0200 > > Guido Falsi wrote: > > > >> On 05/09/16 19:52, Fernando Apesteguía wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>

Re: Poudriere question

2016-05-10 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Tue, 10 May 2016 17:05:20 +0200 Guido Falsi wrote: > Never seen poudriere remove distfiles, nor the ports tree do that, > what change are you referring to? > The problem isn't anything to do with poudriere. It was caused by a change to the checksum target in ports. The checksum of a pre-exis

Re: Firefox 47.0 hangs when accessing cnn.com

2016-06-08 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 20:18:52 -0700 Kevin Oberman wrote: > You should be able to use ports-mgmt/portdowngrade. This assumes that > you still have the distribution file, as I suspect that it's no longer > available for download from Mozilla. Check, though. You can get many old versions: http://down

Re: GeForce GTX 750 Ti upgraded to unsupported

2016-09-09 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 15:54:17 -0700 Russell L. Carter wrote: > Greetings, > > Since I upgraded to 11/stable from 10/stable, it appears that my video > card is no longer supported by either nvidia-driver or > nvidia-driver-340: > > 77.208] (WW) NV: Ignoring unsupported device 0x10de1380 (GM107 >

Re: FreeBSD Port: devel/libsysinfo

2016-09-21 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 18:03:37 -0400 Robert Burmeister wrote: > FreeBSD 10.3 i386. > > lxde-meta 1.0_7, "meta-port" of the LXDE desktop > x11/lxde-meta > dependes on lxpanel 0.6.2_1, Lightweight X11 desktop panel > x11/lxpanel > which depends on libsysinfo 0.0.2_1, GNU libc's sysinfo port for > Fre

Re: harder and harder to avoid pkg

2016-10-13 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 11:59:47 -0700 Julian Elischer wrote: > As the number of dependencies between packages get ever higher, it > becomes more and more difficult to compile packages and the > dependence on binary precompiled packages is increased. However > binary packages are unsuitable for some

Re: The ports collection has some serious issues

2016-12-08 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 05:16:24 + Daniil Berendeev wrote: > 1) portmaster is not nice for the user. > If it comes over an error even in one little tiny port that is a > dependency for something bigger , it will abort its work and leave all > the other ports not updated. So, if you try to to do `po

Re: mail/mixmaster port issue

2016-12-10 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Sat, 10 Dec 2016 15:36:35 +0100 Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > > > > My portmaster is stopping at mail/mixmaster saying broken > > > > cannot find file > > > > > > > > Running FreeBSD 11. > > > > > > > > I checked and mixmaster is still avilable at sourceforge. > > > > > > > > Please fix. >

Re: The ports collection has some serious issues

2016-12-12 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 19:42:07 -0700 Janky Jay, III wrote: > Hello scratch, > > On 12/11/2016 03:35 PM, scratch65...@att.net wrote: > > I have to admit that I avoid ports if at all possible because > > I've hardly ever been able to do a build that ran to completion. > > There's always some piece o

Re: The ports collection has some serious issues

2016-12-15 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 07:40:46 -0700 (MST) Warren Block wrote: > On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Matt Smith wrote: > > > On Dec 08 05:16, Daniil Berendeev wrote: > >> > >> Although portmaster is not releated to the FreeBSD project and is > >> an outside tool, there aren't any alternatives from the project >

Re: mail/spamassassin config option AS_ROOT is confusing

2016-12-20 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Tue, 20 Dec 2016 11:53:43 -0700 Mike Brown wrote: > The AS_ROOT option in the mail/spamassassin port is really confusing > to me. Given that its description is "Run spamd as root > (recommended)", what actually happens is somewhat bonkers: > > The main spamd process always runs as root. If AS_

Re: portsnap temporary files

2017-01-06 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Sat, 7 Jan 2017 06:51:44 +1100 (EST) Dave Horsfall wrote: > Is there some reason why portsnap cannot clean > up /var/db/portsnap/files? I've just had to remove a zillion of them, > a bunch at a time because "rm" choked on the arg list. If you mean files under /var/db/portsnap/files/ then these

Re: ports and dependency hell

2017-02-08 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Wed, 8 Feb 2017 16:03:56 +0800 Julian Elischer wrote: > On 8/2/17 3:17 am, Grzegorz Junka wrote: > > > > On 07/02/2017 18:03, Julian Elischer wrote: > >> This is a serious post on a serious issue that ports framework > >> people seem unaware of. > >> (...) > >> > >> The call "It just works

Re: devel/check

2017-02-11 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 09:08:29 +1000 Andy Farkas wrote: > On 12/02/2017 08:59, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > On 11/02/2017 22:57, Andy Farkas wrote: > >> The -f flag is not mentioned in the man page for pkg(8). > >> > > Try reading the pkg-delete(8) man page. > > > > To be fair, the pkg(8) man pa

Re: Port management tools (was: Status of synth)

2017-02-16 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 09:19:24 -0500 George Mitchell wrote: > > Yeah, I really like this a lot more than going through all the > > config screens. Back when I used portupgrade, I found that it was > > too easy to accidentally set some option for a port to a > > non-default value where it would per

Re: Do I need /var/db/portsnap/distfiles and /usr/port/distfiles?

2017-02-16 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Fri, 17 Feb 2017 08:32:17 +1100 (EST) Dave Horsfall wrote: > There is only the one FreeBSD box in my stable, hence I don't need to > build packages for others. It's to to do with whether you use ports, rather than if you build package for other boxes. > It's a somewhat minimalist box (all

Re: spamassassin does not list all required packages (3.4.1_9)

2017-02-25 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Sat, 25 Feb 2017 12:34:54 -0800 Chris H wrote: > On Sat, 25 Feb 2017 11:50:50 -0500 (EST) "Igor R." > wrote > > > Hello! > > > > As far as I can tell, spamassassin-3.4.1_9 does not list all > > required p5 packages, which results in 3 error messages > > in /var/log/maillog upon starting the

Re: spamassassin does not list all required packages (3.4.1_9)

2017-02-25 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 00:06:56 + RW wrote: > I'm not seeing these errors, but I'm guessing that they are caused by > the OP using an internationalized domain name somewhere in the SA > configuration. Most likely the name of server that spamd runs on. Or maybe an accidental non-ascii character

Re: portmaster installation trampling on my binary packages???

2017-03-19 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Sun, 19 Mar 2017 18:35:26 + Ethan Grammatikidis wrote: > Hi. I'm quite new to FreeBSD. I'm getting a system up & running > slowly, working around my chronic fatigue. Today I'm updating for the > first time. Base system and pkg update appeared to go well. I haven't > rebooted, wanting to get

Re: portmaster installation trampling on my binary packages???

2017-03-19 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Sun, 19 Mar 2017 21:57:48 + Ethan Grammatikidis wrote: > I'm not sure I understand. Are "latest" and "quarterly" ports trees? > The default packages for releases are built from a series of branches of the main ports tree that are made split-off every three months, and then just get securi

Re: opera browser crash and recovery

2017-03-21 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 06:52:22 -0700 (PDT) Jeffrey Bouquet wrote: > About once a year, sometimes more often, sometimes less often, opera > browser thinks it is not installed, and wishes to reinstall, placing > a plain-vanilla version to where years of customization had > comfortably attuned the bro

Re: pkg and packages

2017-05-04 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Thu, 04 May 2017 08:09:47 -0400 scratch65...@att.net wrote: > > I can't imagine what code could possibly be in thunar and samba > that the xfce desktop would need, particularly since the desktop > is very simple, and also because I've never got samba > functionality for free after installing xf

Re: pkg and packages

2017-05-04 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Thu, 04 May 2017 07:43:30 -0600 Jim Trigg wrote: > ISTR that it's Thunar that depends on Samba by default. Yes it looks like it came in when Thunar defaulted to depending on the "Trash Panel Applet Plugin". Unfortunately the options framework caches old defaults. __

Re: pkg and packages

2017-05-08 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Mon, 8 May 2017 09:29:47 -0700 Freddie Cash wrote: > ​Samba + GVFS + Thunar doesn't make your FreeBSD filesystems > available from Windows machines. It makes your Windows file shares > available on FreeBSD, and they show up in Thunar just like other > folders. GVFS uses libsmbclient and/or s

Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version

2017-06-23 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 22:03:35 -0400 Baho Utot wrote: > The pre-compiled packages is what drove me to build the entire system > as it gave me a broken system that would not work and upon getting it > to function would/**/spontaneous reboot. My hand built packages > stopped that. > > I have built

Re: Question on Amavis and ramdisk

2017-08-21 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 14:47:43 +0200 Willem Jan Withagen wrote: > Hi, > > In the amavis rc.d file is noted: > "" > "WARNING: using ramdisk is reported to be unstable and" > "thus it is highly recommended to be turned off." > "=

Re: Synth and circular dependencies

2017-08-21 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 13:19:24 + Thomas Mueller wrote: > But on this computer, no such system crashes, but I ran into circular > dependencies Try removing any port options that aren't absolutely essential. > It seems the ports go overboard with an awful lot of dependencies, of > which not al

Re: Synth and circular dependencies

2017-08-22 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Tue, 22 Aug 2017 06:34:15 + Thomas Mueller wrote: > It was very disconcerting when I would do a massive portupgrade > before going to bed and subsequently find portupgrade stopped for an > options dialog. FWIW portupgrade has a -c option to avoid that. _

Re: Status of portupgrade and portmaster?

2017-09-30 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Sat, 30 Sep 2017 10:34:11 + Carmel NY wrote: > I have just the opposite experience. With "portupgrade" I was getting > all too many dependencies installed that I had no use for. I > personally appreciate synth's finer-grain installation philosophy. But presumably that's just portupgrade i

Re: Status of portupgrade and portmaster?

2017-10-01 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Sun, 01 Oct 2017 12:26:25 +0200 Vlad K. wrote: > Another problem is poudriere's inability to reuse already installed > packages, if they're a dependency for something being built by it. > Personally I'd never use that option, as I want clean, isolated > rebuilds of everything affected, but I

Re: Status of portupgrade and portmaster?

2017-10-01 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Sun, 01 Oct 2017 20:53:29 +0200 Vlad K. wrote: > On 2017-10-01 18:24, RW via freebsd-ports wrote: > > > > Do you mean as opposed to installing the dependencies from the > > repository, or are you saying that it rebuilds them? > > Poudriere builds isolated, in

Bogofilter contrib scripts treated as docs

2017-11-06 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
I just noticed that the bogofilter perl and shell scripts from the contrib directory (see below) only get installed if bogofilter is built with the DOCS option. .for i in bfproxy.pl bogofilter-milter.pl bogo.R bogofilter-qfe.sh \ mime.get.rfc822.pl parmtest.sh printmaildir.pl \ bo

Re: Bogofilter contrib scripts treated as docs

2017-11-09 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Thu, 9 Nov 2017 23:12:48 +0100 Matthias Andree wrote: > Am 06.11.2017 um 20:19 schrieb RW: > > > > I just noticed that the bogofilter perl and shell scripts from the > > contrib directory (see below) only get installed if bogofilter is > > built with the DOCS option. > > > > > > .for i in bf

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

2017-12-10 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Sun, 10 Dec 2017 10:10:30 -0800 Kevin Oberman wrote: > Strongly agree! Support ofr some basics like .forward is really a > requirement. It is used for too many "normal" mail operations > including private dropmail or procmail setups as well as forwarding > to a smartmail system. This is actua

Re: Flavor part of package origin?

2017-12-11 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 14:38:59 +0100 Mathieu Arnold wrote: > Le 11/12/2017 à 10:12, Stefan Esser a écrit : > > $ pkg info -o '*setuptools*' > > py27-setuptools-36.5.0 devel/py-setuptools@py27 > > py36-setuptools-36.5.0 devel/py-setuptools@py36 > > > I really do not like the look

Re: Suggesting new virtual categories: physics and chemistry

2017-12-14 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 08:47:38 -0800 Yuri wrote: > Some ports naturally fall under these categories: > > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D13481 Science isn't particularly large: $ for d in `make -V SUBDIR` ;do echo "`find $d/ -maxdepth 1 -type d |wc -l` $d" ;done |sort -n | tail -n 30 179

Re: portsnap not honoring WORKDIR and PORTSDIR?

2018-04-21 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Sat, 21 Apr 2018 16:49:13 -0600 Gary Aitken wrote: > Is portsnap supposed to honor WORKDIR and PORTSDIR? > > These are defined in /etc/portsnap.conf, and it's not clear to me > whether they are honored only via the .conf file or whether they > are supposed to be honored from the environment as