easiest way to "roll back" to firefox version 21?

Hi all, Is there an "easy" way to install the port/package for Firefox version 21? I'm trying to install version 22 out of a fresh ports tree and having nothing but trouble with it. 1) The "Show All Bookmarks" feature that brings up another dialog allowing you to manipulate current bookmarks

nspluginwrapper + native firefox 2 + flash9?

Hi everybody, there wasn't chatter about this when sent to questions@, so I'm trying the ports list. I've been struggling with this for the past day or so and the archives + google aren't coming up with much except for other people's success stories. I recently ditched using the linux-firefox port

packages available after Xorg update?

Hi folks, I've been following along with the ports freeze and upgrade procedure for Xorg 7.2, etc. I was reading UPDATING and saw When packages are available (wait for the announcement on ports@), you may prefer to use precompiled packages to speed up the process: # portupgrade -aP Has thi

does the java/jdk15 port build under 7.0-CURRENT?

Hello all, I recently built up a new box running 7.0-CURRENT (to get support for devices on a new motherboard I bought). Everything's been going great thus far (kudo's to all involved!) but as I was building the java/jdk15 port tonight I ran into a problem. I had previously built this on a 6.2-STAB

Re: does the java/jdk15 port build under 7.0-CURRENT?

[ On Thursday, June 21, Manfred Antar wrote: ] > > I built it last week on CURRENT,but i uninstalled the old version i had and > used the linux-sun-jdk15 to build it. Then uninstalled the linux-sun-jdk15. > you need to load the linux and linprocs kernel module for the build. I > haven't tried t

continued trouble compiling java/jdk15 on 7.0-CURRENT

Hello ports, I'm having continued trouble getting the java/jkd15 port to compile under 7.0-CURRENT (kernel/world as of Jun 22 12:56:07 MST 2007). My ports tree was CVSup'ed 8/8/2007. I manually fetched the tarballs the port requires and it churns and churns ultimately ending with the following: <<

trouble with ImageMagick self tests

hello, I've been trying to upgrade ImageMagick for several days now but with no success. I'm on a -current system built about a month ago (Aug 31 19:52:08 MST 2007). I am using the "default" config of having TTF on, and FPX off. I've even tried "portupgrade -fR ImageMagick" thinking that one of th

Re: trouble with ImageMagick self tests

[ On Sunday, September 30, Philipp Ost wrote: ] > > I disabled perl-support and all was fine... > > For the sake of completeness: H. Well, I depend quite heavily on the Perl support :( (and had already disabled FXP). Does anybody have any experience on 6.2-STABLE or something other tha

Re: ImageMagick problems

[ On Monday, October 1, Mikhail Teterin wrote: ] > понеділок 01 жовтень 2007 05:01 по, Paul Schmehl Ви написали: > > The link has only the results of configure... Can you, please, post the > entire > output of: > > make clean build > seems that an update of kernel/world is what was needed t

Re: The scandalous status of linux-flashplugin9

[ On Monday, October 8, Scot Hetzel wrote: ] > The port is not broken as the flash9 port is not compiled, it just > installs the linux flash9 binary. What is broken is the linux > emulation on FreeBSD < 7. Work is underway to improve the linux > emulation in -CURRENT. > > I agree the port should