Doug Barton wrote:
> > Should this new category come to being, the self identified ports in misc
> > would get relocated. All other ports would simply be extended with the new
> > virtual category name.
> You've probably already covered this, but are you making a distinction
> between ports that ar
Dan Langille wrote:
> "This is to warn you that Bacula will probably not be able to be
> compiled and run with encryption on Release 7 of FreeBSD. This is
> because the version of pthreads in that release has pthread_t defined as
> a structure, which is incompatible with OpenSSL."
The prope
Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote:
> >> Choosing "%" to differentiate it, however, was a bad idea. It would
> >> be better to use a simple underscore.
> > Why is % any worse than an underscore? As I explained earlier, fetch has no
> > problem dealing with it. The errors people were posting are server-s
Hi Arjan,
Arjan van Leeuwen wrote:
> Since I upgraded to FreeBSD 7.2 (from 7.1), my Pike installation has been
> hanging regularly. When this happens, there is always one pike process in
> [wait] state and one in [umtxn] (from top).
I use Pike frequently on 7.2 systems, but haven't seen this prob
Heino Tiedemann wrote:
> I installed the port www/firefox35. After installation I tried to
> start it
> It core dumps 'every time' (100% reproducable).
Did you load sem(4)? To quote UPDATING:
If your Firefox crashes with the following message while viewing a
HTML5 page: "Bad system call (core
Greetings,
Herby Vojčík wrote:
> I hope I am not very annoying, but I'd like to ask when will the port of
> 3.1 be ready. It features star packages with new clauses, which 3.0.5
> cannot read, and better compstibility with other Smalltalk is also nice a
> feature. I was pretty disappointed that
per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> Given the backwards compatibility issues, might it be worthwhile
> to create a new smalltalk31 or smalltalk-devel port, or rename
> the current port to something like smalltalk30x, so that the
> older version can remain available for use with older programs?
Well, 3.
James Bailie wrote:
> I'm the maintainer of lang/munger, and it has been marked broken on
> Sparc64 because it won't link. I need to see the compiler output
> to fix the problem, but I don't have access to this architecture.
There might be some useful logs on pointyhat in this case. Check out
htt
Alberto Villa wrote:
> On Thursday 10 June 2010 17:39:52 Anonymous wrote:
> > IANAL, but I think LGPL3 is applicable here, too. So, I've tried to set
> > LICENSE= LGPL21+
> > but it doesn't work. I've figured this will work
> > LICENSE= LGPL21 LGPL3
> > LICENSE_COMB= dual
> > Is this correct
Joe wrote:
> I can not figure out just what the author was trying to say with
> "output of shar `find port_dir`"
If your port files are stored in the subdirectory 'newport' then
you may issue the command
shar `find newport` > file.shar
This creates the 'file.shar' file, which contains a s
Anonymous wrote:
> >> Am I the only one that thinks it's odd that in 2010 we're still using
> >> executable scripts to distribute text files?
> > How would you do it differently?
> $ diff -upNr /nonexistent mynewport
I quite like this solution. It's a simple command, very similar to
what's used
Nikola Lečić wrote:
> Anyway, it wasn't clear from the bsd.licenses.mk that we should use
> 'multi' in situations of 'any later version'. This means that all
> licensing info of eg. GPL2+ ports must be updated when GPL4 appears...
No, we should not use this. Not just because of the potential of ha
er...@freebsd.org wrote:
> ** The following ports have a version number that sorts before a previous one
> **
> Please fix any errors as soon as possible.
>
> - *chinese/tin* : zh-tin-2.0.1_1 < zh-tin-2.0.1_4
> (master: news/tin)
>| revision 1.159
>| date: 2012/02/14 12:45:28; author:
Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
> >> What is the current ETA on when the ports freeze will end?
> > See the freebsd.org release pages
> I know you will kill me for this but the URL?
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.3R/schedule.html
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/7.0R/schedule.html
"Ports tree unfrozen
Stefan Sperling wrote:
> An alternative is to simply keep the last released version
> that had a sane license. AFAIK OpenBSD did that, see:
> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=119522869306969&w=2
Sounds like a fair solution.
Ciao,
Johan
pgpKKzw6X0dHN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Tobias Rehbein wrote:
> Or is there some way to use gpg without pinentry?
You could use security/gnupg1 instead (which is still developed, just
a seperate branch), which doens't require pinentry.
Ciao,
Johan
pgp2IwUtXegLB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi Julian,
Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> A 9.0-RELEASE ports fails on
> cd print/texinfo ; make fetch
> unless one imports newer values from current,
I copied the versions used by this port to my own server to prevent this
failure, specificially for the case that the primary sources updates the
Doug Barton wrote:
> Building texi2html without NLS results in this:
> texi2html
> Undefined subroutine &Locale::Messages::dgettext called at
> /usr/local/bin/texi2html line 29628.
Indeed, I can confirm that the application is currently unusable when
compiled without NLS support. Will report this
Doug Barton wrote:
> >> It would also be useful if you could make real options out of
> >> what you have in the file already.
> > Not sure what you mean by this: the options seem real enough.
> make config
> ===> No options to configure
The only relevant options are DOCS and NLS; they were never i
Johan van Selst wrote:
> Doug Barton wrote:
> > Building texi2html without NLS results in this:
> > texi2html
> > Undefined subroutine &Locale::Messages::dgettext called at
> > /usr/local/bin/texi2html line 29628.
> Indeed, I can confirm that the application is
Stephen Hurd wrote:
> Re: Previous, seems to be because of this line:
> INSTALLS_ICONS=yes
> Also, the hicolor-icon-theme run depend should likely be only in X11 as well.
You are right, well spotted. I'll update the port to correct this.
Regards,
Johan
pgpZ6H4k2az3K.pgp
Description: PG
Hi Mitja,
ajtiM wrote:
> In ports is texinfo-5.1 update but whenever is texinfo new version
> (update) I have a problem:
> print/texinfo-5.1 confilcts with texi2html-5.0 (installs files into
> the same place.
> Problematic: /usr/local/share/texinfo/init/book.init
This is curious: texinfo does not
Hi Baptiste,
Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> I finally got it. The bug is in the texinfo port: PORTDATA= *
> This globbing makes texinfo pick up all the files inside
> /usr/local/share/texinfo but if texi2html is installed before texinfo
> then it installs some files in that place, and those files are
cpghost wrote:
> Unfortunately, when OPTION iodbc is selected, the port now fails
> to compile:
Corrected now, thanks for reporting.
I have also disabled the optional Java interface (JPL) for now.
Will try and figure out how to get this working with varios JDKs
and add it as an option later.
Re
cpghost wrote:
> I've discovered the reason for this:
Ah, great. Now I can reproduce it as well. You are right, it is a hidden
dependency (with no sensible way of turning it off). I shall add your
patch with an explicit dependency on misc/ossp-uuid.
Thanks,
Johan
pgpQsPTrLwwJZ.pgp
Description:
Johan van Selst wrote:
> cpghost wrote:
> > I've discovered the reason for this:
> Ah, great. Now I can reproduce it as well. You are right, it is a hidden
> dependency (with no sensible way of turning it off). I shall add your
> patch with an explicit dependency on mis
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Mueller wrote:
> Trying to update devel/libtool, I get /usr/local/bin/libtoolize with 0 bytes.
> There is a message
> Shared object "libreadline.so.8" not found, required by "gawk"
[snip]
> It looks like devel/readline, maybe also lang/gawk, should be listed
> as a dependency f
Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> Hi joh...@freebsd.org ( cc ports@)
> as MAINTAINER= of editors/nvi-devel
> BROKEN= Unfetchable
>
> I have made my local distfile temporarily available here:
> http://berklix.com/~jhs/ftp/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/nvi-1.81.6.tar.bz2
> Please copy it somewhere & remov
Howard Goldstein wrote:
> Michael Grimm wrote:
>> The recent Perl-upgrade to 5.8.9 crashes innd (core dump) at start-up,
>> reproducible. I did re-compile all ports including inn, same result.
>> Then I removed Perl support during configuration, re-compiled, and now
>> innd starts and runs as
Hi Joe,
Joseph Oreste Bruni wrote:
> I see that you are the maintainer of the SKS package within the FreeBSD
> ports tree. I was wondering if you could add one of the patches that is
> present in the SKS revision control repository but has not yet made its
> way into a release.
Thanks. I'll ad
Thomas Abthorpe wrote:
> The gauntlet has been thrown down, who among you is prepared to pick it up?
Please, when volunteering to maintain up a port, also check the open
error reports and problem reports for this port - as listed on Portsmon,
http://portsmon.freebsd.org/ and other locations.
Tha
Jerry wrote:
> @${REINPLACE_CMD} -e
> 's|CONFIG_FILE=${CONFIG_FILE:-/etc/${SCRIPT_NAME}.conf}|CONFIG_FILE=${CONFIG_FILE:-/usr/local/etc/${SCRIPT_NAME}.conf}|g'
> ${WRKSRC}/${PORTNAME}.sh
>
> Syntax error: Unterminated quoted string
${..} will be interpreted by make - even when it is
Jerry wrote:
> Was this some sort of 'improvement' by the Bash developers, or is it
> an un-squashed bug?
It seems that this might actually be a feature.
Quoting the COMPAT document of bash4:
38. Since bash-4.0 now follows Posix rules for finding the closing delimiter
of a $() command substit
Gaye Abdoulaye Walsimou wrote:
> security/gnupg (or one dependance) need xorg now?
gnupg2 requires with a standard interface to read passphrases and
PIN codes (in combination with smartcards) in a secure way. For this
security/pinentry is needed. It comes in several flavours: curses, gtk,
gtk2
Hi Peter,
Dr. Peter Voigt wrote:
> So I played a bit and found that specifying more than one key fails,
[..]
> Is this related to GnuPG 2.0.24 or to the FreeBSD port? I can compare
> just with a GnuPG 2.0.23 under Linux. This version works as expected.
This is a confirmed bug in the GnuPG 2.0.24
Hi Jens,
Jens K. Loewe wrote:
> I'm currently trying to replace OpenSSL on my server by LibreSSL
> (security/libressl). Anyway, I found some ports struggling to compile
> with it, including (but not limited to) www/w3m,
> security/p5-Net-SSLeay (which seems to query the OpenSSL version
> directly?
Siju George wrote:
> I installed Subversion on FreeBSD 6.1 from ports.
> Started svnserve to listen on 3690
> How do I make it listen on tcp4.
You can add the option --listen-host=0 to listen on IPv4 only.
Greetings,
Johan
pgpaeaEpCbpGo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Vizeli Pascal wrote:
> I've problem with send-pr.
> Send-pr doesn't send the message and I don't know why.
This might be a mail configuration problem (on either end).
You can try the webinterface, http://www.freebsd.org/send-pr.html
> In the attachment is a new port (gpac mp4box).
I don't see an
38 matches
Mail list logo
