ssions in octal rather
than the '..rwx...' from ls -l; the permissions is the third group of numbers.
Jimmy
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 03:12:08PM -0500, sindrome wrote:
> Jerry is right. I have it set to 1777 too and still receive the error
>
>
> On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 2:17 PM
Just out of curiosity, what is your PATH set to in whatever console/terminal
window before you run portupgrade ( echo $PATH )?
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 08:03:09AM -0500, sindrome wrote:
> Looks like a step in the right direction. How do I troubleshoot to figure
> out what application is appending/
Ok, I've discovered a combination of things that will reproduce that message,
and it REALLY does come down to NOT HAVING '.' IN YOUR PATH, especially for
user root.
If I don't have '.' in my path, I can "cd" to any directory and Ruby will not
complain when I run the system() command (or the equiv
individually...
(if they're going to wait for another 2 1/2 years / 1000+ patches
for their next release, they might consider it)
Jimmy
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 08:20:19AM +0800, Denny Lin wrote:
> On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 01:29:09AM +0300, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
> > As far as I know FreeBSD
+
+ARCHFLAG =
+ifeq ($(ARCH_DATA_MODEL), 64)
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 07:45:30AM -0500, Jimmy Kelley wrote:
> There is a bug in the latest openjdk7 (7.55.13_3,1).
> You could try using openjdk6 instead.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jimmy
>
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 07:38:40PM +0200
can look at ( i stupidly
don;t log this myself)
Not that I know of and I'm at an equal stupidity level :-)
/ Jimmy
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
_
them from all the p5-* ports, portupgrade
started working again. When running portupgrade again I was more
restrictive with what options to actually enable and after that
everything works.
Don't know if that will help anyone b
Hi all
could any one update cherokee port due to this is a log bug included in 36
version.
Cheers
Jimmy fan
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "fr
Hi all
there is a bug within current cherokee 36 version. as the official version 37
is available now, could you please update it as you can?
thanks
Jimmy Fan
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
og to the maintainer.
--
jimmy
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Sun, 1 Jul 2012, Chris Rees wrote:
Jimmy, you need to remove Lang/erlang14 from Lang/Makefile until you've
updated lang/erlang.
Good catch - it should be fixed now. Thank you!
--
jimmy
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
Wrong sender - trying again.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 17:08:14 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jimmy Olgeni
To: po...@freebsd.org
Cc: erl...@freebsd.org
Subject: Call for volunteers: FreeBSD Erlang Team
Hi,
During the next new days I'm planning to move most o
. But as soon as I try to
install anything, the wordpress from poudriere is never picked up but
the other packages are. I've obviously messed something up but I
cannot find what. I've been scratching my head for days so any
suggestions or hints would be good.
Tha
the same time so I got stuck thinking it was something wrong with
that.
Cheers, Jimmy
Citerar Adam Weinberger :
On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 3:22 AM Jimmy Renner wrote:
Well, maybe it is not as simple.
I have set up poudriere to build som packages locally, right now:
graphics/pecl-imagick
Anyone has any idea what's causing this. Been banging my head a couple
of days and am running out of ideas.
Thankful for any help / Jimmy
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
uilt against a snapshot
version of something and two weeks later an official release of that
‘something’ is pushed out and the snapshot repo is deleted.
And while it way work for simple projects to be able to use the built-in maven
capability to just resolve and download dependencies (and do nothing else) as a
single command in the port fetching phases, this might not work for all
projects - definitely not something as complex as a Eclipse.
Jimmy
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
ted the reason why the user-base of
base or ports are moving to git?
Going with the fashion, IMO. But I will no doubt get shouted down.
If it is deprecated where do I find the information I need, this does
not help:
https://docs.freebsd.org/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbo
tried gitup and was told tha I had no permissions for
/var/db/gitup. Can I not run gitup as a normal user?
Trying to run the latest poudriere from ports (git) and that seems to
still use the subversion variant, or do I need to reinitialize
something?
Have I missed some migration guide
audio2 for some reason, even if it
uses USE_LDCONFIG. Other dependencies look ok; the only difference is
that portaudio2 lives in its own path under lib/.
Does anybody else see anything like this in their setup?
--
jimmy
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org ma
the project on Sourceforge to be
layed out with subdirectories corresponding to the PORTVERSION, which then would
contain the file to be downloaded.
If you use SF/${PORTNAME} for MASTER_SITES, it will fetch the file
${PORTNAME}-${PORTVERSION}.tar.gz from the top-level download director
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 09:40:59AM -0700, Anton Afanasyev wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 5:25 AM, Bob Willcox wrote:
>
> > I'd be willing to. I don't think anything for it has changed. The
> > distfile is
> > still available at the same location. I still run it and don't see any
> > issues
> >
me thing, 10-CURRENT r252987, with r322456 of virtualbox-ose
(4.2.16).
The "Memory size" dialog, when trying to create a new virtual machine, shows
0MB for the
max, the slider cannot be moved and the text box accepts input but appears to
be ignored.
Jimmy
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 05:46:18PM +0400, Mikhail Tsatsenko wrote:
> 2013/7/8 Jimmy Kelley :
> >
> >> On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 10:40 AM, David Demelier
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hey guys,
> >>>
> >>> Are you ex
PR number?
Or was this just some discussion on the mailing list?
I'll file an offical PR if there isn't one.
Jimmy
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 01:34:59PM +0200, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Jimmy Kelley wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 10:14:44PM +0400, Mikhail Tsatsenko wrote:
> >> 2013/7/8 Jimmy Kelley :
> >> > On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 12:40:16PM
h-* (see /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk), so I imagine the file
names
would be sorted alphabetically by the wildcard. It is not required, but each
patch file generally is meant to patch a specific source file, and the
individual
sections of a patch file are applied in the order that they appear. If
make clean' and 'make' again, and watching with ps shows
g++/gcc being run to
compile the source files, but cc when it hits that linking stage.
I'm no expert on libtool/gnome-libtool; anybody have any ideas of what I could
do to debug this?
Jimmy
___
>
> Thx
>
> matthias
> --
> Sent from my FreeBSD netbook
>
> Matthias Apitz, , http://www.unixarea.de/ f: +49-170-4527211
> UNIX since V7 on PDP-11, UNIX on mainframe since ESER 1055 (IBM /370)
>
> UNIX on x86 since SVR4.2 UnixWare 2
opy of the git repo), but
for eclipse it's necessary because the build process needs the repo history
for timestamp info, and it really does speed things up (and will for future
port updates).
Perhaps this might help with the multimarkdown port...
Jimmy
_
t you make the patch work with all versions of gcc?
>
+1
Make the PATCH deal with whatever version of GCC is being
used to compile that big of code...
Jimmy
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-p
Hi,
I don't know if this is the right list to post to but for me lots (a
bit over 100) of ports are updated but if I do a pkg upgrade not much
is updated. This has been the case since I upgraded to 10.2. No
complaints, I was just wondering if I have done anything wrong :-)
Cheers,
Citerar Mike Clarke :
On Tue, 08 Sep 2015 08:46:48 +0200
Jimmy Renner wrote:
I don't know if this is the right list to post to but for me lots (a
bit over 100) of ports are updated but if I do a pkg upgrade not much
is updated. This has been the case since I upgraded to 10.2. No
compl
MAVEN_OPTS on i386 is too big; try -Xmx1792m.
I had that in the Makefile when first developing and testing the port, but
removed it; maybe putting that back in will deal with the complaints that
bdrewery@ had about memory usage on the package builders...
redports has never been kind to this
an/man1/ipengine.1
Error: Missing: man/man1/ipython.1
===> Error: Plist issues found.
*** Error code 1
gzipped man pages are installed as usual, but the uncompressed version is
listed in the automatic plist.
--
jimmy
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing li
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 12:30:16PM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día Tuesday, September 09, 2014 a las 09:10:26AM -0500, Jimmy Kelley
> escribió:
>
> > Hello Matthias,
> >
> > No ideas at the present on your problem. I tried building the eclipse port
> >
ib says OpenSSL
1.0.2j-freebsd.
What have I messed up? :-)
Any help or pointers would be much appreciated.
Cheers, Jimmy
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any m
Citerar Matthew Seaman :
On 2017/01/23 15:26, Jimmy Renner wrote:
I might be totally off (and in the wrong forum) but I'm having problems
running the mumble version fetched by pkg, if I try to build the same
version in ports everything works fine. The failing one complains about
"
Citerar Mathieu Arnold :
Le 23/01/2017 à 17:20, Jimmy Renner a écrit :
Citerar Matthew Seaman :
On 2017/01/23 15:26, Jimmy Renner wrote:
I might be totally off (and in the wrong forum) but I'm having problems
running the mumble version fetched by pkg, if I try to build the same
versi
Citerar Greg Byshenk :
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 09:05:19PM +0100, Jimmy Renner wrote:
>>> On 2017/01/23 15:26, Jimmy Renner wrote:
>>>> I might be totally off (and in the wrong forum) but I'm having problems
>>>> running the mumble version fetc
Hi,
I've been having some problems with the emulaters/vgba-bin port. Although
it downloads and installs correctly, it tells me:
$ vgba
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libm.so.2" not found, required by "vgba"
What sh
I am at a loss for what to do, as, trying to compile graphics/xpdf, I got
the following results:
$ sudo portinstall xpdf
---> Installing 'xpdf-3.01_3' from a port (graphics/xpdf)
---> Building '/usr/ports/graphics/xpdf'
===> Cleaning for freetype2-2.2.1_1
===> Cleaning for gmake-3.81_1
===> Cl
There is a bug in the latest openjdk7 (7.55.13_3,1).
You could try using openjdk6 instead.
Regards,
Jimmy
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 07:38:40PM +0200, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> Hello.
>
> As per subject, I cannot build java/junit:
>
> > # cd /usr/ports/java/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
43 matches
Mail list logo
