sshd in 8.0-RC3 is 0.9.8K 25 Mar 2009
OpenSSH has a newer "0.9.8L 2009 Nov 05" which they state is primarily a "bug
fix" release.
Is there any way of getting this rolled into the upcoming 8.0 Release ?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
ht
tried to make mail/dspam and it exits nagging that it
requires MySQL 5.0 client, where I have MySQL 5.1
Is there a way to convince the dspam routine that
5.1 is acceptable? (presuming that it IS).
Thanks.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Sahil Tandon wrote:
[mail/dspam maintainer Cc:'d]
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 09:46:04 +0200, David DEMELIER wrote:
2010/7/13 Sahil Tandon :
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 21:28:56 +0200, David DEMELIER wrote:
Yes sometime I'm nasty with people, I'm sorry about that but when I
saw this port I just didn't u
On 8/24/2010 4:48 PM, Denny Lin wrote:
I submitted ports/149866 a few days ago to update Dovecot to 1.2.13.
Still awaiting maintainer approval.
I'll submit another PR to update Dovecot to 1.2.14 this afternoon.
did you have any success with a response from the Dovecot maintainer?
dovecot is
FYI for all concerned
On 10/18/2010 10:36 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 09:47 -0700, Jim Pazarena wrote:
So, my question is, respectfully, is dovecot V2.0.5 stable enough
for prime-time on a busy ISP mail server?
It's getting better :) I'll make 2.0.6 release
On 2010-10-18 9:47 AM, Jim Pazarena wrote:
V2 of dovecot has had the following releases (to recap)
2.0.0 2010-08-16
2.0.1 2010-08-24
2.0.2 2010-09-08
2.0.3 2010-09-17
2.0.4 2010-09-26
2.0.5 2010-10-01
2.0.6 2010-10-25
2.0.7 2010-11-12
FreeBSD added dovecot2 to the ports recently (finally
My question is a general one, with the following specific example.
I wanted to re-compile the latest phpmyadmin
but when I tried that, I get a "you must have the latest php5" (5.4.6)
when I try php5
I get a dependency of devel/pkgconf
when I compile pkgconf, it conflicts with devel/pkg-config
I elected to do a complete re-install of an 8.3 server, and kde4 fails
because of dependencies:
x11/kde4 depends on:
misc/kdeedu4 which depends on:
japanese/kiten WHICH FAILS
Is there a way to have kde4 -not- use and therefore not depend on
kdeedu4 ? Or not have kdeedu4 depend on kiten?
this is on a fresh install of 8.3, and AFTER running a csup
Alberto Villa wrote, On 2012-08-27 3:16 PM:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Jim Pazarena wrote:
Is there a way to have kde4 -not- use and therefore not depend on
kdeedu4 ? Or not have kdeedu4 depend on kiten?
Of course, you can
Alberto Villa wrote, On 2012-08-27 4:05 PM:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 12:52 AM, Jim Pazarena wrote:
=> kiten-4.8.4.tar.bz2 is not in /usr/ports/japanese/kiten/distinfo.
=> Either /usr/ports/japanese/kiten/distinfo is out of date, or
=> kiten-4.8.4.tar.bz2 is spelled incorrectly.
*** Err
Alberto Villa wrote, On 2012-08-28 3:31 AM:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 2:07 AM, Jim Pazarena wrote:
Can you show the output of `make -C /usr/ports/japanese/kiten -V
USE_BZIP2`, please?
it replies with one word only:
yes
Please, keep kde@ CCed.
Can you paste (http://pastebin.com) /usr/ports
Alberto Villa wrote, On 2012-08-28 11:51 PM:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 5:21 AM, Jim Pazarena wrote:
Alberto Villa wrote, On 2012-08-28 3:31 AM:
USE_KDE4= kdehier kdelibs kdeprefix automoc4
KDE4_BUILDENV= yes
USE_QT_VER= 4
QT_COMPONENTS= corelib moc_build qmake_build rcc_build
Alberto Villa wrote, On 2012-08-29 8:17 AM:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Jim Pazarena wrote:
I use: csup -g -L 2 ports-supfile
and ports-supfile
has all the recommended defaults, including "ports-all"
what am I missing?
I don't know, maybe something went wrong in th
tracking down
compile issues related to version dependencies .
I compiled python36 , via lang/python . but something else I am
compiling keeps dragging in python27 . Why can't it simply use python36
? (Haven't determined what application is dragging it in as of yet) .
--
Jim
On 9.1 amd, something has changed within my ports. This compiled fine
the very first time I installed 9.1, but a recent re-install generates
the following error(s) of failed references to lzma_*.
I frequently run a portsnap fetch, (extract only once) and an update.
Any suggestions would be much
Jung-uk Kim wrote, On 2013-04-18 9:36 AM:
...
This problem was already discussed multiple times. [1][2]
Sorry, I saw no reference in either the fquestion or the
fports news groups.
Patch much appreciated, hope it can get committed soon.
You can download my patch from here:
http://people.fr
I'm attempting a re-install of 10.1 amd, and cmake is a show stopper,
appearing to have a problem with liblzma. I re-installed liblzma, yet
cmake continues to fail. Without cmake many other things such as mysql
fail because of the dependency on cmake.
I am not sure what to do.
Any help would be
just attempted to update another server, and cmake dies on it as well
citing the same liblzma error
oh my. had better stop with the updates until someone fixes this.
On 2015-04-18 11:14 AM, Jim Pazarena wrote:
I'm attempting a re-install of 10.1 amd, and cmake is a show stopper,
appe
presently p5-HTML-Embperl in the ports is at 1.3.6_2 however it is marked as
"will not compile".
The main website for Embperl shows a much newer stable version (2.2.0)
Is there any way someone (more clever than myself) could get this newer version
to compile in the ports system?
I would very mu
Cezary Morga wrote:
hideo wrote:
Jim Pazarena (Sun 03/15/09 23:22):
presently p5-HTML-Embperl in the ports is at 1.3.6_2 however it is
marked as "will not compile".
The main website for Embperl shows a much newer stable version
(2.2.0)
Is there any way someone (more clever than mys
I find that while a job is running via the at facility, that is,
atrun has executed it, every subsequent execution of atrun (via
cron) STAYS running while the original program (executed by atrun)
is still active.
Generally, according to the docs, atrun is executed every 5 minutes
*/5 * * * * with
I have several servers, some 9.1, 9.2, 10.0
all nagging about the deprecated package system.
So I've bitten the bullet and am converting to the new pkg system.
The notes for conversion indicate you must add "WITH_PKGNG=yes" to
make.conf. Also done.
On a new/fresh install, V10, should a person imm
On 2014-05-28 11:30 AM, Jim Ohlstein wrote:
Hello,
On 5/28/14, 2:13 PM, Jim Pazarena wrote:
On a new/fresh install, V10, should a person immediately place
"WITH_PKGNG=yes" in the make.conf ? And then is it not required
to run pkg2ng ? Or is it implied? It seems not, but I c
On 2014-06-08 10:55 AM, Warren Block wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2014, Jim Pazarena wrote:
No. pkg is just a package manager. It does not replace ports, it just
handles packages. Like the old package manager, binary packages can be
downloaded and installed rather than ports, but the choice is
24 matches
Mail list logo
