Re: git snapshots, PORTVERSION, PORTEPOCH

On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 06:48:56 -0600, Max Brazhnikov wrote: On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 15:01:37 +0300, Anonymous wrote: Ion-Mihai Tetcu writes: > On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 09:32:52 +0300 > > Anonymous wrote: >> Would it be okay if I use commit hash in PORTVERSION and constantly >> bump PORTEPOCH on each

Re: Problem with .so numbering on FreeBSD in contrast to Linux

On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 03:16:21 -0600, Thomas Schmitt wrote: Hi, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > which i believe complies to policies-shlib.html. I think this is a little bit outdated. We only have one number after the .so since a long time. All libs in /lib and /usr/lib are .so.X and for 3rd

Re: Dead projects in ports tree

On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 17:09:04 -0600, Garrett Cooper wrote: Just trying to amass cruft in the ports tree that could be marked deprecated and removed. Some assistance in amassing the list would be helpful... multimedia/openquicktime - no movement in CVS / SVN for 1+ years; no releases in th

Re: Status of devel/boost upgrade

On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:29:19 -0600, Dmitry Marakasov wrote: * Alexander Churanov (alexanderchura...@gmail.com) wrote: As stated on http://wiki.freebsd.org/BoostPortingProject, all issues with ports depending on devel/boost are resolved. Thank guys for work on boost stuff. Should I do some

Re: Status of devel/boost upgrade

On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:02:46 -0600, Dmitry Marakasov wrote: Hi! By the way, I've just ran into this sample of code in www/openvrml: .if exists(${LOCALBASE}/include/boost/python.hpp) LIB_DEPENDS+= boost_python.4:${PORTSDIR}/devel/boost-python .else LIB_DEPENDS+= boost_regex.4:${PORTSDIR}/d

Re: Status of devel/boost upgrade

On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 09:50:11 -0600, Dmitry Marakasov wrote: * Alexander Churanov (alexanderchura...@gmail.com) wrote: There are 95 libraries in boost. Woo, that's sure too many. Let me explain that: Boost has source-only libraries and separately-compiled libraries. Source-only libraries

Re: HEADS UP: GNOME 2.26 available for FreeBSD

On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 04:47:33 -0500, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: On Tue, 14 Apr 2009, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: JMC> > JMC> > Another question: is there a way to avoid apache22 install (i have apache13 JMC> > JMC> > installed and have no current plans to upgrade) ? I tried to chase JMC> > JM

Re: HEADS UP: GNOME 2.26 available for FreeBSD

On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 10:15:59 -0500, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: On Sat, 18 Apr 2009, Jeremy Messenger wrote: JM> > JMC> > JMC> > Another question: is there a way to avoid apache22 install JM> > (i have apache13 JM> > JMC> > JMC> > installed and hav

Re: HEADS UP: GNOME 2.26 available for FreeBSD

On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 10:38:35 -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote: On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 10:15:59 -0500, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: On Sat, 18 Apr 2009, Jeremy Messenger wrote: JM> > JMC> > JMC> > Another question: is there a way to avoid apache22 install JM> > (i have a

Re: Why so many ports still depend on firefox-2.X.X.X ?

On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 10:37:13 -0500, Yuri wrote: Lowell Gilbert wrote: I see that ImageMagick, gimp, gimp-apps, inkscape, gnucash, etc depend on firefox-2. I don't see that at all. What makes you say that? None of those programs seem to have firefox on their dependency lists in the ports s

Re: [m...@issp.ac.ru: [kde-freebsd] request for test: printer-applet, system-config-printer-kde]

On Wed, 06 May 2009 04:05:00 -0500, Martin Wilke wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 forward to ports@ and python@ - - Forwarded message from Max Brazhnikov - Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 12:15:39 +0400 From: Max Brazhnikov To: kde-free...@kde.org Subject: [kde-freebsd] r

Re: portmaster and portmanager disagree

On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 17:00:52 -0500, Gary Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 10:17:07PM +0100, Mark Ovens wrote: Robert Noland wrote: >On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 19:46 +0100, Mark Ovens wrote: >>Tried updating all my ports - all 439 of them - sing ``portmanager -u''. >>Numer

Re: -- Spam --FreeBSD Port: p3scan-2.3.2_2

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 07:47:27 -0500, Andrew Karev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dear maintainer! Is it possible to apply changes from the attached file? Change list: 1. Allows to compile at RELENG_4 (added conditional dependency to devel/libgnugetopt). Yes, I know, that support for this branch is

Re: local ports

On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 01:13:29 -0500, Vulpes Velox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I was just wondering what any one else thought of the idea of adding a local directory to the ports tree and to the .cvsignore. This would be a directory for users to put local custom ports. I have my own ports tree

Re: linux-flashplugin9 + Opera 9.20 = no go

On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 12:32:55 -0500, RW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 09:25:56 -0700 (PDT) Jouni Laakso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It works. Great sound and awesome graphics. When installed as such in /usr/ports, plugin was not found but after putting a line in /usr/local/sha

Your ports depend on graphics/libcaca, please test.

Hello maintainers, I am planning to update graphics/libcaca to 0.99.beta11 (ports/111495). The update might break those ports that depend on graphics/libcaca, so I need you to test it for me and let me know if your ports can build. If your ports can't build, then please follow the guide of

Re: FreeBSD Port: pango-1.16.2

On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 01:40:27 -0500, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: checking if x11-toolkits/pango already installed /bin/sh. /config.status recheck ./config.status cant open /configstatus no such file or directory gmake config status error 2 Please follow this: http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/docs/bu

Re: libogg/libvorbis port problems

On Tue, 01 May 2007 12:59:10 -0500, Adam Stroud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: All: Is anyone else having problems building libogg/libvorbis from the ports? Fixed, my mistake. Cheers, Mezz I am getting a patch error since I updated my ports collection this morning. ===> Vulnerability che

Re: make -D recent problem?

On Tue, 01 May 2007 20:56:59 -0500, Garrett Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 09:12:29PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote: I'm not sure what you want to hear but to clarify What I meant was: when you are trying to report an error you usually need to show ex

Re: HEADS UP: xorg upgrade plans

On Mon, 07 May 2007 13:42:31 -0500, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 11:38:46AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: >Hi all, > >After many months of hard work (mostly by flz@, as well as others) we >are approaching readiness of the xorg 7.2 upgrade.

Re: HEADS UP: xorg upgrade plans

On Mon, 07 May 2007 15:14:48 -0500, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 03:09:06PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote: >No, at a minimum I am not comfortable recommending its use until it >saves old shared libraries across updates (I sent you email a

Re: HEADS UP: xorg upgrade plans

On Mon, 07 May 2007 15:44:14 -0500, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 03:35:48PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote: On Mon, 07 May 2007 15:14:48 -0500, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 03:09:06PM -0500, Jeremy

Re: gcvs error when doing make

On Wed, 09 May 2007 10:31:00 -0500, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dear Maintainer I got the following error when trying to compile gcvs on my FreeBSD machine: uname -a FreeBSD beastie.muhc.mcgill.ca 6.0-SECURITY FreeBSD 6.0-SECURITY #0: Tue Apr 18 08:56:09 UTC 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/us

Re: Problem with make-index

On Sat, 02 Jun 2007 09:57:37 -0500, stefanos sofroniou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dear Sirs, I have problem while trying to make index my ports. Here is what you need: # make fetchindex # make index Generating INDEX-6 - please wait..make: don't know how to make describe. Stop ===> audio/gst

Re: qt linking issue building xca-0.6.3 port

On Tue, 05 Jun 2007 16:05:09 -0500, Mark Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm working on an upgrade to the xca port (0.5.1 -> 0.6.3) that will obviate ports/109045 Mostly it is working except for the final stage & I am stuck... any guid

Re: Ports Index

On Wed, 06 Jun 2007 12:33:40 -0500, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: David wrote: Hello, I have this error when building a port index. Out of curiosity, why are you building the index yourself instead of using 'make fetchindex'? There are a few of reasons to build port index by yours

Re: deluge crashes at startup

On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 12:07:21 -0500, Laganakos Vassilis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, Has anybody had any problems with deluge? It is the first time I use it after the xorg-7.2 upgrade and I don't know if it is related to this. I get the following error when I try to run it: no existing

Re: Boost update ready for testing (was: Re: boost 1.34)

On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 11:36:28 -0500, Romain LE DISEZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Simon Barner wrote: The PR mentioned above contains an update to boost 1.34.0 that is currently being tested and the will hopefully be committed soon. I tried the patch but it does not compile for me. Im running -

Re: GMSGFMT variable not defined

On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 11:26:23 -0500, Marcin Simonides <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm the maintainer of multimedia/gnome-subtitles port. The new version adds language translations. I have added USE_GETTEXT=yes to the port's Makefile. There is a problem with building language translation file

Re: GMSGFMT variable not defined

On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 12:37:54 -0500, Marcin Simonides <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jeremy Messenger wrote: On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 11:26:23 -0500, Marcin Simonides [...] I've checked with the program's aclocal.m4, it contains a line: AC_PATH_PROG(GMSGFMT, gmsgfmt, $MSGFMT) whic

Re: GMSGFMT variable not defined

On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 13:13:59 -0500, Jeremy Messenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 12:37:54 -0500, Marcin Simonides <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jeremy Messenger wrote: On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 11:26:23 -0500, Marcin Simonides [...] I've checked with the pro

Re: pulseaudio upgrade fails

On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 05:38:44 -0500, [LoN]Kamikaze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The tail of the 'make install' output: gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/obj/mobileKamikaze.norad/usr/ports/audio/pulseaudio/work/pulseaudio-0.9.6' gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/obj/mobileKamikaze.norad/usr/ports

Re: Compiling audio/mp3info without GTK support

On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 15:25:51 -0500, Jeremie Le Hen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi list, Please Cc: me when replying. Look at this Makefile: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/audio/mp3info/Makefile?rev=1.18;content-type=text%2Fplain There is no WITH_/WITHOUT_ knob to switch off GTK

Need someone to test update of linuxdcpp.

Hello linuxdcpp users, I need someone to test the update of linuxdcpp to 0.0.1.20070804 with stable version of GTK+2. I am not able to test it since it doesn't work with development version of GTK+2. I am running everything from MC ports (GNOME 2.19.6/GTK+ 2.11.6). Thanks. http://people.f

Re: bsd.port.options.mk status

On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 11:58:34 -0500, Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dmitry Marakasov píše v po 10. 09. 2007 v 19:26 +0400: * Pav Lucistnik ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > It's possible to use this feature, but only on -CURRENT and -STABLE > > > FreeBSD systems newer than certain da

Re: A new version of Tools/scripts/plist

On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 03:31:08 -0500, Martin Tournoij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've written a replacement for /ports/Tools/scripts/plist, the reason this is a complete rewrite rather than an update is because I'm not familair with ruby, and writing a new version in python was faster. Problems

Re: ports tree broken with cycling dependencies

On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 11:35:29 -0500, Andriy Gapon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It seems that after todays portsnap (1 hour ago) my port tree is broken by having cycling dependencies. Example: /usr/ports/graphics/cairo$ make all-depends-list | grep pango /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/pango /usr/ports/x11

Re: autoconf/automake guru wanted [gnuplot-4.0 with patches]

On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 11:29:22 -0500, RW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 07:51:18 -0700 Ted Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm sorry if this sounds like a complaint. I just spent 2 days attempting to salvage a sane 6.2 development box which does not use X-Windows, because I stu

Re: Cups upgrade compile failure

On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 11:46:49 -0500, Manfred Antar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: At 09:17 AM 9/28/2007, David Southwell wrote: On Upgrade: Making all in cups... gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/print/cups-base/work/cups-1.3.0/cups' gmake[1]: Nothing to be done for `all'. gmake[1]: Leavi

Re: Cups upgrade compile failure

On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 14:36:10 -0500, Christoph Moench-Tegeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ## Jeremy Messenger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): >If you get rid of /usr/local/include/cups directory , it works >Somehow it picks up those includes instead of the ones in the port diectory Above s

Re: Idea: static builds

On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 14:03:04 -0500, Dmitry Marakasov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi! I just have an idea that may be useful: static port builds. This can help produce packages without any depends, which may be useful sometimes. Implementation seem pretty straightfoward to me: - Introduce STAT

Re: Which "linux emulation" works with which programs or the inverse?

On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 17:10:25 -0500, james <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 15:15 -0500, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote: On 10/24/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm totally confused. I was simply trying to get flash 9 or 7 working > in RELENG7 with which ever version

Re: HEADS UP: GNOME 2.20.1 available for FreeBSD

On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 23:19:24 -0500, Aryeh M. Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 23:53 -0400, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: Jeremy Messenger wrote: On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 22:44:19 -0500, Aryeh M. Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: HEADS UP: GNOME 2.20.1 available for FreeBSD

On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 23:31:32 -0500, Aryeh M. Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 23:53 -0400, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: Jeremy Messenger wrote: On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 22:44:19 -0500, Aryeh M. Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: HEADS UP: GNOME 2.20.1 available for FreeBSD

On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 22:44:19 -0500, Aryeh M. Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: On behalf of the FreeBSD GNOME team, it is my great pleasure to announce that GNOME 2.20.1 has been merged into the FreeBSD ports tree. The official Using portupgrade the install fails

Re: HEADS UP: GNOME 2.20.1 available for FreeBSD

On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 04:02:53 -0500, Aryeh M. Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Forgot to mention portsupgrade also give the following errors on start up: avahi-autoipd-0.6.21: "/usr/ports/net/avahi-qt4" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete avahi-gtk-0.6.21: "/usr/ports/net/avahi-qt4

Re: HEADS UP: GNOME 2.20.1 available for FreeBSD

On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 14:22:32 -0500, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 12:45:44AM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 00:37 -0400, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: > > > > You will have to talk to the mono maintainer as we didn't touch > > lang/mono port at all. > > N

Re: HEADS UP: GNOME 2.20 is being merged

On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:27:03 -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have temporarily locked the ports tree while I merge the GNOME 2.20 update. This update will end up touching a lot of ports as we have collapsed DATADIR from using share/gnome/ to just share/. I will send anot

Re: Proposition: make x11/nvidia-driver independent of misc/compat5x

On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 08:33:46 -0500, Carlos A. M. dos Santos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, Using the patch below it is possible to make x11/nvidia-driver independent of misc/compat5x, by means of some library mapping. I did this successfuly on 6.x but still did not test on 7.x. I would lik

Re: [6-STABLE] vlc-0.8.5_5 error during portupgrade

In future, please don't spam to us. Choice one, either email to multimedia@ or send us a PR is good enough. On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 05:14:30 -0500, Adi Pircalabu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, after latest cvsup I've got this error during portupgrade -av: I can't reproduce this error, you ne

Re: BSD.local.dist - share/locale

On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 08:26:53 -0500, Andrew Pantyukhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I can't help thinking that the way we're trying to deal with locale directories is far from optimal. IMHO, there are several ways to improve the state of things: I think the current how we handle locale is a bit

Re: FreeBSD Port: handbrake-0.7.1_1

On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 07:42:29 -0500, Till Haselmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dear multimedia team: I have built Handbrake successfully using the old port (0.7.1) but cannot get it to compile with the new version 0.7.1_1. The output from portupgrade is as attached to this email. Apparently,

Re: portmaster patch for testing CONFLICTS and dependency list (Was: Re: portmaster and dependencies)

On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:51:56 -0500, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've created a patch that has the dependency list change, plus the experimental work I'm doing on trying to handle alternate dependencies via CONFLICTS. It's at http://dougbarton.us/portmaster-conflicts-depends.patch

Re: BSD.local.dist - share/locale

On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 09:50:52 -0500, Andrew Pantyukhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 8/24/06, Jeremy Messenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 08:26:53 -0500, Andrew Pantyukhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I can't help thinking that the way we'

Re: BSD.local.dist - share/locale

On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:24:08 -0500, Andrew Pantyukhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 8/25/06, Jeremy Messenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 09:50:52 -0500, Andrew Pantyukhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/24/06, Jeremy Messenger <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: FreeBSD Port: handbrake-0.7.1_1

On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 08:40:48 -0500, Jeremy Messenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 07:42:29 -0500, Till Haselmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dear multimedia team: I have built Handbrake successfully using the old port (0.7.1) but cannot get it to compile

fluxbox-devel is going to move in LOCALBASE...

Hello folks, I have created patches for fluxbox-devel to move from X11BASE to LOCALBASE. I am also CC'ing to the maintainers that ports are related with fluxbox-devel. Please check in the diff and let me know if one of your ports that need to be bump to make it works with the fluxbox-devel.

Re: Ports freeze for 6.2 starts October 10

On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 23:52:01 -0500, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 08:45:56PM -0300, Rainer Alves wrote: Erwin Lansing wrote: >In preparation for the 6.2 release, the ports tree will be frozen from >October 10. >[...] Just wondering if there's a chance of se

Re: New portmaster beta available

On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:02:34 -0500, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Howdy, It's been a while, but I think I finally have all the bugs ironed out of the new features that people have been requesting. There is a new version (1.129) available at http://dougbarton.us/portmaster which has the

Re: What is this?

On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 12:00:56 -0500, Heino Tiedemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi One thing i do not understand: ,[ ports/UPDATING ] | 20061009: | ^ (LOO AT THIS!) | AFFECTS: users of any ports using Python | AUTHOR: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | After upgrading of lang/python, you

Re: HEADS UP: GNOME 2.16.1 has been committed

By the way, if anyone have any problem with login in GNOME after the upgrade such as slow or maybe get a very small error. Try to run this gnome_prefix.sh[1] script as in your orignal user to fix the ~/.* files if you don't want to remove your GNOME config. Let me know if it helps. If the

Re: Ports with version numbers going backwards: deskutils/sunbird

Fixed by add PORTEPOCH, thanks for report. Cheers, Mezz On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 12:54:09 -0500, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ** The following ports have a version number that sorts before a previous one ** For many package tools to work correctly, it is of utmost importance that version numbe

Re: Ports with version numbers going backwards: deskutils/sunbird

too late, which in the begin should have add DISTVERSION when "a1" was added before commit in the port. The DISTVERSION will turning it into 0.3.a1. hth, Doug PS, PORTEPOCH is evil, and must die. Maybe, but we don't have any choice. Cheers, Mezz Jeremy Messenger wrot

Re: HEADS UP: GNOME 2.16.1 has been committed

On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 23:54:08 -0500, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: John Hay wrote: It looks like ports/UPDATING is mixing sysutils/portmanager and portmaster in the 20061014 part that tells how to update gnome. Is that on purpose? The entry says this: 20061014: AFFECTS: All GNOME

Re: Port Bloat

On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 00:53:32 -0500, Peter Thoenen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: A couple months ago somebody posted a heads up on this list from the FreeBSD Ports Team about ports bloat and the massive influx of new software along with all the unmaintained ports. Has the port team ever thought abo

Re: Gnome 2.16 upgrade failed (yeah, I read /usr/src/UPDATING)

On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 20:05:02 -0500, Rainer Alves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Clint Olsen wrote: I ran the exact commands specified in the UPDATING file, and I eventually get: ** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed) ! devel/py-gobject (py24-gobject-2.10.1)(new c

Re: GNOME upgrade problem

On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 20:31:13 -0500, Jiawei Ye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I ran into this several times so what I did was remove all GNOME related components, did a portupgrade -rf pkg-conf\* and reinstall gnome-lite, but the problem persists: Run 'rm -rf /usr/X11R6/include/libxklavier' and try

Re: firefox-1.5.0.7_1, 1 does not load plugins from /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins/

On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 23:32:56 -0500, Pierre-Luc Drouin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have multiple plugins, both native and linux (through linuxpluginwrapper) in /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins/ and The browser_plugins lives in LOCALBASE now, so it's in /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins/. Che

Re: HEADS UP: GNOME 2.16.1 has been committed

On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 12:12:22 -0500, martinko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: martinko wrote: mato wrote: On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 20:42:41 -0400, Michael Johnson wrote On 10/15/06, martinko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello and thanks for your hard work! I've been using WITH_GECKO=seamonkey (and

Re: gnucash will not install/run.... [SOLVED]

On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 12:47:38 -0500, Eric Schuele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 10/21/06 12:38, Eric Schuele wrote: On 10/20/06 20:05, Peter Jeremy wrote: On Fri, 2006-Oct-20 08:15:22 -0500, Eric Schuele wrote: I have tried this and many other variants. Not quite sure what else to do here.

Re: gnome update

On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 12:17:48 -0500, Andrew Pantyukhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 10/23/06, Ganbold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I'm trying to update gnome to 2.16 using portmaster for more than 3 days :( portmaster is good, but you really should use portupgrade if you're stumbling o

Re: gnome update

On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 21:34:08 -0500, Ganbold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jeremy Messenger wrote: On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 12:17:48 -0500, Andrew Pantyukhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 10/23/06, Ganbold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I'm trying to update gnome to 2.16 us

Re: firefox 2.0

On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 20:49:34 -0500, Peter Thoenen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sorry, but the Firefox 2.0 release was too late to be included in FreeBSD 6.2. Is it really that late? Yes. Cheers, Mezz Firefox is something new uesrs look for / expect and it has a large enough view that we mig

Re: make ports depending on sysutils/cdrtools* USE_GNOME=cdrools

On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 14:15:21 -0600, Chuck Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Oct 31, 2006, at 8:59 AM, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote: [ ... ] Description: Some ports depending on sysutils/cdrtools and some ports dependeing on sysutils/cdrtools-cjk are conflicted. So I want to in

Re: useful shell script

On Sat, 04 Nov 2006 12:40:56 -0600, J. R. Lenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Reclaiming disk space was a high priority on my laptop, which has a 4gb FreeBSD partition. So, I wrote a useful shell script for removing all the "work" directories in the ports tree (I'm sure someone has already don

Re: Problem with audio/gstreamer-plugins-a52dec (still)

On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 11:12:05 -0600, Shaun Amott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 05:53:46PM +0200, Nicki de Wet wrote: I'm still getting the error below on our installations. %uname -v FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE #0: Tue May 25 22:47:12 GMT 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/s

Re: Undefined reference to 'llrint' when portinstalling multimedia/mplayer

On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 12:22:41 -0600, Anthony Elizondo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm getting the following error when installing multimedia/mplayer. Anyone have any ideas? I'm running 5.3-RELEASE. Your system is too old, please update it to 5.5 or even better to 6.x. gmake[1]: Leaving direc

Re: stale dependencies and portupgrade

On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 12:47:30 -0600, Vivek Khera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Nov 28, 2006, at 1:20 PM, Doug Barton wrote: I suppose the bug is that I expected portupgrade -Rr to recompute the dependency lists of the upstream ports to take into account any changing dependencies of the updated

Re: Firefox & thunderbird crash saving a file

Guys, more of 'me too' are so useless. Please make your bug report useful. marcus is still waiting for someone to fill out his request[1]. I can't fill out his request, because I still can't reproduce it on two systems. If I can reproduce it then his request will be complete, because all o

Re: Firefox & thunderbird crash saving a file

On Fri, 08 Dec 2006 03:16:01 -0600, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jeremy Messenger wrote: Guys, more of 'me too' are so useless. Please make your bug report useful. marcus is still waiting for someone to fill out his request[1]. I can't fill out his request,

Re: Firefox & thunderbird crash saving a file

On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:48:43 -0600, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jeremy Messenger wrote: On Fri, 08 Dec 2006 03:16:01 -0600, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jeremy Messenger wrote: Guys, more of 'me too' are so useless. Please make your bug re

Re: Firefox & thunderbird crash saving a file

On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 04:58:06 -0600, Mark Ovens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jeremy Messenger wrote: marcus has won the fight, so he has a patch to fix it. http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/2006-December/016302.html Excellent! I've just applied this patch and

Re: Firefox & thunderbird crash saving a file

On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:34:35 -0600, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jeremy Messenger wrote: Oh, your problem is different after I read your message again. I don't have any of printer, so unsure with your problem. I can actually reproduce this just by doing print preview, t

Re: How to compile nautilus with debug symbols from ports?

On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:57:27 -0600, Andrew Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi there, I had nautilus crash on me, the other day. I think that I can repeat the crash: well, it's happened twice, doing the same thing (attempting a VFS mount of a file share from a Windows laptop that requires a

Re: HAL with new kdebase (permission problems)

On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 16:25:26 -0600, Michael Nottebrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thursday, 21. December 2006 21:54, Csaba Molnar wrote: Hello! I installed kdebase with HAL support - it is still greyed out in kcontrol, but seems to work. That's normal - the ability to switch from HAL

Re: HAL with new kdebase (permission problems)

On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 17:22:52 -0600, Michael Nottebrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thursday, 21. December 2006 23:56, Jeremy Messenger wrote: You have to be in operator group for automatic mount. As for the vfs.usermount, not need but I would suggesst to keep it. http://www.freeb

Re: Bug firefox 2.0.0.1

On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 11:50:26 -0600, Benjamin Pavie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've just installed the last package of firefox (version 2.0.0.1) via the command : portinstall -P firefox I meet this warning during the installation : ===> Building Chrome's registry... pkg_add: warning: package '

Re: HEADS UP: 4.x is no longer supported by the ports collection

On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 18:51:49 -0600, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: As previously announced, FreeBSD 4.x has now reached its end of life and is no longer supported in the ports collection (or by the security officer for security fixes). I have tagged the ports collection with the REL

Re: FreeBSD Port: fast-user-switch-applet-2.16.3

On Fri, 02 Feb 2007 08:36:48 -0600, Jeffrey Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, I was working on this port and it seems it does not work with the current GDM. I was trying to get the /usr/ports/x11/gnome2 to work and it gets stuck on the fast-user Can you shed some like to what my prob

Re: gtk-2.10.9 doesn't compile

On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 06:52:05 -0600, Vittorio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dear All, Under a fresh installation of 6.2 I recently updated via portsnap the ports tree and recompiled what was needed (including portupgrade!), BUT after issuing as root: portupgrade gtk I obtain the following obscure,

Re: Fwd: Re: gtk-2.10.9 doesn't compile

lower than that like pkg-config. Cheers, Mezz Ciao Vittorio -- Messaggio inoltrato -- Subject: Re: gtk-2.10.9 doesn't compile Date: 18:06, lunedì 12 febbraio 2007 From: "Jeremy Messenger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Vittorio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [E

Re: portupgrade O(n^m)?

On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 12:17:00 -0600, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: = Pros: = -It's written in python (portable). Isn't our more portable for hardware than Python? Also, it is smaller? -It's a system which focuses on ports compilation from source, not binary package installation. This

Re: portmaster and local ports (Was: Re: portupgrade O(n^m)?)

On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:54:29 -0600, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: David Gilbert wrote: "Jeremy" == Jeremy Messenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jeremy> Give ports-mgmt/portmaster a try. I just did. One flaw it has is that I have two no longer supported p

Re: Impending update to devel/gettext

On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:01:03 -0600, Ade Lovett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Feb 13, 2007, at 00:23 , Peter Johnson wrote: The correct fix is probably a patch to the gettext configure script to disable the check for gmkdir. Hi Peter, Please see http://www.lovett.com/ade/freebsd/gettext-4.d

Re: WITH_DEBUG too restrictive on CFLAGS?

On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 15:52:43 -0600, Sean McNeil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have found recently that the following ports will not compile on amd64 when WITH_DEBUG is set to "YES": converters/recode devel/pwlib searching for all ports that set CFLAGS with -fPIC, I find:

Re: xmms-speex missing header file

On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 11:05:37 -0600, David J Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: # make ===> Building for xmms-speex-0.9.1_4 gmake: Nothing to be done for `Makefile'. cc -c `xmms-config --cflags` -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -fPIC -DVERSION=\"0.9.1\" -DPACKAGE=\"libspeex\" -o http.o http.

Re: xmms-speex missing header file

On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 13:15:45 -0600, Jeremy Messenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 11:05:37 -0600, David J Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: # make ===> Building for xmms-speex-0.9.1_4 gmake: Nothing to be done for `Makefile'. cc -c `xmms-config --cfl

Re: xmms-speex missing header file

On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 16:52:10 -0600, David J Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sunday 25 February 2007 15:56, Jeremy Messenger wrote: On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 13:15:45 -0600, Jeremy Messenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: At first, make sure you update the speex to 1.2.b1_1. Then o

Re: GnuCash

On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 23:30:02 -0600, Karel Miklav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Peter Jeremy wrote: > After re-implementing my configure patch, re-building libltdl15 and > completing the gnucash upgrade, everything works correctly. I must confirm, that this works for me too. Thank you very much

Re: OSS sound for linux-flashplugin9

On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 17:33:22 -0600, Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Lofi, can you check the attached patch, if it works for ya? I went ahead to test the 9 version for first time and I am getting a complain about missing dependency. It needs linux-gtk2. ope

<    1   2   3   4   5   >