finance/aqbanking lost command line tool with update

After ports/129598, finance/aqbanking was recently updated from 2.3.3 to 3.8.1. This caused a major regression for me, as I was using the command line aqbanking-tool (and some shell scripts around it) as the banking client. In the 3.X series, that is not included anymore. There is AqBanking-CL

More libgmp leftovers due to indirect dependencies

math/libqalculate and print/lilypond both link libgmp.so.X, but have not been bumped with the libgmp.so.7->libgmp.so.8 update as they do not list the dependency. math/libqalculate pulls in libgmp via libcln and print/lilypond via libguile, thus the default package will always depend on libgmp.

Help test aqbanking-4.0.0 (especially with gnucash)

As I wrote two weeks ago, the aqbanking-2.3.3 to 3.8.1 update took away the command line banking client I use. Thus, I am eager to get 4.0.0, which includes a new one. I made a patch: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=135161 I need someone using gnucash with aqbanking to check the fun

Re: kdeedu-4.2.4 to 4.2.4_1 facile.cmxa compile error

Troy wrote: I was just upgrading from kdeedu-4.2.4 to 4.2.4_1 and the following error occurred. [ 12%] Generating solver.o File "_none_", line 1, characters 0-1: Error: Files /usr/local/lib/ocaml/facile/facile.cmxa and /usr/local/lib/ocaml/stdlib.cmxa make inconsistent assumptio

Re: FreeBSD Port: octave-3.2.2_5

Maho NAKATA wrote: From: Joey Mingrone I'm having some trouble upgrading this port. % uname -a FreeBSD ... 7.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE #1: Wed May 6 12:48:08 ... i386 Here's the error in the build: making gendoc.cc g++44 -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local

Re: FreeBSD Port: octave-3.2.2_5

Maho NAKATA wrote: From: Jan Henrik Sylvester Maho NAKATA wrote: From: Joey Mingrone I'm having some trouble upgrading this port. % uname -a FreeBSD ... 7.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE #1: Wed May 6 12:48:08 ... i386 Here's the error in the build: making gendoc.cc g++44 -O2 -

RESTRICTED among 8.0-release packages (Sep-23 set)

Comparing the INDEX of the 8.0-release package set from Sep-23 to my installed packages, I found some oddities. Many RESTRICTED packages are included, for example: print/acroread8, net/skype, www/linux-flashplugin9, astro/google-earth, multimedia/win32-codecs, audio/lame, print/pdflib, audio/e

RESTRICTED packages on FTP not a problem?

http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2009-September/057182.html I wonder why I got no reply to my posting and the new 8.0-RELEASE package set on FTP still contains RESTRICTED packages... not a problem or overlooked? For example: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packag

Re: Issue with inkscape port

Guy Brand wrote: Am I the only one having severe issue with inkscape from the ports? I'm using 0.46_6, without a config option and its 129 dependancies (see attached output of pkg_info) on a FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT r198491. Adding a layer is simply impossible, inkscape freezes and there is no other w

Re: [patch] switch to Emacs 23

Boris Samorodov wrote: here is a patch to switch to Emacs 23 as a default. There are 50 affected ports. Tests were done at tinderbox. Please give this patch a try. I'm going to fire up an exp run after some testing. The patch is relative to PORTSDIR: You already know that I have been running em

Re: ntfsprogs

As you are working on ntfsprogs, are you able to use ntfsresize at all? For me, ntfsresize never worked in ntfsprogs-2.0.0, but it did in ntfsprogs-1.13.1. We had a discussion about ntfsprogs on freebsd-questions almost a year ago: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2009-Apr

Direct or indirect libdependencies (using the libintl.so.8 case)

The general argument follows below, I just need some anecdotal evidence first: Yesterday, I was chasing libintl.so.8, rebuilding all ports that got bumped, checking with libchk for other libintl.so.8 dependencies, and forcing a rebuild of all these packages: All but two of them had an indirec

Re: Direct or indirect libdependencies (using the libintl.so.8 case)

On 01/-10/63 20:59, Alexander Leidinger wrote: Quoting Peter Jeremy (from Thu, 3 Jun 2010 22:37:28 +1000): On 2010-Jun-01 10:54:02 +0200, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: Yesterday, I was chasing libintl.so.8, rebuilding all ports that got bumped, checking with libchk for other libintl.so.8

Removal of java/jde: There is a pr for an update

Hi Doug! You just removed java/jde, but you forgot to look at prs for a fix. There is one (author Cced) with an update to a version that does fetch: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/158204 Since the new version is called jdee, maybe java/jde is really obsolete, but not before

Xournal: Please, help me with my first port

x27;7b6ea3301597bf7d5161b3f76878ae21' X# New ports collection makefile for: xournal X# Date created:21 Jan 2011 X# Whom:Jan Henrik Sylvester X# X# $FreeBSD$ X# X XPORTNAME= xournal XPORTVERSION= 0.4.5 XCATEGORIES=graphics XMASTER_SITES= SF X XMAINTAINER=m.

Re: Xournal: Please, help me with my first port

On 01/22/2011 14:04, Chris Rees wrote: On 22 January 2011 12:53, Chris Rees wrote: On 21 January 2011 21:46, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: Finally, I found an application worse having that is not in ports and looked simple enough to try: Xournal is my first attempt to create a new port. I

Re: Xournal: Please, help me with my first port

On 01/23/2011 11:42, Chris Rees wrote: Take a look at the new patch so far; I'm still working on Busybox at the moment, so I'm afraid I can't step too much more through it, but Just a question about what you did so far: Why the "CONFIGURE_ARGS+=--prefix=${PREFIX}"? I have tested with a differe

Re: Xournal: Please, help me with my first port

On 01/23/2011 17:35, Chris Rees wrote: On 23 January 2011 16:24, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: On 01/23/2011 11:42, Chris Rees wrote: Take a look at the new patch so far; I'm still working on Busybox at the moment, so I'm afraid I can't step too much more through it, but

Re: Xournal: Please, help me with my first port

Thanks for all your suggestions! Cheers, Jan Henrik ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Cannot open MS Word file with libreoffice-3.3.0_3

I just did a portupgrade to libreoffice-3.3.0_3 (amd64) -- with a package created on another machine that I did the portupgrade on before and that also had libreoffice-3.3.0_1 installed during make. In contrast to portrevisions 0 and 1, I cannot open MS Word files anymore. I get a window with

Onesided conflict: editors/openoffice.org-3 with devel/cppunit (=> editors/libreoffice)

I just tried to reinstall editors/openoffice.org-3 after recently installing editors/libreoffice that pulled in devel/cppunit -- I could not, since editors/openoffice.org-3 conflicts with devel/cppunit. Why is there a one-sided conflict? If editors/openoffice.org-3 and devel/cppunit really ins

sysutils/cdrtools in i386 chroot on amd64

I am trying to build all ports that I have installed in an i386 chroot environment on an amd64 machine. All work except for sysutils/cdrtools. I have installed an i386 system to some directory, mounted a devfs to the devfs subdirectory, set "MACHINE=i386 ; UNAME_p=i386 ; UNAME_m=i386" and expo

Re: sysutils/cdrtools in i386 chroot on amd64

On 02/11/2011 18:27, Marius Strobl wrote: On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 02:34:02PM +0100, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: I am trying to build all ports that I have installed in an i386 chroot environment on an amd64 machine. All work except for sysutils/cdrtools. I have installed an i386 system to some

Re: fixing the vulnerability in linux-f10-pango-1.22.3_1

On 01/-10/-28163 20:59, Matthias Andree wrote: Am 13.02.2011 22:53, schrieb Tom Uffner: is there any point in trying to update linux-f10-pango to address this vulnerability? Affected package: linux-f10-pango-1.22.3_1 Type of problem: pango -- integer overflow. Reference:

Maintainer timeout for port destroying itself (multimedia/dvdauthor)

I have been poking the maintainer of multimedia/dvdauthor three times since the beginning of this year about multimedia/dvdauthor applying a patch to the port itself and thus destroying the port after the second use. Instead of being applied to the port, a patch for the port itself seems to ha

pkg_add fusefs-kmod-0.3.9.p1_1.tbz fails on 6.2

After a 'portupgrade -f fusefs-kmod' (to make sure the port is installed correctly), I have created a package that now fails. # pkg_create -b fusefs-kmod-0.3.9.p1_1 # pkg_delete -f fusefs-kmod-0.3.9.p1_1 pkg_delete: package 'fusefs-kmod-0.3.9.p1_1' is required by these other packages and may n

fusefs-kmod package broken on 7.0 (was: pkg_add fusefs-kmod-0.3.9.p1_1.tbz fails on 6.2)

Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: After a 'portupgrade -f fusefs-kmod' (to make sure the port is installed correctly), I have created a package that now fails. # pkg_create -b fusefs-kmod-0.3.9.p1_1 # pkg_delete -f fusefs-kmod-0.3.9.p1_1 pkg_delete: package 'fusefs-kmod-0.3.9.p1_1&

misc/compat5x package installs with weird messages

Installing the 7.0-RELEASE package of graphics/xnview, I got some weird messages that seem to come from the misc/compat5x dependency: rm: /var/tmp/instmp.qdjoSl/lib/compat/libc.so.5: Operation not permitted rm: /var/tmp/instmp.qdjoSl/lib/compat/libc_r.so.5: Operation not permitted rm: /var/tmp/i

Re: misc/compat5x package installs with weird messages

Norikatsu Shigemura wrote: On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 18:32:22 -0600 Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: My bets are on noschg flag. Pav, you are exactly right. I have experienced this many times myself. After installing the compat5x package you need to do "chflags -R noschg /var/t

libnjb pkg-plist incorrect?

%%PORTDOCS%%share/doc/libnjb-%%PORTVERSION%%/html/dir_d03f56ed3ef2c0e11ac283c787a57d7a.html is in pkg-plist of libnjb, but I got this file: dir_517a6f2c7427bc36231829858e370602.html Therefore package creation fails. Does this weird filename have something to do with my configuration? Is pkg-

portupgrade: complete failure due to devel/apr-svn

After refreshing all packages in /usr/ports/packages/All, I tried to upgrade all ports on a machine that had the last 'portupgrade -a' a few month (?) ago. I got: # portupgrade --batch -PP -x openoffice.org -a ** Port marked as IGNORE: devel/apr-svn: at line 1115 (evaluated to

ImageMagick-6.4.1-3_1 selftest fails

ImageMagick fails to build for me. I guess it is because I do the build as root while a different user "owns the display". (I do use kdm for login and start the build after su in a Konsole.) Although it sounds like interactive building, IMHO, building a port with default options should not fai

Re: ImageMagick-6.4.1-3_1 selftest fails

Robert Huff wrote: Jan Henrik Sylvester writes: ImageMagick fails to build for me. I guess it is because I do the build as root while a different user "owns the display". (I do use kdm for login and start the build after su in a Konsole.) Built just fine for me, about a

Re: ImageMagick-6.4.1-3_1 selftest fails

David Wolfskill wrote: On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 04:38:02PM +0200, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: ... ImageMagick fails to build for me. I guess it is because I do the build as root while a different user "owns the display". (I do use kdm for login and start the build after su in

Re: ImageMagick-6.4.1-3_1 selftest fails

Kitche wrote: David Wolfskill wrote: My experience was that ImageMagick did build, but it also put up a little window with a message on it. So my feeling is that the OP is correct, and that at least on some versions of FreeBSD (in my case 7.0) that access to an X11 environment is required for th

Re: ImageMagick-6.4.1-3_1 selftest fails

Matthew Donovan wrote: On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 03:47:51PM -0400, Kitche wrote: As you can see from my original log, X is used. X is not required, since it is not used, if I build with 'su -' instead of 'su' (and thus have a clear environment without DISPLAY being set). If the build tries to use

Re: Wine 1.0-rc3 failed build

Naram wrote: > I just updated my ports tree which included the update of Wine to > 1.0-rc3. I attempted to build it and it failed at this point: This is: http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13561 The build with openssl-0.9.8h can be fixed as I described there. Jan Henrik ___

libchk, lib/compat/pkg, indirect dependencies, revision bumps

Trying to clean lib/compat/pkg from old portupgrade leftovers, I used libchk to check which are still needed. I thought with regular portupgrades for all ports, none of them should be needed, since recompiles due to PORTREVISION bumps should have taken care of these. Quite a few were needed.

Re: [CFT] editors/emacs to 24.1

On 07/23/2012 10:04, Ashish SHUKLA wrote: Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. As you already know, it works! Thanks! Specifically, I added 24.1 to bsd.emacs.mk, made it the default, and removed all ports depending on emacs-23.4. I installed print/auctex and java/jde (from the attic)

Re: [CFT] editors/emacs to 24.1

On 07/23/2012 13:39, Ashish SHUKLA wrote: On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 13:32:34 +0200, Jan Henrik Sylvester said: Arabic, which is finally displayed from right-to-left, works in windowed mode, but for me, it does not work correctly with "-nw": While it is displayed correctly in a LANG=e

Re: [CFT] editors/emacs to 24.1

On 07/23/2012 16:26, Ashish SHUKLA wrote: On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 14:20:43 +0200, Jan Henrik Sylvester said: On 07/23/2012 13:39, Ashish SHUKLA wrote: On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 13:32:34 +0200, Jan Henrik Sylvester said: Arabic, which is finally displayed from right-to-left, works in windowed mode

sysutils/testdisk: WITH_NTFS3G in ports.conf nonfunctional

Since you converted sysutils/testdisk to the new options framework, it does not depend on sysutils/fusefs-ntfs anymore, although I have this line in /usr/local/etc/ports.conf: sysutils/testdisk: WITH_NTFS3G I thought the new options framework was backwards compatible and ports-mgmt/portconf does

ports-mgmt/portconf with new options framework

On 10/27/2012 21:32, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 09:26:17PM +0200, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: >> Since you converted sysutils/testdisk to the new options framework, it >> does not depend on sysutils/fusefs-ntfs anymore, although I have this >> l

Re: FreeBSD Port: bison-3.7.5,1 core dumped

On 2/7/21 2:52 AM, Alex V. Petrov wrote: I have problem with bison. During build some ports. during doxygen build: /usr/bin/make -f src/CMakeFiles/doxymain.dir/build.make src/CMakeFiles/doxymain.dir/depend [ 31%] [BISON][constexp] Building parser with bison 3.7.5 cd /usr/ports/devel/doxygen/wo

djbfft, daemontools, ezmlm RESTRICTED -> public domain

D. J. Berstein has put his work into public domain: http://cr.yp.to/distributors.html qmail, djbdns, and ucspi-tcp already have their RESTRICTED removed. djbfft, daemontools, and ezmlm are still RESTRICTED: multimedia/djbfft RESTRICTED= Forbidden to redistribute - we have patches to the distr

redland build failure

Trying to build kde4, I got stuck at redland: mkdir .libs cc -DLIBRDF_INTERNAL=1 -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -DLIBRDF_INTERNAL=1 -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -rpath=/usr/local/lib -o .libs/redland-db-upgrade db_upgrade.o -rpath=/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/lib ../librdf/.libs/librdf.so -L/

ntfsprogs vs. fusefs-ntfs (ntfs-3g) reliability?

Is there a particular reason our ntfsprogs port did not get updated for a year but now it has? So far I did use ntfs-3g for mounting and ntfsprogs for resizing etc. with very few problems. Once on copying many files, two of them were only partially written with error messages "Bad address" and

Re: kdesdk3

Mitja wrote: > kdesdk3 doesn't want to update: > > pofiles.cc:450:5: warning: "YY_STACK_USED" is not defined > pofiles.cc:1518:5: warning: "YY_MAIN" is not defined > In file included from pofiles.cc:249: > /usr/local/include/FlexLexer.h:130: error: expected unqualified-id > before numeric constant

audio/akode PORTREVISION went backwards

At 2008/08/18, audio/akode went from 2.0.2_1,1 to 2.0.2,1 and it is still there. (2.0.2_1,1 had existed since 2008/05/27.) No change with default OPTIONS, though. Cheers, Jan Henrik ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/m

Found CONFLICTS: teTeX-base/texinfo emacs/texinfo open-motif/tcl84 coreutils/firebird2-server

Playing a little with /var/db/pkg/*/+CONTENTS, I found some CONFLICTS, for example: pkg_info: both coreutils-6.9_3 and firebird-server-2.0.3_2 claim to have installed /usr/local/bin/gstat pkg_info: both teTeX-base-3.0_14 and texinfo-4.11 claim to have installed /usr/local/bin/texi2dvi pkg_info

Re: devel/kdesdk3 (kdesdk-3.5.10) not compiling

Guill. Moreno-Socias wrote: >I am trying to install x11/kde3 using portupgrade, but it fails > when making devel/kdesdk3 (kdesdk-3.5.10). [...] > In file included from pofiles.cc:249: > /usr/local/include/FlexLexer.h:130: error: expected unqualified-id > before numeric constant > pofiles.cc:45

Re: devel/kdesdk3 (kdesdk-3.5.10) not compiling

Max Brazhnikov wrote: On Sat, 03 Jan 2009 17:28:35 +0100, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: Guill. Moreno-Socias wrote: >I am trying to install x11/kde3 using portupgrade, but it fails > when making devel/kdesdk3 (kdesdk-3.5.10). kdesdk3 cannot be build with textproc/flex installed (si

OpenLDAP induced PORTREVISION bumps

I just face many large ports requiring updates, although mine depend on openldap23-client, which have not been updated. Thus, I decided to investigate changing openldap23-client to openldap24-client. According to 'libchk -v', only 10 of 29 of my ports bumped actually link to one of the openlda

libtasn1 shlib bump fallout

I know that some people do not agree with the PORTREVISION bumping at all. Anyhow, after the libtasn1 shlib bump there were some ports bumped, but many got missed that have files linking against libtasn1.so.3 according to 'libchk -v'. I found these: cups-pstoraster-8.15.4_2 ekiga-2.0.11_5 ghos

Re: Ports required to rebuild after upgrading Xorg to 7.4

Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote: Did you run portupgrade -rf libxcb? On a related note: I ran above command _before_ doing a full "portupgrade -a". A whole bunch of ports failed to upgrade because A mixture of -rf and a -a upgrade is always problematic, unless you were up-to-date before the l

xorg 7.2 upgrade (using packages) -- some problems

Hello! Why does mergebase.sh not compare files that cause conflicts and deletes, if they are the same? "./lib/X11/fonts/local/fonts.dir" was the same for me in local and X11R6. And then portupgrade with "-P" installed some conflicting ports, because it uses "-f" for package installs: Follo

Portupgrade lynx2.-8-6 compile failure

David Southwell wrote: >Compile failure >./LYCharSets.c: In function `HTMLGetEntityUCValue': >./LYCharSets.c:878: error: `unicode_entities' undeclared (first use in >this function) >Stop in /usr/ports/www/lynx/work/lynx2-8-6/src. I had this problem, too. Though, I have the latest ports tree

failure: portupgrade -f 'autoconf*' 'automake*'

===> autoconf-2.61_1 is already installed You may wish to ``make deinstall'' and install this port again by ``make reinstall'' to upgrade it properly. If you really wish to overwrite the old port of devel/autoconf261 without deleting it first, set the variable "FORCE_PKG_

failure: portupgrade -f 'autoconf*' 'automake*'

Alex Dupre wrote: > Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: > > ===> autoconf-2.61_1 is already installed > > You may wish to ``make deinstall'' and install this port again > > by ``make reinstall'' to upgrade it properly. > > If

failure: portupgrade -f 'autoconf*' 'automake*'

Ade wrote: > On Jul 28, 2007, at 03:03 , Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: > > I think, there should be a '-' in front of every ${BUILD_VERSION}. > > > > Additionally to the one at --program-suffix, there are three more > > missing. > > The appropriate fix

libmtp-0.2.0 does not compile on 6.2

I just tried to portupgrade libmtp, but it runs into a syntax error: Making all in examples cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I..-I/usr/local/include -I../src -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -MT connect.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/connect.Tpo -c -o connect.o connect.c connect.c: I

autoconf removal / Build error: KDE requires autoconf 2.53 or newer (kmastermind)

portupgrade kmastermind-2.2_1 to kmastermind-2.2_2 failed: *** AUTOCONF NOT FOUND!. *** KDE requires autoconf 2.53 or newer What should I do about it? Moreover, portupgrade does not deal with this: autoconf-2.53_4 < needs updating (port has 2.61_2) autoconf-2.59_3 < n

Re: aqbanking update?

How is the effort bringing the aqbanking port up to date going? Thanks, Jan Henrik ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

guile vs. guile2

Now that autogen is at 5.18.10, it really does not build with guile anymore and I cannot cheat and revert the change to guile2. Anyhow, lilypond still has a library dependency on guile and from the discussion on the lilypond mailing list (and other lists), I do not think this is likely going to ch

Incomplete origin in pkg db after: make -C /usr/ports/any/origin/

"make -C /usr/ports/any/origin/ install clean" registers an incomplete origin ("any/" instead of "any/origin") in the package database for most ports or fails completely for ports-mgmt/pkg (on 11.1-RELEASE/amd64). "make -C /usr/ports/any/origin install clean" works fine. I am not sure, if the

Maintainer timeout to fix 4 ports on 10.0?

In December, I fixed a few ports to compile on 10.0: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/185032 submitted: 2013-12-20 (mail to maintainer: 2013-12-06) http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/185033 submitted: 2013-12-20 (mail to maintainer: 2013-12-06) http://www.freebsd.or

Circular dependency, because x264 links ffmpeg

# pkg info -r ffmpeg ffmpeg-2.1.1_1,1: libxine-1.2.4_5 vlc-2.1.2_2,4 libstreamanalyzer-0.7.8_3 x264-0.136.2358_3 # pkg info -r x264 x264-0.136.2358_3: ffmpeg-2.1.1_1,1 ffmpeg0-0.7.16_1,1 opal-3.10.10_2 vlc-2.1.2_2,4 Not good. Since mu

astro/wcslib fails to install

My latest port upgrade (from source via portmaster) on 10.0-RELEASE/amd64 fails at astro/wcslib, which has been bumped after the astro/cfitsio update. It fails to install with: pkg-static: lstat(/usr/ports/astro/wcslib/work/stage/usr/local/bin/HPXcvt): No such file or directory Building astro/wcs

Re: astro/wcslib fails to install

Hi, On 05/08/2014 13:56, Shin-ya Murakami wrote: > Please try with the attached patch. > I had successfully installed HPXcvt with this patch. I can confirm that r353239 only fixes the segfaults during the build but does not give bin/HPXcvt in staging, which still makes the install fail. Since th