matt donovan wrote:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 5:37 AM, Albert Shih wrote:
I think the vim ports is broken.
Nope not broken just takes a long time to grab that patch since it pulls
from FreeBSD ftp localdistfiles mirror under obrien
The port *is* broken:
# fetch
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/Fre
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Helmut Schneider wrote:
matt donovan wrote:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 5:37 AM, Albert Shih
wrote:
I think the vim ports is broken.
Nope not broken just takes a long time to grab that patch since it pulls
from FreeBSD ftp localdistfiles mirror under obrien
The
Hi,
since a week or so portupgrade does not find updates on all of my machines
(~15, all 7.2-RELEASE) anymore:
[r...@bsdhelmut ~]# portversion -v | grep -v "="
amavisd-new-2.6.4_1,1 < needs updating (port has 2.6.4_2,1)
firefox-3.0.13,1< needs updating (port has 3.0.14,1)
l
Helmut Schneider wrote:
since a week or so portupgrade does not find updates on all of my
machines (~15, all 7.2-RELEASE) anymore:
cvsup5.de.freebsd.org seems down - since a few days.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Hi,
/usr/ports/UPDATING says:
portupgrade -o lang/perl5.10 -f perl-5.8.\*
# BATCH=YES portupgrade -o lang/perl5.10 -f perl-threaded-5.8.\*
---> Upgrading 'perl-threaded-5.8.9_3' to 'perl-threaded-5.10.1'
(lang/perl5.10)
---> Building '/usr/ports/lang/perl5.10' with make flags:
-DWITH_THREADS
=
Matthew Seaman wrote:
> Helmut Schneider wrote:
>
>
> > ===> perl-threaded-5.10.1 conflicts with installed package(s):
> > perl-threaded-5.8.9_3
> >
> > They install files into the same place.
> > Please remove them first with pk
Michal Varga wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Helmut Schneider
> wrote:
> > [...]
> > Currently the only solution seems to remove perl.5.8 which as a
> > result deletes all dependencies which requires all ports to be
> > reinstalled.
> >
>
&g
Michal Varga wrote:
> I'm not a heavy Perl user, but I don't remember anything ever melting
> "too much", while doing it this way. Of course, there are things like
> irssi, that break -every time- you reinstall Perl (even the same
> version), but one gets used to it quickly. Then there is the rest
Michal Varga wrote:
> > # pkg_info | wc -l
> > 457
> > #
> >
> > And this machine is even my package-building station!
> >
> > Anyway, portupgrade -af took 45 minutes. g
> >
> Well, it's a dedicated blade after all :) And those 8 cores seem
> pretty nasty, I'm envious.
Well, afaik I even c
Boris Kochergin wrote:
> Helmut Schneider wrote:
> > Michal Varga wrote:
> >
> >
> > > > # pkg_info | wc -l
> >>>457
> > > > #
> > > >
> > > > And this machine is even my package-building station!
> >
Hi,
I upgraded perl 5.8.9 to 5.10.1. I have a single CPAN Module which is
not part of the ports. With 5.8.9 the package was registered as
bsdpan-SNMP-Extension-PassPersist-0.03
With 5.10 the package is not registered anymore. The build process
cpan SNMP::Extension::Persist
prints:
[...]
FreeB
Hi,
I fully understand that the current and past actions on php, png and so
on were very time consuming. Anyway php5-snmp (5.2.12 *and* 5.3.2) are
broken on obviously a few systems, including mine. A PR was opened 2
months ago but I even cannot find a reply from any of the maintainers.
http://www
Matthew Seaman wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 26/04/2010 11:32:45, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I fully understand that the current and past actions on php, png
> > and so on were very time consuming. Anyway php5-sn
Matthew Seaman wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 26/04/2010 12:52:11, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> > Matthew Seaman wrote:
> >
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >> Hash: SHA1
> > >
> >&
Wesley Shields wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 03:20:24PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On 26/04/2010 13:56:56, Wesley Shields wrote:
> > > Thanks for bringing this up. I will take it over, get the plist
> > > fixed up and get it in th
Hans F. Nordhaug wrote:
> I recently upgrade to FreeBSD 8.0 (from 7.2) and suddenly I get a lot
> of "(httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 11" in my logs. I have similar
> problems with amavisd - see
>
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2010-April/thread.html#215757
> I'm have upd
Hans F. Nordhaug wrote:
> * Helmut Schneider [2010-05-02]:
> > Hans F. Nordhaug wrote:
> >
> > > I recently upgrade to FreeBSD 8.0 (from 7.2) and suddenly I get a
> > > lot of "(httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 11" in my logs. I have
> > >
Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 03/05/2010 11:49:35, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> > I guess one can assume that
> >
> > - you already checked RAM with memtest or so.
> > - you already check your hard drive (you mentiened you fsck'ed your
> > hard drive and found er
Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 10/05/2010 24:30:19, Celso Viana wrote:
>
> > I already have Apache 2.0.x installed on a machine, but the
> > "dansguardian" has dependency on apache 1.3.x, how do I run
> > dansguardian with apache 2.0.x?
>
> Put:
>
> APACHE_PORT=www/apache20
>
> into /etc/make.conf
Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 10/05/2010 17:12:47, Helmut Schneider wrote:
>
> > Is there a list of ports-related knobs for make.conf?
>
> Other than /usr/ports/KNOBS you mean?
No. :)
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http:/
Hi,
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=140934
Still patient, but is there a chance to get my backups succeeding again?
Thanks, Helmut
--
No Swen today, my love has gone away
My mailbox stands for lorn, a symbol of the dawn
___
freebsd-ports@
Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 08:49:06AM +0000, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=140934
> >
> > Still patient, but is there a chance to get my backups succeeding
> > again?
>
&
Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 12:09:01PM +0000, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> > Kostik Belousov wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 08:49:06AM +, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > http://www.f
Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 12:30:20PM +0000, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> > Kostik Belousov wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 12:09:01PM +, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> > > > Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > > >
> >
Hi,
I created a PR 2 days ago but it is yet not assigned. Anything wrong
with it?
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/147468
Thanks, Helmut
--
No Swen today, my love has gone away
My mailbox stands for lorn, a symbol of the dawn
___
fre
Doug Barton wrote:
> On 06/06/10 12:14, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> > I created a PR 2 days ago but it is yet not assigned. Anything wrong
> > with it?
>
> Yes. :) In order for the automated tools to work the category/name
> of the port in the synopsis needs to be exact
Hi,
I cannot compile amavisd-new because db42 is not recognized as already
installed:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=147718
As stated in the (unfortunately closed) PR I already removed all
packages and tried from scratch but it still fails.
The point is that the following ports also
Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
> > Helmut 'Ingrid' Schneider wrote:
> >
> >
> > > I cannot compile amavisd-new because db42 is not recognized as
> > > already installed:
> > >
> > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=147718
> > >
> > > As stated in the (unfortunately closed) PR I already remo
Helmut 'Ingrid' Schneider wrote:
> I cannot compile amavisd-new because db42 is not recognized as already
> installed:
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=147718
>
> As stated in the (unfortunately closed) PR I already removed all
> packages and tried from scratch but it still fails.
Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
> >
> >===>Running ldconfig
> > /sbin/ldconfig -m /usr/local/lib
> >===>Registering installation for db42-4.2.52_5
> >===>Returning to build of amavisd-new-2.6.4_6,1
> > Error: shared library "db-4.2.2" does not exist
> > *** Error code 1
> >
> > Stop in /usr/po
Scot Hetzel wrote:
> The use as defined in bsd.port.mk for the IA32_BINARY_PORT variable is
> incorrectly being used in the amavisd-new port:
>
> # IA32_BINARY_PORT
> # - Set this instead of ONLY_FOR_ARCHS if the
> given port
> # fetches
Thomas Steen Rasmussen wrote:
> I am experiencing what seems like the problem in
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=133758
>
> I have net-snmp-5.5 installed on FreeBSD 7.2 i386 and it returns this:
> UCD-SNMP-MIB::memAvailReal.0 = INTEGER: 189072 kB
> UCD-SNMP-MIB::memTotalFree.0 = INT
Thomas Steen Rasmussen wrote:
> I am experiencing what seems like the problem in
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=133758
>
> I have net-snmp-5.5 installed on FreeBSD 7.2 i386 and it returns this:
> UCD-SNMP-MIB::memAvailReal.0 = INTEGER: 189072 kB
> UCD-SNMP-MIB::memTotalFree.0 = INT
Yuri wrote:
> After one of the recent upgrades I only get an empty page from
> wordpress.
While _a_bit_more_ information would be helpdul check the order of the
php modules in your extensions.ini
--
No Swen today, my love has gone away
My mailbox stands for lorn, a symbol of the dawn
_
Hi,
in the past I created a few PRs with patches for important security
updates for typo3. Unfortunately they all timed out.
10 days ago I created a new one:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=149236
I guess it will also time out.
Now, there is another update:
http://www.freebsd.org/c
Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 10:56:44AM +0000, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> > in the past I created a few PRs with patches for important security
> > updates for typo3. Unfortunately they all timed out.
> >
> > What is the time GNATS is waiting for
Hi,
sorry for my impatience but I asked for a repocopy about one week ago
and now I'm wondering how long normally a repocopy takes.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=150937
Thanks, Helmut
--
No Swen today, my love has gone away
My mailbox stands for lorn, a symbol of the dawn
___
Max Brazhnikov wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 18:57:35 + (UTC), Helmut Schneider wrote:
> > sorry for my impatience but I asked for a repocopy about one week
> > ago and now I'm wondering how long normally a repocopy takes.
>
> Submit patch vs existing port ask f
Hi,
a repocopy for typo3 was done recently and I would like to suggest
users to change origin if they want to stay at the 4.3 branch. I guess
UPDATING is the right place to do so but who does so, who
changes/decides that a hint in UPDATING might be useful?
Thanks, Helmut
--
No Swen today, my lo
Wesley Shields wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 11:59:53AM +0000, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> > a repocopy for typo3 was done recently and I would like to suggest
> > users to change origin if they want to stay at the 4.3 branch. I
> > guess UPDATING is the right place to do so
Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Is here console tool, which shows dependency tree of installed ports
> from "required" port to "users"? pkg_tree performs opposite task.
>
> +REQUIRED_BY is flat list, unfortunately.
>
> I need to investigate exact path why this port is installed on my
> system :)
Hi,
To create a new version of a port (let's say typo3) I copy typo3 to
typo3.org. Then I run
sudo make clean && sudo port fetch
sudo rm -r /tmp/typo3*
sudo genplist clean; sudo genplist create /tmp/
As a result on my 8.2 machine $PORTVERSION in pkg-plist is replaced
with %%PORTVERSION%% as defi
Olli Hauer wrote:
> On 2012-03-06 21:30, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > To create a new version of a port (let's say typo3) I copy typo3 to
> > typo3.org. Then I run
> >
> > sudo make clean && sudo port fetch
> > sudo rm -r /tm
Olli Hauer wrote:
> On 2012-03-06 21:30, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > To create a new version of a port (let's say typo3) I copy typo3 to
> > typo3.org. Then I run
> >
> > sudo make clean && sudo port fetch
> > sudo rm -r /tm
Hi,
since friday or so I have a problem with portupgrade:
# portupgrade -av
---> Session started at: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 13:22:41 +0100
---> Skipping 'bsdpan-SNMP-Extension-PassPersist-0.03' because it is
held by user (specify -f to force)
---> Session ended at: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 13:23:19 +0100 (c
Helmut Schneider wrote:
> # portupgrade -av
> ---> Session started at: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 13:22:41 +0100
> ---> Skipping 'bsdpan-SNMP-Extension-PassPersist-0.03' because it is
> held by user (specify -f to force)
> ---> Session ended at: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 1
Hi,
I'd like to release a new version of Typo3, version 4.5:
[helmut@BSDHelmut832 ~/typo3]$ sudo port fetch
===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
===> License GPLv3 accepted by the user
=> typo3_src-4.5.0.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in
/usr/ports/distfiles/.
=> Attempting to fe
Hi Wen,
wen heping wrote:
> Do you mean the fetch error?
Yes.
> Seems typo3_4.5.0 changed download site , now it is:
> http://dl1.typo3.org/TYPO3_4.5.0/introductionpackage-4.5.0.zip
>
> So you should change MASTER_SITES.
Currently
MASTER_SITES=
SF/${PORTNAME}/TYPO3%20Source%20and%20Dummy/TYP
Helmut Schneider wrote:
> Hi Wen,
>
> wen heping wrote:
>
> > Do you mean the fetch error?
>
> Yes.
>
> > Seems typo3_4.5.0 changed download site , now it is:
> > http://dl1.typo3.org/TYPO3_4.5.0/introductionpackage-4.5.0.zip
> >
> >
Hi,
with the release of Typo3 4.5, 4.4 becomes "old stable", 4.3 becomes
"deprecated". Therefore a change at pkg_descr is required. That is the
only change.
Do I need to bump PORTREVISION before I submit the updated port? Is
that mandatory?
I don't like the idea that someone is asked to update h
Jason Helfman wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 05:30:45PM +0000, Helmut Schneider thus spake:
> > Hi,
> >
> > with the release of Typo3 4.5, 4.4 becomes "old stable", 4.3 becomes
> > "deprecated". Therefore a change at pkg_descr is required. Tha
Eitan Adler wrote:
> > Do I need to bump PORTREVISION before I submit the updated port? Is
> > that mandatory?
>
> PORTREVISION should only be changed if you need the users of a port to
> recompile the port.
> Typos and documentation typically don't require such a change.
Thanks.
__
Helmut Schneider wrote:
[mirrors down]
Might be related:
http://sourceforge.net/apps/wordpress/sourceforge/2011/01/27/service-downtime/
Helmut
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To
Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 17:30:45 +0000, Helmut Schneider wrote:
>
> > with the release of Typo3 4.5, 4.4 becomes "old stable", 4.3 becomes
> > "deprecated". Therefore a change at pkg_descr is required. That is
> > the only change
Hi,
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=153950
The repocopy is complete but the port is not available yet. A few
poeple already emailed me so I just would like to know why it is not
available yet. Due to the upcoming release of 8.2?
Thanks, Helmut
Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 07:07:40PM +0000, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> > The repocopy is complete but the port is not available yet. A few
> > poeple already emailed me so I just would like to know why it is not
> > available yet. Due to the upcoming re
Hi,
[helmut@BSDHelmut ~]$ grep -ir latest /usr/ports/www/apache2?
/usr/ports/www/apache20/Makefile:LATEST_LINK= apache20
/usr/ports/www/apache22/Makefile:LATEST_LINK?= apache22
[helmut@BSDHelmut ~]$
So, what's the difference between e.g. "LATEST_LINK=" and
"LATEST_LINK?="?
Thanks, Helmut
___
Chris Rees wrote:
> On 13 February 2011 14:14, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> > [helmut@BSDHelmut ~]$ grep -ir latest /usr/ports/www/apache2?
> > /usr/ports/www/apache20/Makefile:LATEST_LINK= apache20
> > /usr/ports/www/apache22/Makefile:LATEST_LINK?= apache22
> > [helmu
Hi,
I updated ImageMagick from 6.6.6.10 to 6.6.7.10 and a *bunch* of new
ports were installed[1]. Holy...!! Are they really necessary?
Thanks, Helmut
[1]
ORBit2-2.14.19
atk-1.32.0
compositeproto-0.4.2
cups-client-1.4.6
damageproto-1.2.1
dbus-glib-0.88
dconf-0.5.1_3
docbook-4.1_4
docbook-xsl-1.75
Martin Wilke wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 7:10 AM, Helmut Schneider
> wrote:
> > I updated ImageMagick from 6.6.6.10 to 6.6.7.10 and a bunch of new
> > ports were installed[1]. Holy...!! Are they really necessary?
>
> thats happend because svg is now enabled by defaul
Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 11:32:25PM +0000, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> > Martin Wilke wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 7:10 AM, Helmut Schneider
> > > wrote:
> > > > I updated ImageMagick from 6.6.6.10 to 6.6.7.10 an
Warren Block wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Doug Barton wrote:
> > On 03/10/2011 02:40, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> > >
> > > ...most of "my" users won't run Typo3 and X on the same machine.
> > > :)
> >
> > Sounds like it's time
Doug Barton wrote:
> On 03/10/2011 13:29, Warren Block wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Doug Barton wrote:
> > > On 03/10/2011 02:40, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> > > >
> > > > ...most of "my" users won't run Typo3 and X on the same
&
David Demelier wrote:
> On 10/03/2011 00:10, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> > I updated ImageMagick from 6.6.6.10 to 6.6.7.10 and a bunch of new
> > ports were installed[1]. Holy...!! Are they really necessary?
>
> Try defining WITHOUT_GCONF=yes in your /etc/make.conf, SVG support
Doug Barton wrote:
> On 03/23/2011 03:48, Peter Jeffery wrote:
> > If I was looking for the Opera port, I'd look in www-clients and if
> > it wasn't in there then the next thing that I would be doing is hand
> > searching the INDEX file
>
> cd /usr/ports/ && make search name=opera
This would be
Hi,
I need 'cd' in my Makefile. It seems that the variable ${CD} is not
defined and people are using 'cd' instead.
Is there a certain reason for that?
Thanks, Helmut
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/
Doug Barton wrote:
> On 05/24/2011 12:39, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> > I need 'cd' in my Makefile. It seems that the variable ${CD} is not
> > defined and people are using 'cd' instead.
> >
> > Is there a certain reason for that?
>
> Probably
Hi,
While updating ImageMagick from 6.6.7.10 to 6.7.0-2 the build process
says:
===> Configuring for ImageMagick-nox11-6.7.0.2
###
NOTICE: Perl is non-threaded. Building ImageMagick without threads.
#
Daniel Nebdal wrote:
> On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Robert Huff
> wrote:
> >
> > Helmut Schneider writes:
> >
> >> While updating ImageMagick from 6.6.7.10 to 6.7.0-2 the build
> >> process says:
> > >
&g
Hi,
after upgrading squid from 3.1.12 to 3.1.14 I encounter the following
error:
Starting squid.
2011/07/06 22:13:21| cache_cf.cc(376) parseOneConfigFile: squid.conf:20
unrecognized: 'useragent_log'
2011/07/06 22:13:21| cache_cf.cc(376) parseOneConfigFile: squid.conf:21
unrecognized: 'referer_log
Florian Smeets wrote:
> On 06.07.11 22:33, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> > after upgrading squid from 3.1.12 to 3.1.14 I encounter the
> > following error:
> >
> > Starting squid.
> > 2011/07/06 22:13:21| cache_cf.cc(376) parseOneConfigFile:
> > squid.conf:20
Hi,
seems I'm not the only one with problems with net-snmpd 5.7. I created
a new PR a few seconds ago because snmpd core dumps and there are still
a few PRs in the pipe.
While it is only human that errors happen may I suggest to have a
net-snmpd56 port in addition to the most recent one?
Thanks,
Helmut Schneider wrote:
> seems I'm not the only one with problems with net-snmpd 5.7. I created
> a new PR a few seconds ago because snmpd core dumps and there are
> still a few PRs in the pipe.
>
> While it is only human that errors happen may I suggest to have a
> net-s
Hi,
I've been told that dynamic pkg-plists are bad or at least should be
avoided´at most costs.
Now, all my patches for Typo3 seem blocked by a "SPAM Filter" or at
least take 2 days until I get reply. See PR159878-81, I submitted the
patches on tuesday.
So, what should I do? Still create full pk
Mark Linimon wrote:
> Sorry, I did not see your message and emailed you separately.
>
> GNATS has a spamcatcher for > 500k messages (mostly this catches
> viruses). Normally I handle such PRs manually before the cleanup
> process runs, but I forgot to do it this time. (I only took a
> glance.)
Chris Rees wrote:
> On 19 August 2011 08:55, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> > Mark Linimon wrote:
> >
> >> Sorry, I did not see your message and emailed you separately.
> >>
> >> GNATS has a spamcatcher for > 500k messages (mostly this catches
> &
Boris Samorodov wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:11:22 + (UTC) Helmut Schneider wrote:
>
> > I've been told that dynamic pkg-plists are bad or at least should be
> > avoided´at most costs.
>
> > Now, all my patches for Typo3 seem blocked by a "SPAM Filter
Chris Rees wrote:
> On 19 August 2011 11:18, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> > Boris Samorodov wrote:
> >> You may try to reduce pkg-plist changes. Are you speaking about
> >> www/typo* ports? If yes, those ports have hardcoded PORTVERSION
> >> at pkg-plist. One ca
Hi,
I started a long thread at http://forums.cacti.net/about25481.html but it
turns out that FreeBSD 6.3 might be the problem. FreeBSD 6.2 and 7.0-RC1
(see below) are not affected. Here is what I did:
I had an existing cacti infrastructure/cacti server on FreeBSD 6.2.
Everything was fine and
Edwin Groothuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 10:22:31PM +0100, Helmut Schneider wrote:
I started a long thread at http://forums.cacti.net/about25481.html but
it turns out that FreeBSD 6.3 might be the problem. FreeBSD 6.2 and
7.0-RC1 (see below) are not affected. H
Edwin Groothuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 11:33:37PM +0100, Helmut Schneider wrote:
Edwin Groothuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 10:22:31PM +0100, Helmut Schneider wrote:
>>I started a long thread at http://forums.cacti.ne
Hi,
ntop stops with:
[...]
then mv -f ".deps/iface.Tpo" ".deps/iface.Plo"; else rm -f
".deps/iface.Tpo"; exit 1; fi
cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I. -I/usr -I/usr/include -DINET6 -O2 -Dfreebsd7
-DAPPLLIB_EXP=/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/BSDPAN -DHAS_FPSETMASK -DHAS_FLOATINGPOINT_H
-fno
James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, 2008-02-17 at 17:20 +0100, Helmut Schneider wrote:
Hi,
ntop stops with:
[...]
then mv -f ".deps/iface.Tpo" ".deps/iface.Plo"; else rm -f
".deps/iface.Tpo"; exit 1; fi
cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I. -I/usr -
Wesley Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 08:02:13AM -0700, James wrote:
Sounds like an entirely reasonable course of action. The maintainers'
email addresses ought to be in the Makefile for each port.
That would be me. :)
I imagine it's the ntop person you want to
Hi,
I have a few problems with portupgrade, some ports fail with error above:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# portupgrade -fPP snort-2.7.0.1_1 postfix-2.4.6,1
apache-2.0.63
** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed)
! www/apache20 (apache-2.0.63) (Argument must be String c
Stuart Barkley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 at 16:05 +0100, Helmut Schneider wrote:
I have a few problems with portupgrade, some ports fail with error above:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# portupgrade -fPP snort-2.7.0.1_1 postfix-2.4.6,1
apache-2.0.63 ** Listing the failed pa
Stuart Barkley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 at 16:05 +0100, Helmut Schneider wrote:
I have a few problems with portupgrade, some ports fail with error above:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# portupgrade -fPP snort-2.7.0.1_1 postfix-2.4.6,1
apache-2.0.63 ** Listing the failed pa
Hi,
I'm trying to setup mailman and python2.5 in a jail for a long time. With
python2.4 it works like a charm but not with python2.5. Maybe someone here
has a clue what's wrong. I asked 6 months ago at the mailman mailing list
but without success:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alex Vasylenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Helmut Schneider wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# chroot -u root /home/python25/
/usr/local/mailman/bin/mailmanctl
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/local/mailman/bin/mailmanctl", line 107, in
from Mailman import Utils
File &qu
Hi,
first of all I fully understand that all ports are maintained by volunteers.
I also appreciate their work very much.
net-snmp5.4.x is (only for me?!) unusable. Some OIDs don't exist anymore,
some OIDs report wrong values. I tried to bypass those problems by still
using net-snmp5.3.x (which s
Hi,
Is this a local problem?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports]# grep PORTREVISION sysutils/screen/Makefile
PORTREVISION= 4
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports]# make fetchindex
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports]# grep -ir ^screen-4.0.3 /usr/ports/INDEX-7
screen-4.0.3_3|/usr/ports/sysutils/screen|/usr/local|A
Helmut Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports]# grep PORTREVISION sysutils/screen/Makefile
PORTREVISION= 4
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports]# make fetchindex
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports]# grep -ir ^screen-4.0.3 /usr/ports/INDEX-7
screen-4.0.3_3|/usr/ports/sy
Attos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just upgraded my workstation from 6.2 to 7.0 but I haven't been able
to upgrade all the ports.
OpenSSL is giving me problems when trying to upgrade (with
portupgrade). The message I get is that the it's marked as ignore
because it conflicts with the base:
# po
Dennis Kirschling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a wealth of experience with SCO products, but I have to admit I
am stumped with BSD and specifically upgrading a customers Apache from
2.0.55 to 2.0.63 on BSD 5.4. I have downloaded the product, unsipped
it and extracted the tar volume. Wher
Hi,
** Detected a package name change: apache (www/apache22) -> 'apache22'
(www/apache22)
---> Upgrading 'apache-2.2.22_6' to 'apache22-2.2.22_8' (www/apache22)
---> Building '/usr/ports/www/apache22' with make flags: -DWITH_PROXY
-DWITH_PROXY_CONNECT -DWITH_PROXY_FTP -DWITH_PROXY_HTTP -DWITH_LD
Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 9/8/2012 7:28 AM, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> > ** Detected a package name change: apache (www/apache22) ->
> > 'apache22' (www/apache22)
> > ---> Upgrading 'apache-2.2.22_6' to 'apache22-2.2.22_8'
> > (w
Hi Olli,
olli hauer wrote:
> On 2012-09-08 14:28, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> > ** Detected a package name change: apache (www/apache22) ->
> > 'apache22' (www/apache22)
> > ---> Upgrading 'apache-2.2.22_6' to 'apache22-2.2.22_8'
> &g
olli hauer wrote:
> On 2012-09-08 14:57, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> > Hi Olli,
> >
> > olli hauer wrote:
> >
> >> On 2012-09-08 14:28, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> >>> ** Detected a package name change: apache (www/apache22) ->
> >>> &
Helmut Schneider wrote:
> Hi Olli,
>
> olli hauer wrote:
>
> > On 2012-09-08 14:28, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> > > ** Detected a package name change: apache (www/apache22) ->
> > > 'apache22' (www/apache22)
> > > ---> Upgrading
Hi,
ports/169660 is waiting for the maintainer for more than 2 months, any
update here?
Thanks, Helmut
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-un
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
