.
I think there is some minor issue with regard to money market accounts
(specifically, how the account type is represented within aqbanking)
but I have patches to send upstream for it.
Thanks for putting together the patches for the update, and thanks to
amdmi3 for the commits.
--
G. Paul Ziemba
Ports has version 1.45 of Mason. Is anyone doing an update to 2.X?
cheers,
~!paul
--
G. Paul Ziemba
FreeBSD unix:
10:41PM up 42 days, 7:34, 30 users, load averages: 0.29, 0.20, 0.16
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http
5u623...@gmail.com (Muhammad Moinur Rahman) writes:
>Can you give any link towards 2.X branch? Ports tree has 1.45 while CPAN
>has 1.48.
http://search.cpan.org/~jswartz/Mason-2.17/
--
G. Paul Ziemba
FreeBSD unix:
1:56AM up 42 days, 10:49, 29 users, load averages: 0.21, 0.19
5u623...@gmail.com (Muhammad Moinur Rahman) writes:
>I have submitted a PR for Mason 2.
>http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/166952
Great work! Thanks for your efforts. I look forward to using this port.
~!paul
--
G. Paul Ziemba
FreeBSD unix:
11:56AM up 56 days, 20:49, 34
--- 1 root wheel 503 Aug 25 16:40 /tmp/f-86431-DI-FILES.xeyHrwB6
0 -rw--- 1 root wheel0 Aug 25 16:39 /tmp/f-86431-IPC_SAVE.92g9xCCQ
2 -rw--- 1 root wheel 430 Aug 25 16:41
/tmp/f-86431-fetchlog-gsoap.uObJLmDH
0 -rw--- 1 root wheel 0 Aug 25 16:39
/tmp/f-86431-gsoap_2
I think my original reply did not go out on 8/27, so here it is:
do...@freebsd.org (Doug Barton) writes:
>On 08/25/2012 16:58, G. Paul Ziemba wrote:
>> The second scenario exhibits the problem. Here, I delete the distfile
>> and just run portmaster without -F. The fetch
do...@freebsd.org (Doug Barton) writes:
>I will need some time to address this, I'll try to get a patch out by
>the end of this weekend.
Thanks for your efforts Doug. I'm not blocked by this issue but I'll
bet your fix will save time for others down the road.
~!paul
--
G
ry to work up a patch for the first approach and submit
a PR, pending any followups to this message.
--
G. Paul Ziemba
FreeBSD unix:
3:01PM up 143 days, 2:19, 1 user, load averages: 1.15, 0.97, 0.87
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://li
d on top of those.
Julian and others, I am wholly in favor of this capability. I have
been using a similar bsd.port.mk patch for some years based on
the discussions in this thread:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2008-December/051767.html
I also agree with Marcus above regarding t
system, for some reason these libraries get installed (by the
linux* ports) in /usr/compat/linux/usr/X11R6/lib rather than in
/usr/compat/linux/usr/local/lib where many applications expect them.
I have been manually creating symlinks in /usr/compat/linux/usr/local/lib,
e.g.,
cd /usr/compat/linux/usr/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Boris Samorodov) writes:
>"G. Paul Ziemba" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I have been manually creating symlinks in /usr/compat/linux/usr/local/lib,
>> e.g.,
>>
>> cd /usr/compat/linux/usr/local/lib
>> ln -s ../../X11R6/
t would be implemented in the do-patch target
in bsd.port.mk at the end, after patches from PATCHDIR are applied,
and patch Makefiles would, by convention, leave it unmolested.
Have I overlooked some better approach to integrating site-local
fixes?
--
G. Paul Ziemba
FreeBSD unix:
1:31PM up 23:01, 5 u
x27;s in the existing do-patch code above.
3. Does ${OPSYS} belong in the echoed messages for local patches?
--
G. Paul Ziemba
FreeBSD unix:
2:31PM up 2 days, 1 min, 8 users, load averages: 1.36, 1.30, 1.33
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
t
patches from, based on the state of USE_LOCAL_PATCHES? But I was
hoping to augment $(WRKDIRPREFIX)/${CATEGORY}/${PORTNAME}/files
instead of replacing it.
--
G. Paul Ziemba
FreeBSD unix:
6:06PM up 2 days, 3:36, 8 users, load averages: 1.55, 1.38, 1.31
_
when there is a collision in the
base name of two ports? It seems less obvious than
//${CATEGORY}/${PORTNAME}/
--
G. Paul Ziemba
FreeBSD unix:
6:11PM up 2 days, 3:41, 8 users, load averages: 1.58, 1.39, 1.31
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing
variation in the upstream files regardless of whether they are
modified by official ports patches, so doing local patching first
doesn't let you avoid tweaking local patches from time to time.
>Updated version here:
>http://people.freebsd.org/~amdmi3/local-patchdir.patch
It looks good to m
king-2.3.1, libofx-0.8.3,
gwenhywfar-2.6.0, and gnucash-2.2.0 which I have been using for a few
months with no problems.
I haven't gotten around to submitting them, but if you're interested, I'd
be happy to send them your way.
cheers,
~!paul
--
G. Paul Ziemba
FreeBS
A_PATCHES is adequate for
me at the moment. I haven't studied that issue in a couple of years,
so maybe there is a new ports feature addressing it.]
Before I run "poudriere bulk", I rsync my local patch tree to the
ports tree that will be used by poudriere so that it shows up at
/us
day or two.
I'm working with the existing version (1.25.0) because I want
to get the staging support added ASAP.
--
G. Paul Ziemba
FreeBSD unix:
10:16AM up 10 days, 22:45, 16 users, load averages: 1.46, 1.43, 1.37
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org ma
try
192123 [patch] multimedia/zoneminder: Enable STAGE support
--
G. Paul Ziemba
FreeBSD unix:
4:16PM up 12 days, 4:45, 13 users, load averages: 1.26, 1.31, 1.44
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis
instead of the linux-f10-* ports?
thanks,
~!paul
--
G. Paul Ziemba
FreeBSD unix:
9:41AM up 4 days, 1:21, 10 users, load averages: 1.32, 1.29, 1.30
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebs
last eight years (CF the
thread started at <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?gh1l3n$22rv$1>
on Dec 1, 2008, which references this very patch from Dmitry Marakasov).
I have used it in my (admittedly very small) network since then, first
for building ports in situ and more recently with poudri
ction .dynamic:
2950f8 0100 6331 c1..
295108 0100 7231 r1..
295118 0100 0000 7c31 |1..
Note that version_info size here is 0xd8 = 216 decima
, but it did seem to overcome the hanging tab problem. It makes
me think that there is some persistent state in chrome's user directory
that is related to this issue.
I tried building www/chromium 61 with DEBUG, but the build failed, and I
have not pursued it further.
--
G. Paul Ziemba
FreeBSD
can fall back to the assortment of mechanisms
in set_domain().
Does anyone have thoughts on this approach?
--
G. Paul Ziemba
FreeBSD unix:
11:46PM up 4 days, 14:09, 13 users, load averages: 0.20, 0.21, 0.21
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
htt
25 matches
Mail list logo
