Robert Huff wrote:
> Given:
>
> huff@>> pd /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3
> /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3 /var/db/pkg
> huff@>> make -V CP
> /bin/cp
>
> how do I track down where CP gets set? It isn't in the
> Makefile itself; is it in /usr/share/mk/*.mk?
Would it be lik
I looked into ports/editors, to find the port name for koffice, and found a
great number of koffice ports that *seem* to be for foreign language support (I
might be wrong, but there's nothing in the pkg-descr to say one way or another).
My problem is, I don't really want support for all of those l
I don't do enough in sed if I could figure out what it is that the broken
line is TRYING to do, I think maybe I could fix it, I HAVE used sed before, and
I know about the s command, and how it sets it's delimiters. Anyhow, here's the
broken line, and I hope my mailer doesn't decide to break t
according to portupgrade's man page, the -l option sets to
have the output of a portupgrade session, but when I try it, I don't get
anything there. Is there something I'm doing wrong, something that I am
overlooking?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org maili
I'm having trouble with the devel/kdesdk4 port, in trying to update it from the
4.2.1 to the latest in ports which is 4.3.4. I'm using portupgrade, but the
port itself uses cmake to build itself. At first, it gave me no useful output
at all (I hate any make tool that goes out of it's way to hide
I have an interesting thing here: I seem to have found an endless loop in
portmanager. It's *entirely* possible that I'm myself causing this, so I'll
explain, and if you can come up with any hints, I'll be happy to test them,
because I really do like using portmanager.
What my goal is, is to upda
Forget what I questioned before, I found a likely reason for the odd behavior I
was seeing, so I don't need the help really anymore.
Thanks anyhow.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsu
On 08/26/10 01:17, jhell wrote:
On 08/25/2010 21:27, Chuck Robey wrote:
I have an interesting thing here: I seem to have found an endless loop in
portmanager. It's *entirely* possible that I'm myself causing this, so I'll
explain, and if you can come up with any hints, I'
On 09/08/10 18:15, Jerry wrote:
Portmanager did have a nasty bug that involved looping. It was fixed
ages ago though. Are you running the latest version; i.e., "0.4.1_9" on
your system? Run "portmanager -v" to confirm.
Without the '-p' option, portmanager only looks 1 level deep. with the
'-p'
May as well get all my bright ideas out and over with, all at once. You
see, I've spent the last few years exploring other OSes, and finally
decided I was right, way bakc when I was running FreeBSD to begin with.
BUT I have to admit that I saw several good ideas while I was out and
about. I
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
Chuck Robey wrote:
...
This might either turn into a bikeshed or a creative brainstorming. I hope for
the latter, so I take part.
Yeah, if it looked like a flamebait, I would run for the hills myself,
but it looks pretty good so far.
My rule of thumb is to stick to
Anton Berezin wrote:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 04:59:58PM +1100, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 10:36:45PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote:
An example? If a programmer asks you if you want the blotz program (I
make up great fake names, don't I?) hows the user going to know th
I was wondering why ports apparently aren't allowed an obvious freedom,
that of being able to set themselves to run as daemons. A greate long
time past, I seem to remember that there used to be a file
/usr/local/etc/rc.local, which (if it existed) would be automatically
sourced in at the end o
this themselves,
and not to require manual patching to get this done. One reason would
be users (non-technical ones) who install a particular port as a
dependency, and thus never even see the comments about what they should
do to get things working. I can't see any reason NOT to do this,
Edwin Groothuis wrote:
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 08:17:36PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote:
activate the port, and if so, the port would add a line of the form
'portname_enable="YES"', and this would make your new port operate.
Well, it seems from what I see of my new system, th
Scot Hetzel wrote:
On 11/18/07, Edwin Groothuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 08:17:36PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote:
activate the port, and if so, the port would add a line of the form
'portname_enable="YES"', and this would make your new port op
me. I was never saying, or meaning, that ports
could not do it, I was saying they did not do it, no one I have seen
implemented that behavior. Yes, you're certainly right, they can,
they've had the ability all along.
Naram Qashat
Chuck Robey wrote:
Naram Qashat wrote:
I was wondering if there are any a2ps users who have HP DeskJet or
OfficeJet printers? I wanted to confirm something before i sent some
patches upstream. It's the size of the print offsets, which are smaller
on those printers. The default setup in the a2ps-letterdj port is wrong
for me, and
Anybody who has skype up and working, and has a few free minutes, would
you care to help me test my brand new skype setup? Write me privately, ok?
Thanks
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-port
I sam working to try getting a current flash working, and I found
something that seems screwy. I've had pr0blems with the way that ports
do/don't respect LOCALBASE/X11BASE so far, and while I guess I was
wrong, I think I would ask someone else to check this ... the
www/linux-firefox-devel (and
Gergely CZUCZY wrote:
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 11:43:35PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
Gergely CZUCZY wrote:
echo 'sevice_enable="YES"' >> /etc/rc.conf.local
Yes, I think we all know how to go about this manually. The question
at hand is whether or not it's possible or desirable to create the
pos
Doug Barton wrote:
Jason C. Wells wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Jason C. Wells wrote:
What I am trying to do is to build 30 or so packages including the
big ones like X, kde, gnome, plus all of their dependencies on a
build host and then use pkg_add on various machines. I ha
Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ade Lovett wrote:
On Dec 03, 2007, at 10:12 , Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
I have about 20 responses in private email and only the ones you
have seen in public are in this category
Enough said. There are currently ~180 people
He took his roadshow over to -questions. Funny thing is, he has set of
folks that are all just like him, and they are all merrily
re-engineering ports. I figure he's going to sic one of his crew to
come back and try again to talk folks into this. Seeing as no one here
who has the ability to
Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On Monday, December 03, 2007 13:53:06 -0500 "Aryeh M. Friedman"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Have you ever attempted to install the individual ports of a mega
metaport?
Of course I have. And I haven't run into any problems that weren't
solvable.
Before you waste any m
Need to do some python work, using a lot of FreeBSD's base libs, and I
was wondering, if any ports have swigged the FreeBSD libs? I'll do it
if I must, just trying to save me some work.
Thanks.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.
Paul Schmehl wrote:
Here's a hint that would help a *ton* of users. Don't try to install a
port until your ports tree is up to date. Completely up to date - as
is, run portsnap or cvs or cvsup *first*, *then* try to install your port.
I have several possible solutions (contact me privately i
Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck Robey wrote:
Paul Schmehl wrote:
Why the silly games? I get the feeling that Aryeh is honestly not
understanding that he's trying to change the basic way that things
get done in FreeBSD. He doesn't see
Vivek Khera wrote:
On Dec 3, 2007, at 3:40 PM, Chuck Robey wrote:
Need to do some python work, using a lot of FreeBSD's base libs, and I
was wondering, if any ports have swigged the FreeBSD libs? I'll do it
if I must, just trying to save me some work.
Not understanding your
Xin LI wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck Robey wrote:
Need to do some python work, using a lot of FreeBSD's base libs, and I
was wondering, if any ports have swigged the FreeBSD libs? I'll do it
if I must, just trying to save me some work.
py-freebsd?
Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
*PLEASE ONLY REPLY TO ME OR [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Omigod!!
For Gods sake, could you PLEASE not have folks reply to the list! We
have been sufficiently bombarded with this already. If you must have
the replies public, then
I need some help on using gpg with my mail client, and I use seamonkey's
mail handler to access my dovecot imap server. I see that Enigmail is
the thing that normally handles getting gpg to work with seamonkey, but
there are two possible ports that zi might use, and they don't both
have pkg-d
I am trying (with notiable lack of success so far, but I'll be posting
to -questions about that, so don't answer it) to get seamoneky to
cooperate with GNUpg ... so I saw a reference to another port,
security/kgpg, and I went to build it. Unfortunately, kgpg has a
dependency tp gnupg1, and I a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm trying to add enigmail to seamonkey, and not having much fun doing it.
I'm rather hoping someone here can help me.
First, I'm using Seamonkey's mailer (and not Thunderbird) because it handled
the formatting of fixed-width-font lines better. Where
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Well, assuming that I can't get enigmail-seamonkey fixed up, I was wondering
if I could get a recommendation about a mailer. This following is my list of
requirements, so please don't lets open up a mailer free-for-all (I like the
ACME mailer!) unless
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert Huff wrote:
> Chuck Robey writes:
>
>> Well, the enigmail-seamonkey install has the same somewhat bare
>> hint, so I went looking for the Tools->AddOns menu, but that's a
>> lost cause, it's not there
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Back last time I was last active,Satoshi Asami was the "Portsmeister". I
dunno if that term is used anymore, but I need to find out if one person is in
charge of ports, or if it's a group of folks, and whichever it is, what their
name(s) are?
In case
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 08:36:32PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote:
>> Back last time I was last active,Satoshi Asami was the "Portsmeister". I
>> dunno if that term is used anymore, but I need to find ou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alex Dupre wrote:
> Chuck Robey ha scritto:
>> I'm lost. Anyone gotten the enigmail-seamonkey port to work?
>
> Well, I suppose you never manually installed (or googled about
> installing) an xpi with seamonkey. Simply &q
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 08:36:32PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote:
>> Back last time I was last active,Satoshi Asami was the "Portsmeister". I
>> dunno if that term is used anymore, but I need to find ou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 08:36:32PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote:
>> Back last time I was last active,Satoshi Asami was the "Portsmeister". I
>> dunno if that term is used anymore, but I need to find ou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chess Griffin wrote:
> * Chuck Robey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-17 23:28:30]:
>
>
>> Any mailers handling those 3 requirements?
>
> Some that come to mind are: mozilla-thunderbird, claws-mail,
> evolutio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Started in -questions, but redirected to -ports with the change in
direction of discussion (you'll see).
Rudy wrote:
> Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
>
>>> rm /usr/ports/distfiles/flashplugin/fp7_archive.zip
>>>
>>
>> An other way to fix it in some ways is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Quoting Chuck Robey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Thu, 10 Jan 2008 21:05:16
> -0500):
>
>> I actually got the linux flash9 working. Why didn't I post it, put in a
>> patch? Because one of
inux-firefox, ones that told me it couldn't find a aprticular library, but
when I located the library that it couldn't find, and moved it to the
compat tree, the error evaporated. Once I got finished with all this
dance, flash9 worked fine using linux-firefox.
> Thanks to all,
>
&
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Boris Samorodov wrote:
> Hello Chuck,
>
>
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:54:31 -0500 Chuck Robey wrote:
>
>> As an example, the
>> flash9 plugin needed a linux lib, libdl.so (I think it was .so.2). If I
>
> I wrote t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Quoting Chuck Robey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:54:31 -0500):
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>>> Quoting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Quoting Chuck Robey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:08:50
> -0500):
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Boris Samorodov wrote:
>>> He
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Jan 14, 2008, at 3:55 PM, Christoffer Strömblad wrote:
>> Having looked through much of the available documentation one thing
>> continues to elude me... Is it possible to specify globally how many
>> CPUs are available when co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Boris Samorodov wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:08:50 -0500 Chuck Robey wrote:
>
>> Anyhow, I said I made no effort to record what I did, and if in this case
>> I misremembered, please don't take it as an insult to your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Jan 15, 2008, at 11:34 AM, Chuck Robey wrote:
>>> The quality of the Makefiles or similar used by individual ports varies,
>>> and many of them are not safe to compile in a multithreaded fashion.
>>&
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Boris Samorodov wrote:
> OK, let's leave libdl an all concerned with it in the past. And
> let's concentrate at port errors (ports with errors?).
>
>> I haven't sent any of this to emulation. I dislike crossposting without
>> some truly major reason
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Boris Samorodov wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 14:30:47 -0500 Chuck Robey wrote:
>> Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>
>>> _All_ pure infrastructure ports install into LINUXBASE.
>
>> Just so I have an example of things doing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Boris Samorodov wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:10:15 -0500 Chuck Robey wrote:
>
>> All those libraries need to be found
>> by the flash9 plugin library.
>
> Please, give me strict instructions how to repeate (what to do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Quoting Chuck Robey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:34:23
> -0500):
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Boris Samorodov wrote:
>>> On T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brodey Dover wrote:
> So I'm reading your response and thinking, okay I'll do this tomorrow.
> But then you mentioned, "that is not your error...but." I can program,
> what the hey, let's look at the error and see what is upwell I made
> the follow
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The pkg-descr's for the ports cups and cups-base, which by the name have
confusing titles, should at the very, very least give a word or two as to
the difference between those two ports, but instead, they are duplicates,
very obviously directly lifted
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm using pkgdb because I wanted to try portupgrade, and it required it. My
problem is that it's doing procedures, asking for a decision on my part, but I
can't make any guess how to answer it, because the prompt is fairly meaningless
to me. Here is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anyone know if we have any port that allows conversion of rtf docs to anything
else like maybe ps, pdf, html or maybe even plain ASCII text?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> Chuck Robey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I'm using pkgdb because I wanted to try portupgrade, and it required it. My
>> problem is that it's doing procedures, asking for a decision on my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Tournoij wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 02:39:36PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
>> Anyone know if we have any port that allows conversion of rtf docs to
>> anything
>> else like maybe ps, pdf, html or maybe even plain ASCII
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Parv wrote:
> in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> wrote Chuck Robey thusly...
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> I'm using pkgdb because I wanted to try portupgrade, and it
>> requi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm not personally asking for help on this one, because I can get this one
easily on my own, but as an experiment, I decided to try to use portupgrade to
update my qt4 installation. You might remember, I was asking for some help on
different promps th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
>
> On Mar 29, 2008, at 17:53 , Chuck Robey wrote:
>> I finally found that port: it wasn't named qt4-qmake, i found it in
>> ports/devel/qmake. Like I said, no problem with me, but I think
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have been scouring all the data I can, to find printers that do duplex
printing (that means doublesided printing). I found 3 models, but two of them
(the HP C7280 and the Canon PIXMA MX850) have no public drivers I can find. The
third, which is the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 12:43:08PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
>> 1) I can't determine which (if any) of the PIPS ports support the RX680, and
>
> Based on a quick look at the pips ports, the RX680 is not curre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> On Tue, 06 May 2008 12:43:08 -0400
> Chuck Robey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> I have been scouring all the data I can, to find pr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> On Tue, 06 May 2008 12:43:08 -0400
> Chuck Robey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> I have been scouring all the data I can, to find pr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> On Wed, 07 May 2008 14:43:32 -0400
> Chuck Robey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [snip Kyocera FS-1030D]
>> Thanks, Gary. Took me quite a while to find this baby, because it seems that
>&g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joakim Fogelberg wrote:
> On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 6:43 PM, Chuck Robey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> I have been scouring all the data I can, to find printers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 21:55:18 +0200 (CEST)
> "Remko Lodder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, June 21, 2008 9:09 pm, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
>>> On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 18:51:15 +0200
>>> Remko Lodder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm having problems building this, it dpoesn't see it's own defintion for symbol
avahi_init_i18n (it's defined it it's own code but I guess not linked in). I
went and googled it, it's apparently been spotted as a problem with all
avahi-gtk versions at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm seeing some odd display problems, and I need to get somebody else to verify
for me if it's a pan-FreeBSD problem, or if perhaps I have some oddity with my
ghostcript installation.
My problem is, on doc files from the Xorg project, *.PS.gz files (a
the
way they should be.
>
> Chuck Robey wrote:
>> Tim Kellers wrote:
>>
>>> Send me one, I have gv installed (FreeBSD 7.0-Stable Xorg 7.3_1).
>>>
>>
>> Great, it's attached, I really appreciate this.
>>
>>
>>> Chuck Rob
only need to troubleshoot this now, there's something
screwy about gs's font handling.
>
> Tim
>
>
> Chuck Robey wrote:
> Tim Kellers wrote:
>
>>>> 55 completely blank pages
>>>>
>
> well, thanks very much, Tim. You and Phil Ost
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Philipp Ost wrote:
> Chuck Robey wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Tim Kellers wrote:
>>
>>> 55 completely blank pages
>>
>>
>> well, thanks very much
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Philipp Ost wrote:
> Chuck Robey wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Tim Kellers wrote:
>>
>>> 55 completely blank pages
>>
>>
>> well, thanks very much
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Max Brazhnikov wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:21:32 +0300, Nikolay Tychina wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> i installed ktorrent3 and it seems to be very slow while checking pieces.
>> (~2mb per second)
>> (Deluge do it much more faster, i didn't try any other
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jonathan wrote:
> Chuck Robey wrote:
>> I finally found an odd fix, not sure why it worked this way, but I thought to
>> pass it along on the hope that maybe it will work for you as well as it did
>> for
>> me. My max uplo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm busy trying to use portmanager to get me to kde4.2, but I'm having problem
in updating my misc/localedata port. Portmanager has decided misc/localedata
needs to get rebuilt, and for some reason, that it needs to patch my
/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port/mk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
RW wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 14:40:08 -0400
> Chuck Robey wrote:
>
>> Here's the portmanager listing, maybe someone here can tell me what's
>> causing portmanager to want to patch my bsd.port.mk, and why the
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert Noland wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 21:00 -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
> RW wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 14:40:08 -0400
>>>> Chuck Robey wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Here's the portmanage
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Doug Barton wrote:
> Chuck Robey wrote:
>> Just before sending my mail, I took a look at the cvs log, last entry is from
>> more than 6 months ago, unless something is somehow fubared with my archive.
>> If
>> it si
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I can't figure out why (because the Makefile sure seems fine) but whenever I try
to install the phonon-xine port, it comes back and tells me it doesn't:
make: don't know how to make install. Stop
I can't see anything about the port that would do this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
someone's being very lazy here. I decided to learn a bit of qt4, so I went
looking at the dozen different ports of qt4-* in ports/devel. Whoever did those
ports copied the description of the entire qt (not even noting what version it
is) to every s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Doug Barton wrote:
> Marco Bröder wrote:
>> On Tue March 24 2009 19:24:44 Chuck Robey wrote:
>>
>>> OTOH, the KDE folks deserve an attaboy for NOT doing this to folks.
>> Please post your insults somewhere else
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
matt donovan wrote:
>
> Chuck is more complaining about the QT4 ports descriptions since he does
> not get it that all of it is required to program in QT4. so of course it
> will all have the same description since it all comes from one tarball
> thi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I cc'd flz because I saw an email from March of 2008 which announces that
Florent Thoumie (flz) himself deleted the XFree86-4 port.
I need to understand why all support for XFree86 has been removed from our
ports. It doesn't make sense to me. Here a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
matt donovan wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Mark Linimon <mailto:lini...@lonesome.com>> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 01:13:46PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
> > I need to understand why al
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert Noland wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 22:36 -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
>
> I recently got kde4.2 working on my home box, and all the neat eye candy
> things
> that are added, I'll have to see, maybe you're right, XFre
90 matches
Mail list logo
