;
> -DXS_VERSION=\"0.29\" -DPIC -fPIC "-I/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/mach/CORE"
> BerkeleyDB.c
> BerkeleyDB.xs: In function `XS_BerkeleyDB__Common_compact':
> BerkeleyDB.xs:3565: syntax error before `end_key'
> BerkeleyDB.c:5276: `end_key' undeclared (fi
le-Build, too.
Currently I've made patches (copy version-related codes from
0.2801) to solve this problem temporary, can you help me to
permanent avoid this problem?
Regards,
--
Cheng-Lung Sung - clsung@
pgp8zKbRnhStu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
{'lib/version.pm' => '$(INST_LIBDIR)/version.pm'},
PL_FILES=> {},
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 03:20:06PM -0500, Ken Williams wrote:
> Thanks. I'll work with John Peacock to resolve this problem. I
> think we'll need to make ver
bad idea. Would you mind to change snort_flags to "-Dq -u nobody -g nobody"
> or "-Dq -u snort -g snort" in /usr/local/etc/rc/snort? Personally I prefer
> using the "-t" option even more.
>
> Thanks and Regards, Helmut
--
Alan Cheng-Lung Sung - clsung@
pgpNX0dPbCKfi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ency. I myself prefer the latter. I guess
> it needs further discussion to make a consensus.
>
> And, note for case 1: If some modules are needed for some features in
> newer version, it should use versioned dependency instead and specify
> the minimum ver
> Am 19.04.2007 um 12:25 schrieb Konstantin Saurbier:
>
> >
> > Am 19.04.2007 um 06:02 schrieb Cheng-Lung Sung:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>How about make it as rubygem-rrdtool? Since it depends on
> >>rubygem-hoe, and rubyforge also provide Ru
any software project)
> a harmful thing, as opposed to modularizing. I haven't
> looked at those new Kwiki snapshots, but is it too hard
> to update all those p5-Kwiki-* ports instead of merging
> them into the main one?
>
> Never mind if it's too much work.
Just committed.
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 01:08:51PM +0400, Davaeron wrote:
> When it will be commited? How long to wait?
>
> Past...
> ...
--
Cheng-Lung Sung - clsung@
pgpudtVLo5Tlz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ot found, no access)
>
> This is the actual file now:
> <http://www.snort.org/dl/current/snort-2.6.0.2.tar.gz>
>
> Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> Adjunct Information Security Officer
> The University of Texas at Dallas
> http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/securi
the deps of forks.pm
> are in the
> collection or not. So, what I'm asking for is some help to port forks.pm
> to the collection.
> I would really appreciate that.
>
> All files can be found at http://bbb.pean.org/junk/npretty/
> And the forks module:
> http:/
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 07:10:24AM +0200, Peter Ankerst??l wrote:
> Thank you very much!
> It seems to work fine _but_ the dependency-list is incomplete and
> devel/p5-reaper does not exist in the ports-collection.
I know that :)
see also ports/104321
--
Cheng-Lung Sung
11 matches
Mail list logo
