Hi All,
I've received a request to update the security/openssl-devel port to
1.1.1 (see https://bugs.freebsd.org/230679).
When 1.1.0 was added to the tree, I recall that I've had discussions
about the name of the port (openssl11, openssl-devel). Can't find the
thread, but we ended up with se
On 2018-08-19 0:25, Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
Bernard,
Given the silly way that the openssl crew have decided to name their
releases I think this is a good approach for the moment. I wonder how
they'll number an update to 1.1 :) (1.1A 1.2?) or what an update to
1.1.1 - a rod for their own back,
Hi,
FreeBSD 12 has switched to OpenSSL 1.1 in 1200085
(https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/r339270) and there's
considerable fall-out in packages as a result.
The fall-out in packages should align nicely with the results of
building with security/openssl-devel or security/openssl111 (s
On 2018-10-17 0:26, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Hi po...@freebsd.org
cc br...@freebsd.org maintaine= of ports/security/openssl
On current, 12.0-ALPHA9, this kills pkg:
pkg install openssl
uname -r# 12.0-ALPHA9
cd /usr/src
cat .ctm_status # sr
On 2018-11-12 19:13, Leander Schäfer wrote:
Hello,
databases/mariadb103-server doesn't want to build any more. I use
poudriere to build own local package repositories. It seems like one of
the two last updates broke databases/mariadb103-server port for me:
- 12 Nov 2018 16:58:52 or
- 10 Nov 2018
On 2020-12-04 12:29, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Am I the only one who sees this (critical) problem after upgrade from
MariaDB 10.3.23 to newer version (10.3.25 or 10.3.27)?
There is our customized fine-tuned /usr/local/etc/my.cnf for years
untouched by pkg install or pkg upgrade. After the last
On 2015-12-03 14:22, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
On 4/12/2015 12:02 AM, Ruud Boon wrote:
Hi,
Thnx for maintaining the letsencrypt port!
I’m wondering if you have any plans to upgrade to the just release
v0.1.0?
Cheers,
Ruud
You're welcome :)
Bernard (cc'd) just landed the 20151123 update 2 days
On 2015-12-03 14:22, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
On 4/12/2015 12:02 AM, Ruud Boon wrote:
Hi,
Thnx for maintaining the letsencrypt port!
I’m wondering if you have any plans to upgrade to the just release
v0.1.0?
Cheers,
Ruud
You're welcome :)
Bernard (cc'd) just landed the 20151123 update 2 days
On 2015-12-03 16:28, Ruud Boon wrote:
Awesome!!
Thnx again!
On 03 Dec 2015, at 16:11, Bernard Spil wrote:
On 2015-12-03 14:22, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
On 4/12/2015 12:02 AM, Ruud Boon wrote:
Hi,
Thnx for maintaining the letsencrypt port!
I’m wondering if you have any plans to upgrade to the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2016-06-28 16:58, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> +--On 28 juin 2016 10:30:10 -0400 Dan Langille wrote:
> |> On Jun 28, 2016, at 7:56 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> |>
> |>
> |>
> |> +--On 27 juin 2016 17:22:56 -0400 Dan Langille wrote:
> |> | I've been wor
On 2016-07-24 14:25, Jim Ohlstein wrote:
Hello,
On 07/24/16 05:42, Mark J. Carpio wrote:
Hello all,
I am seeing an issue when attempting to update mariadb10.1
uname:
FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE-p4 #0: Sat May 28 12:23:44 UTC 2016
r...@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
On 2016-08-06 23:17, Mark Felder wrote:
On Sat, Aug 6, 2016, at 07:34, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
On 6/08/2016 7:23 AM, Michael Grimm wrote:
> Hi —
>
> Kubilay Kocak wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately you are yet one more example of a user that's been left in
>> the lurch without information or recourse wonde
On 2016-08-23 14:42, Matt Smith wrote:
On Aug 22 20:39, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
ports-committers is a *NEVER POST DIRECTLY TO* list, so, moving it to
ports@ where this belongs a lot more.
+--On 22 août 2016 20:30:15 +0200 Bernard Spil
wrote:
| Curious to know how we should procede with the
On 2016-08-24 22:08, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Bernard Spil writes:
Today new vulnerabilities with (3)DES and BlowFish were made public
You're referring to something different than the HTTPS/OpenVPN
attacks? Because it really wouldn't be accurate to describe those
as vulnerabilit
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Bernard Spil wrote:
> 2016-08-27 11:18 GMT+02:00 Dirk Meyer :
>> Hallo Ollivier Robert,
>>
>>> [01:19:54] >> Failed ports: lang/go14:build security/libssh2:build
>>> devel/libevent2:build archivers/libarchive:bu
ongs a lot more.
>>
>> +--On 22 août 2016 20:30:15 +0200 Bernard Spil wrote:
>> | Curious to know how we should procede with the upgrade of the OpenSSL
>> | port to 1.1.0!
>>
>> All ports need to work with it, I'm sure software like BIND9 do not build
>> with
On 2016-08-30 17:45, Doug Barton wrote:
Since the last commit to the mariadb10* ports the resulting binaries
dump core on 9.3-RELEASE-p43, even for a simple --help option. I am
assuming that is not the intended result
Doug
Hi Doug,
Nope, that is not intended. Assume this is the 10.0.27 u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2016-09-01 11:07, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 31 Aug 2016, at 19:03, Doug Barton wrote:
>>
>> August 31, 2016 12:37 AM, "Bernard Spil" wrote:
>>> On 2016-08-30 17:45, Doug Barton wrote:
>>>
>>>
On 2016-11-10 3:34, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Miroslav Lachman wrote on 2016/11/09 15:43:
Please update port to 10.1.19. It includes critical fixes
https://jira.mariadb.org/browse/MDEV-10977
https://jira.mariadb.org/browse/MDEV-10394
We are getting following error on some machines too.
ERROR] In
On 2017-04-13 13:43, Rafael Henrique da Silva Faria wrote:
Hi everyone, I'm trying to compile Heimdal with LibreSSL on a server,
but there is a odd problem.
Actually, I'm updating a working server, updated the LibreSSL version,
and tried to recompile all dependent ports with "portmaster -fr
libr
On 2017-04-18 21:45, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Miroslav Lachman wrote on 2017/03/31 15:31:
I don't know if it was "pkg" fault or mariadb101-server and
mariadb101-client conflict.
I did standard "pkg upgrade" and at the end I have half files of
mariadb101-client missing:
# pkg check -Ba
Checking
On 2017-03-03 18:35, Калоян Механджийски wrote:
Hello
I tried about 1 year ago Galera cluster with MySQL and it didn't work
out so back then I tried as I tried today MariaDB 101 with Galera
cluster.
I see that both Galera and MariaDB ports are being modified but the
combined configuration don't
Hi All,
I've been maintaining a port for OpenSSL 1.1.1 for myself for a while,
the port is at version 1.1.1.p3 as of today (see
https://github.com/Sp1l/ports/tree/master/security/openssl-master). It
works well with ${USESDIR}/apache.mk and DEFAULT_VERSIONS=
ssl=openssl-devel.
A while ago I
On 2018-03-21 17:53, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 04:55:59PM +0100, Bernard Spil wrote:
I'm open to suggestions on keeping both version 1.1.0 and 1.1.1 in the
tree,
Well, there is a -devel port to keep the development version of
OpenSSL,
no need to have more tha
Hi all,
Just noticed that the Apache project has removed the patches they had
for 2.2.34.
http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/patches/apply_to_2.2.34/
Combined with the security update of 2.4 branch to 2.4.33 leads me to
believe that Apache 2.2 is now vulnerable and no patches will be
prov
There's been no-one wanting to keep Apache 2.2 that has come forward.
Expect www/apache22 to be removed later in the week. Cleanup of
Mk/Uses/apache.mk after that.
2018-03-27 14:52 GMT+02:00 Bernard Spil :
> Hi all,
>
> Just noticed that the Apache project has removed the patche
et me and apache@ know if you can
update the port to use 2.4 or if there's a different port we should be
pointing to in MOVED.
Thank you for your cooperation!
With kind regards, Bernard Spil (with hat apache@)
2018-04-08 12:57 GMT+02:00 Bernard Spil :
> There's been no-one wanting
m/freebsd/freebsd-ports/blob/master/www/mod_log_sql
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 12:52 PM, Łukasz Wąsikowski
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> W dniu 2018-04-11 o 20:29, Bernard Spil pisze:
>>>
>>> > You are all maintainer of a port that depends on www/apa
28 matches
Mail list logo
