Hi!
I'd like to thank you for the quick response to squid 2.6
release. I tried your patches and installed it in production
today, but some major problems made me revert to 2.5.
1. I use transparent squid with ipfw. I don't enable PF or
IPF transparent options. But without them, squid doesn't
see
I wonder if it's possible to resolve the situation when
(defined(WITH_GNUTLS) && !defined(WITHOUT_SSL)) in a
friendlier way than a simple IGNORE. I have WITH_GNUTLS
in my make.conf and I don't have WITHOUT_SSL there. It
would be great if you could make the port choose on its own,
either way would
This patch introduces a very simple, but handy (imho) framework
into bsd.sites.mk:
http://people.freebsd.org/~sat/diffs/bsd.sites.macros.diff
1. (A tad) cleaner ports Makefiles:
Write MASTER_SITES=FOOBAR instead of
MASTER_SITES=${MASTER_SITE_FOOBAR} and get away
with it
2. Abbreviations
Write M
On 7/26/06, Shaun Amott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 03:37:37PM +0100, Florent Thoumie wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 17:18 +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> > 2. Abbreviations
> > Write MASTER_SITES=SF and mean SOURCEFORGE
>
> I don't quite
On 7/26/06, Andrew Pantyukhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This patch introduces a very simple, but handy (imho) framework
into bsd.sites.mk:
http://people.freebsd.org/~sat/diffs/bsd.sites.macros.diff
I added some more default subdirs:
http://people.freebsd.org/~sat/diffs/bsd.sites.macros
On 8/7/06, Dan Reinholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When trying to build the audacious port on FreeBSD
6.1:
Please try to deinstall the old one before compiling and
report results here. It worked for me.
Thanks!
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing l
--- Original message ---
From: Lapo Luchini
To: po...@freebsd.org
Cc: infofar...@freebsd.org, m...@freebsd.org, s...@freebsd.org
Sent: 7.9.'10, 20:39
Dear port committers,
I understand that infofarmer@ and miwi@ have no more enough free
time to be hyper-active about those and other
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 06:23:14PM -0200, Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 17:53:48 -0200
> Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This works, but it is not clear why %%whatever%% macros fail silently.
>
> The point is not exactly "fail silently", but why t
On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 03:22:35PM -0800, Xin LI wrote:
> Martin Nilsson wrote:
> > I know that we have a ports freeze but FF 2.0.0.8 have some very serious
> > rendering bugs affecting most modern page layouts so it is not suitable
> > to ship with any release.
>
> Yes, I think the change is triv
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 03:32:44PM +0100, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
> The browser-prefs.js file indeed isn't part of the tarball, but gets
> anyway installed on my system:
>
> > pkg_info -W
> /usr/local/lib/linux-netscape-navigator/defaults/pref/browser-prefs.js
> /usr/local/lib/linux-netscape-navigat
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 07:13:04AM -0800, Jason C. Wells wrote:
> ...
> Not all dependencies had a package built for them. For my list of 31 ports
> that I actually desired to build there was a dependency list (make
> all-depends-list) of 758 ports. Of those 758 ports there were 427 packages
>
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 10:49:35AM +0100, Lapo Luchini wrote:
> Is there a way to discriminate direct dependencies fro indirect
> ones, except from reading every single Makefile? (and knowing
> to full extent what USE_GNOME and similar lines really do take
> in as deps)
You can cd some/port/&&make
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 11:00:32PM +0100, Alex Dupre wrote:
> Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> > You can cd some/port/&&make depends
>
> One way only. It would be more useful to know which installed ports
> directly depend on a specific port.
As an obvious working (but n
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 05:01:35AM -0500, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
> As has been hashed out in -ports@ over the last few days there is at
> least a need to examine weither or not the current ports system should
> remain as is or potentially be re-engineered in the future (estimates
> if and when ne
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 04:38:39AM -0500, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
> I have used FreeBSD since '95 and except for jerks like you
> have really enjoyed it.
Are you quite sure it would be there to enjoy if not for jerks
like us? :)
___
freebsd-ports@freebs
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 07:01:15PM +0200, clemens fischer wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 17:21:10 +1100 Peter Jeremy wrote:
>
> > Note that UFS is a database: If I've understood you correctly, the
> > main problem is that there is no appropriate index to map a port
> > directory to an installed pack
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 12:15:09PM +0200, Johan Hendriks wrote:
> I have a small question
>
> After the update of a compat port i get the following errors
> after installing a port!
>
>
>
> Updating the pkgdb ...
>
> Operation not permitted - /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/libc.so.5
Try somet
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:07:54PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:35:30PM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> > 15 ??? 2008 10:21 ??, Brooks Davis ?? :
> > > Sadly, the author's licensing terms will limit the adoption of lzma.
> > > The BSD license is well
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 02:42:24PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
> That's well hidden (DOC/lzam.txt in the tarball). Someone
> should produce some sort of lzma-lite distribution that only
> does the basics. Then this could be a practical option.
Unfortunately, a closer look dispelled the hope. The
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 12:04:39PM +0100, Florent Thoumie wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Andrew Pantyukhin
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 02:42:24PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > > That's well hidden (DOC/lzam.txt in the
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 08:57:08AM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 02:34:39PM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 02:42:24PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > > That's well hidden (DOC/lzam.txt in the tarball). Someone
> >
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:21:45AM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> вівторок 22 квітень 2008 06:34 до, Andrew Pantyukhin Ви написали:
> > So I guess we'll have to stick to using lzma from ports for now.
>
> Well, we lived with bzip2 from ports for quite a while...
>
>
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 07:33:35PM +0200, Hans Lambermont wrote:
> This might be interesting to multiple ports:
>
> 7.0-R, fresh portsnap.
>
> # portmaster -bad
> ...
> ===>>> Gathering dependency list for graphics/ImageMagick from ports
> ===>>> Starting dependency check
>
> ===>>> The dependen
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 06:47:16PM +0200, Thierry Thomas wrote:
> On Fri 2 may 08 at 17:39:08 +0200, Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > I am the maintainer of the science/vis5d+ port. It was recently marked
> > broken, and I submitted the PR ports/123233 to fix it. Ho
I wonder if anyone succeeded in getting subj working. The
simplest way to test it is:
- install a plane one font (e.g. I've just committed code2001)
- verify it's working in firefox (after a restart)
- add something like 'xft:Code2001:size=19,xft:' to
'URxvt*font:' in .Xresources, and merge i
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 03:44:59PM +0200, Thierry Thomas wrote:
> Le Sam 10 mai 08 à 9:07:40 +0200, Andrew Pantyukhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> écrivait :
> > I wonder if anyone succeeded in getting subj working.
Thanks to Denis Barov, I traced the problem down to screen(1).
Sin
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 10:23:51PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
> Can you tell me why this portupgrade fails?
>
> creating seeking_example
> Making all in vq
> ---> Backing up the old version
> tar: +COMMENT: Cannot stat: No such file or directory
> tar: +DESC: Cannot stat: No such file or director
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 07:46:05AM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
>
> On May 28, 2008, at 6:10 AM, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 10:23:51PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
>>> Can you tell me why this portupgrade fails?
>>>
>>> cre
On 3/25/07, KillFill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Marcin!
actually the BSD# ports repo, already got gnome-subtitles!
"already" as in "2 hours after Marcin's mail"?
It happens all the time - two people working on the
same thing independently. I'm sure you both did a
great job porting gnom
On 3/29/07, David Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I recently made and installed TWiki 4.1.0, and have run into some issues. When
I
check the TWiki project site:
http://twiki.org/cgi-bin/view/Codev/DownloadTWiki
they have released a newer version. Should I downl
On 3/30/07, David Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andrew:
Thank you for your reply.
> Be sure to backup your data before every update if you use twiki from
> ports. It (the port) doesn't support updates, only the first time
> install. Personally, I maintain my twiki installation manually
Dear xpi-extensions maintainers,
Some of you granted me an implicit approval for
routine updates of your xpi ports. That was some
time ago and now I ask you to renew the approval.
If you want to, just reply to this mail (you
don't need to include all the recipients, of
course) to tell me it's oka
On 4/2/07, Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK. I have to know ... who took all the time to write that all
up?
Look into the headers and grep our mailing-list archives
for peculiar ones, like "bofh" ;-)
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
On 4/4/07, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
===
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
In file included from
/usr/local/include/libgnome-2.0/libgnome/gnome-program.h:41,
from /usr/local/include/libgnome-2.0/libgn
On 4/9/07, Beech Rintoul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a port which calls php -m as a test from the makefile. Problem
is if I do php -m I get the following:
stargate# php -m
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/php/20060613/imap.so: Undefined
symbol "ssl_onceonlyinit"
I tried rebuilding php
On 4/9/07, Alagarsamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I had package A and package B. Package A does all the functions of
Package B and some more functions. So installing package A should
replace package B. So i need to have a 'REPLACES' like directive in
Makefile of Package A which says "package A
On 4/20/07, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"/a/portbuild/amd64/7/ports/deskutils/linux-sunbird/
../../www/linux-seamonkey/Makefile.common", line 43:
warning: duplicate script for target "post-extract" ignored
Fixed, sorry.
Thanks for a heads-up!
__
First of all, thanks for taking up the initiative and
updating Kwiki. It's a worthy project.
Do we want to bundle Kwiki into a single port? In ports
we usually consider bundling (of any software project)
a harmful thing, as opposed to modularizing. I haven't
looked at those new Kwiki snapshots, b
On 4/23/07, Cheng-Lung Sung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Quote from http://search.cpan.org/src/INGY/Kwiki-0.39/README
"Kwiki is *really* simple to install now. _All_ the Perl dependencies
come with Kwiki, and are /preinstalled/. This means you just need Perl
5.8.3 and a web server. Well
On 5/2/07, Jesse Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why is www/linux-firefox version 2.0.0.3 built using JavaScript version
1.4? Check the link below to see the JavaScript version you are using:
http://tychousa3.umuc.edu/sys/browserinfo.html
linux-firefox uses the official binary from mozilla.com
On 5/2/07, Dan Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I can see this was removed a long time ago, but I do not see that need
to remove the option entirely.
Would it be much of a pain to ask someone to add it as an option. I
have attached a diff for the Make file.
10c10
< PORTREVISION= 2
---
> PORT
On 5/2/07, Dan Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm guilty of not reading the handbook.. I just assumed that revision
had to be bumped up. Or perhaps the reason for bumping it up is to
prevent systems from recompiling the port for no reason.
Anyway, I have attached the fixed unified diff.
Com
On 3/30/07, Andrew Pantyukhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear xpi-extensions maintainers,
Some of you granted me an implicit approval for
routine updates of your xpi ports. That was some
time ago and now I ask you to renew the approval.
If you want to, just reply to this mail (you
don
On 5/11/07, Edwin Groothuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 05:28:17PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Dear porters,
>
> We are now ready for xorg 7.2 testing! Over the past week we have
> done extensive tests of various upgrade scenarios, fixed many
> remaining bugs, and now th
On 5/11/07, Edwin Groothuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 08:28:57PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > >http://people.FreeBSD.org/~ade/ports-xorg-7.2-nogit.tar.bz2 is only 28Mb
> >
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~sat/diffs/ports.xorg72.diff.bz2 is only 461 Kb
> >
> > In fact, th
On 5/12/07, Andy Kosela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to present to you the new utility to deal with the ports
system. The main goal of this project is to provide one common tool
for managing ports and packages instead of relying on many
applications (pkg_add, pkg_delete, pkg_i
Reporting success on one of my desktops. It's a current/i386
box with a little over 1000 packages (after the upgrade).
I used portupgrade-devel, but started with stale INDEX. For
this reason or not, I stumbled upon the libXft quirk. Stopped
the upgrade when I saw a few pkg_create's to take far to
On 5/13/07, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 01:00:51AM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> Reporting success on one of my desktops. It's a current/i386
> box with a little over 1000 packages (after the upgrade).
>
> I used portupgrade-devel,
On 5/13/07, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 01:11:15AM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> On 5/13/07, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 01:00:51AM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> >> mergebase.
On 5/20/07, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That rates as the biggest commit I recall seeing:
> - Affecting 7868 files
> - Updating 6168 ports
> - Creating 255 new ports
> - 700KB, 14553 line commit message
The commit message never showed
On 5/22/07, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 01:47:23AM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> This small modification cuts off about 25% off pkg_version on my system.
>
> Basically bsd.gnome.mk recursively finds all the dependencies, but many
> of them are liste
On 5/22/07, Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Quoting Andrew Pantyukhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Tue, 22 May
2007 11:55:39 +0400):
> On 5/22/07, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 01:47:23AM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-
On 5/22/07, Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> On 5/22/07, Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Quoting Andrew Pantyukhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Tue, 22 May
>> 2007 11:55:39 +0400):
>>
>>
On 5/22/07, Michael Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
multimedia/gstreamer80 has been marked DEPRECATED and has an
EXPIRATION_DATE of 2007-05-31.
The following ports depend on gstreamer80
...
Please update your ports to use gstreamer 0.10. We will probably
extend the removal since there are so
On 5/22/07, Michael Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On May 22, 2007, at 11:29 AM, Jona Joachim wrote:
> On Tue, 22 May 2007 19:18:57 +0400
> "Andrew Pantyukhin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On 5/22/07, Michael Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/22/07, Olivier Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
Some "freebsd-beginner" questions about how to maintain a production
server up to date day after day, with a practical example: now I have
to update a 6.1-based server from mysql 4.1 to mysql 5.0, minimizing
the downtime during the up
On 5/24/07, Mark Linimon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 05:34:32PM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> A seemingly better way may be to make these system vars
> available in make by default.
Doesn't help anyone who runs -RELEASE, so a non-starter.
You can
On 5/24/07, Thierry Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Le Jeu 24 mai 07 à 12:16:26 +0200, Gabor Tjong A Hung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
écrivait:
> What happens with discontinued projects?
> They seem to pollute our ports tree.
>
> http://tmsnc.sourceforge.net/ seems to indiacte that the project is
> di
On 6/6/07, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is anyone working on a compat6x port?
mnag is
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On 6/12/07, Mark Linimon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 10:55:42AM +0700, Dede NURMANSYAH wrote:
> Do you have a plan to port zabbix 1.4 into port current? Because many
> improvement since 1.1.x of zabbix release.
Since the port is unmaintained (just assigned to the mailing l
On 6/28/07, Greg Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 08:58:22PM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> The c.6 dependency does not work if you have linux
> base installed (thanks to /compat/linux/lib/libc.6)
>
> How about depending on z.3 instead?
How abou
On 7/6/07, Eric Kingston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There is a bug in LZMA running on amd64. LZMA, an archiver port,
segmentation faults on files > 1-5 GB in size. I've tested this on three
different xeon dual multi-core processor servers. In each case, lzma core
dumps in the exact same spot a
On 7/20/07, Jonathan Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 20 July 2007 08:36:38 Jonathan Horne wrote:
> > i am trying to setup mail/horde on a test box,
> > but so far i am not having much success. can
> > anyone direct me to a place where i might find
> > tips or documentation for setting
On 8/2/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Trying to install rsyslog from ports and getting the following error:
>
> net.h:72: warning: "struct sockaddr_storage" declared inside parameter list
> net.h:72: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which
> is probabl
On 8/4/07, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is nice work, but it seems to require the attached patch. Without
> it I get the following error messages:
>
> "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 1092: Could not find /Mk/bsd.commands.mk
> --- bsd.port.mk 4 Aug 2007 11:37:23 - 1.578
On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 10:57:50AM +1000, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 06:40:23PM +0200, Erwin Lansing wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 10:30:51AM +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 11:33:42PM +, Mark Linimon wrote:
> > > > The main feature of
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 06:58:34PM +0200, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> Dmitry Marakasov píše v po 10. 09. 2007 v 19:26 +0400:
> > * Pav Lucistnik ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
> > > > > It's possible to use this feature, but only on -CURRENT and -STABLE
> > > > > FreeBSD systems newer than certain date
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 12:04:29PM +0400, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
> Thomas-Martin Seck wrote:
>> * RW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [gmane.os.freebsd.devel.ports]:
>>> The squid site is recommending that people skip 2.6.15 and go straight
>>> to 2.6.16
>> The Squid maintainer can not resist to recommend tha
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 09:12:26AM +1000, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 01:50:39AM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 10:57:50AM +1000, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> > > On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 06:40:23PM +0200, Erwin Lansing wrote:
>
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 01:18:31PM +0100, Shaun Amott wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 02:00:14AM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> >
> > So am I missing something or is it as trivial as using these four
> > lines instead of one:
> >
> > USEOPTIONSMK=
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 02:01:22PM +0200, Gergely Sánta wrote:
> Hi!
> I'm a developer using gvim with it's tagging through exctags (somehow ctags
> never worked for me). As vim port have no configuration options, it can't
> be configured easyly through 'make config'. I'm too lazy for digging
>
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 10:29:05AM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> Any particular reason for no vim scripts in ports?
> I'm gonna make some, if there's no secret taboo.
Better late than never :-) For the past two days I've been
playing with some vim scripts. Here
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 07:07:46PM -0700, David E. O'Brien wrote:
> Brownie ports for someone that can explain why this always happens for me
> with ports that have OPTIONS:
>
> bash$ make
> cd /usr/ports/editors/vim && make config;
> ===> Switching to root credentials to create /var/
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 11:03:04PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I just have an idea that may be useful: static port builds. This can
> help produce packages without any depends, which may be useful
> sometimes.
What I'd like to see first is some quantitative research on the
benefits o
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 09:20:24PM +0300, Diomidis Spinellis wrote:
> Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 11:03:04PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> I just have an idea that may be useful: static port builds. This can
>>&
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 09:54:36AM -0400, Chess Griffin wrote:
> Hello-
> I am working on some small cleanup patches to a couple port Makefiles
> and had a few questions on how to handle man/info pages.
>
> I have come across a couple Makefiles that have something like this in
> post-install:
>
IMHO trailing slashes are very good style:
1. It's easier to see that destination is a directory
2. In case the destination directory does not exist
a trailing slash will save you from a nasty bug
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.
On 8/12/06, Roman Lazio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello, I submitted audio/libdssialsacompat about a month ago and
nobody seems to have looked at it yet.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/100498
I take reponsibility for maintainership, for now. It is quite an
important port as o
On 8/15/06, Dmitry Marakasov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* I don't think DESTDIR compatibility can be tested automatically, so
this would make freebsd user's life easier (user will be sure that after he
installs ports into [jail|other freebsd installation mounted via
nfs|locally] being set c
So now that Dmitry sounded a sober thought, I'll give a one
of my own.
I would rather see PREFIX respect DESTDIR and go through
all the pains of respecting PREFIX. This way we reach a
double cause:
* ensure PREFIX is respected (this will reveal thousands of
erring ports, but it will be worth it)
I'd like to propose a policy to enforce a change in
DIST_SUBDIR whenever a distfile is rerolled in-place, i.e.
when checksum changes, but name stays unchanged.
Moreover, effort should be made whenever possible to
make the old file available for download from an
alternative location.
This policy
When/if we get a new VCS, where branching is not as painful
as it is now, I expect it to be used extensively by developers.
Projects can be then brought back into our main repo from
marcuscom, p4 and other local repos. We often work on some
things together and/or from multiple locations. It feels
On 8/16/06, Andrew Pantyukhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to propose a policy to enforce a change in
DIST_SUBDIR whenever a distfile is rerolled in-place, i.e.
when checksum changes, but name stays unchanged.
Moreover, effort should be made whenever possible to
make t
On 8/20/06, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> On 8/16/06, Andrew Pantyukhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'd like to propose a policy to enforce a change in
>> DIST_SUBDIR whenever a distfile is rerolled in-place, i.e.
>>
On 8/20/06, Andrew Pantyukhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/20/06, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OTOH, your solution would break the logic that portmaster (and I believe
> portupgrade also) uses to detect and delete stale distfiles.
AFAICT portmaster's logi
On 8/19/06, Roman Bogorodskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> I'd like to propose a policy to enforce a change in
> DIST_SUBDIR whenever a distfile is rerolled in-place, i.e.
> when checksum changes, but name stays unchanged.
>
> Moreover, effo
On 8/21/06, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm combining both of your responses to save time.
Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> On 8/20/06, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
>> > On 8/16/06, Andrew Pantyukhin <[EMAIL PROTEC
I can't help thinking that the way we're trying to deal with
locale directories is far from optimal. IMHO, there are
several ways to improve the state of things:
1. Add more locales
We can add all those locales found in the same mtree
file under nls, and all less specific locales. I.e. if
aa_BB.C
On 8/24/06, Jeremy Messenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 08:26:53 -0500, Andrew Pantyukhin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't help thinking that the way we're trying to deal with
> locale directories is far from optimal. IMHO, there are
> se
On 8/24/06, Stanislav Sedov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:50:52 +0400
"Andrew Pantyukhin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
> On 8/24/06, Jeremy Messenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 08:26:53 -0500, Andrew Pan
On 8/25/06, Jeremy Messenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 09:50:52 -0500, Andrew Pantyukhin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/24/06, Jeremy Messenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 08:26:53 -0500, Andrew Pantyukhin
>> <
On 8/24/06, Stanislav Sedov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:09:33 +0400
"Andrew Pantyukhin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
> Again, you don't really mean it. Try installing any p5 port into
> a non-localbase prefix, and you'll see that
On 8/24/06, Stanislav Sedov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 10:19:40 -0700
othermark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
> I have a port that I'm working on that, in addition to the binaries it
> generates, it generates the following:
>
> - C api, includes, libraries
> - perl api
> - t
On 8/25/06, Ion-Mihai IOnut Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:08:25 -0600
Jason Boisvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi FreeBSD professionals,
>
>
> Pls note that I received this error msg when trying to run portsdb
> -Uu on my gateway 450 laptop.
>
>
>
> =
A new hunspell port is available here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~sat/abc/hunspell-114.tbz
The plan is to ask for a repomove from hungarian/
Would you like to maintain it?
Thanks!
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mail
Under no circumstances should a port install world-writable
files or directories. In most cases this opens the system to all
kinds of attacks. A simple grep brings the following list of
makefiles to attention. I imagine that samba ports are
somehow justified, as for the other ones, I hope secteam
On 8/31/06, Alex Dupre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andrew Pantyukhin ha scritto:
> Under no circumstances should a port install world-writable
> files or directories.
> www/eaccelerator/Makefile
Where? I suspect you grep'ed 777 inside Makefiles, but in eaccelerator
there is
On 9/1/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 10:19:24AM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 06:15:18PM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> > Under no circumstances should a port install world-writable
> > files or directorie
On 9/1/06, Andrew Pantyukhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/1/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 10:19:24AM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 06:15:18PM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> > > Under no circu
On 9/4/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 08:48:26PM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> On 9/1/06, Andrew Pantyukhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On 9/1/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Thu, Aug 31, 200
1 - 100 of 162 matches
Mail list logo
