stalled on a system. Probably, it's a
good idea to examine how they do that slotting.
Sincerely,
Alexander Churanov
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
;m just trying to find the simplest way to resolve this issue.
Alexander Churanov
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
2009/1/11 Pav Lucistnik
> Alexander Churanov píše v ne 11. 01. 2009 v 21:38 +0300:
>
> > I'll carry out this experiment.
>
> Let's see if there's an easy way to make all the ports respect it, say,
> if it would mean just modifying pkg-config output. If it&#x
ly me got this trouble, any suggestions?
/Alexander Konovalenko
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
using this hang on _umtx_op?
Anyway, seem that on my second machine I have to force update all
dependencies...
Thanks for your help guys!
/Alexander Konovalenko
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Tuesday 03 February 2009, Daniel Roethlisberger wrote:
> Garrett Cooper 2009-02-02:
> > On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Daniel Roethlisberger
wrote:
> > > Alexander Konovalenko 2009-02-01:
> > >> > From: Daniel Roethlisberger
> > >> >...
>
ing a keyword).
pkgconfig could be extracted from the USE_GNOME stuff, and it could
even maintained by someone else than the FreeBSD gnome team, but the
FreeBSD gnome team is doing a good job at maintaining it, and there's
no benefit in extracting pkgconfig from USE_GNOME.
HTH,
Alexander.
Hello:
I have a 7.1-RELEASE box (under a VM) with the boost-1.38_beta2
building happily using the current port infrastructure, i.e. the
current port of boost completely builds out of the box with the only
some minor changes and some added options to the port Makefile (adding
EXPAT, perhaps making
eases.
Sincerely,
Alexander Churanov
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
it's possible at present.
My plan is to examine how much work is necessary to fix all ports, this
looks like a better way for now.
Alexander Churanov
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
used a.out instead of ELF are not
supported anymore since a very very long time. We still are able to
load a.out stuff in the current releases, but the entire compiler
toolchain is using ELF by default. You have to make some effort to
generate a.out stuff.
Bye,
Alexander.
--
Bender: &q
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
> I've seen couple of conversations in this list about updating devel/boost to
> the
> recent version. As I understand people already have patches but the main
> issue is
> getting all ports depending on boost to work with the new version, an
Hi guys!
I am Alexander Churanov, currently maintaining devel/boost (for
several weeks :-).
Yes, leaving 1.34 would be awful and nobody is going to do that!
For current status, current efforts and decisions see
http://wiki.freebsd.org/BoostPortingProject.
My comments on the suggested solution
idea...
>
> It seems we have some very good examples like openldap ports.
Thank you for example, I am examining it.
Alexander Churanov
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
2009/3/12 Andriy Gapon :
> on 12/03/2009 03:26 Alexander Churanov said the following:
>> The issue is devel/boost and devel/boost138 will not coexist. Is it OK
>> in your opinion?
>
> I am not sure why... It is trivial to make different (non-default) boost
> versions to i
This is not quite correct statement. ATM all required packages are
present in the ports tree.
./run script fetched from the trunk may need a quick lobotomy course
though.
When I checked it out last time whole thing just works (well it still
works :-)
On 13.03.2009, at 12:31, 葉佳威 Jiawei Ye
atus of porting is recorded at
http://wiki.freebsd.org/BoostPortingProject.
Alexander Churanov,
maintainer of devel/boost
P.S. Regarding the subject of the message: I hardly recognized that
it's relevant to me. Plain text "boost" or (and better) "devel/boost"
increases ch
on my dev box (as opposed
> to tinderbox).
Now nothing. I saw the wiki page is updated frequently with "fixed"
comments or PR numbers. Thank you and all guys who are working on it.
I've never had sufficient time to fix all dependent ports if
Hi folks!
As stated on http://wiki.freebsd.org/BoostPortingProject, all issues
with ports depending on devel/boost are resolved.
Should I do something for updating the port?
Sincerely,
Alexander Churanov,
maintainer of devel/boost
___
freebsd-ports
vdccm failed
Sorry, this is my fault. Please add WANT_GNOME=yes to
palm/synce-vdccm/Makefile. Thanks!
--
WBR,
Alexander mailto:free...@akavia.ru
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listin
d
several times.
2) The number of ports is increased.
The questions are:
1) Should we break boost into parts?
2) Should we break boost into "jam', 'source-libs', 'shared-libs',
'python-libs' and 'docs' or into one port per library?
If folks agr
well, because it's a build tool
I agree.
So then the list of options is as follows:
1) "jam", "source-libs", "compiled-libs" (or "shared-libs"),
"python-libs" and "docs"
2) "jam", "libs", "python-
7.2-RELEASE?
2) Is is permitted to test patch for updating to 1.38 with some ports,
not with all that depend on boost and then file a PR, specifying which
ports were tested? The aim is to omit building and testing some ports
(like openoffice) myself.
Sincer
g it.
As I understand this, it's OK to file a PR for just updating to 1.38,
but port re-organization is delayed until 7.2 is released. Is this
correct?
Sincerely,
Alexander Churanov,
maintainer of devel/boost
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
pper() where
> toupper(3) reveals that it only takes one argument.
This is has nothing in common with libc and toupper(3). This is a
method of class "_ctype_abstract_base" used to implement C++ locale
facet.
Alexander Churanov
___
freebsd-ports
Kevin,
I'm looking into that.
Alexander Churanov
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:19:30 +0400 (MSD), Dmitry Morozovsky
wrote:
> JMC> Actually, I have always shied away from such things. We regularly
get
> JMC> requests to change the meta-port, but we long ago took the
philosophy to
> JMC> keep the Desktop meta-port as close to the official set of GNOME
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 10:22:41 +0400 (MSD), Dmitry Morozovsky
wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Apr 2009, Alexander Nedotsukov wrote:
>
> AN> > Well, then I suppose we should at least say something about this in
release
> AN> > notes, because in 7.2 one of *major* desktop application s
2009/4/24 Kevin Oberman :
> I note that deluge now requires gcc-4.3 which is new since I built
> deluge last time. It works fine with the new build.
>
> Please feel free to close the ticket.
>
> Thanks for taking the time to look at this!
> --
> R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
> Energy Sciences
This file contains any messages produced by compilers while
running configure, to aid debugging if configure makes a mistake.
It was created by GNU Automake configure 1.10.1, which was
generated by GNU Autoconf 2.61. Invocation command line was
$ ./configure --program-suffix=-1.10 --prefix=/u
nd upon).
Bye,
Alexander.
--
Save a tree -- kill an ISO working group today.
-- Jason Zions
http://www.Leidinger.netAlexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7
http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137
2009/5/4 Alexey V. Degtyarev :
> I think that pkg_upgrade should respect a new package's dependency list
> and pre-fetch all the new dependencies before pkg_add.
My $0.02:
And calculate their size, and (in interactive mode) provide and option
for a user to cancel download :-)
d.org/BoostPortingProject.
Alexander Churanov
P.S. Sorry for the late response, 1st to 3rd of May were holidays in my country.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any ma
am teaching people C, C++ and UNIX API using FreeBSD at university.
There is a need for memory-checking tool. Does anybody know any
alternatives for FreeBSD 7?
Alexander Churanov
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
ot work.
Sounds a little bit harsh... I would say "It may or may not work. If it
doesn't work don't complain here." as this will work if it is done
right. But doing it right (handling the dependencies and the ports
infrastructure bits) requires time/man power/following the commits.
ew defines
> which not works as expected.
>
> I am not expert in dlopen() at all. Please look someone who knows.
>
You do not have to be an expert in dlopen to find out the list of
loaded modules at the time dlopen called, what parameters dlopen is
called with and where the symb
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 16:57:35 +0400
Andrey Chernov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 08:23:46AM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> > > Syntax error on line 213 of /usr/local/etc/apache/httpd.conf:
> > > Cannot load /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_env.so int
int a document,
I get the error message "/usr/bin/lpr not found".
Try without the path...
I don't use a hack to let it print... AFAIR. I have a look at it later
and report back how I do it. It may take a while as I moved my desktop
into a jail and didn't changed my printing
Quoting Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Wed, 11 Apr 2007 13:33:00 +0200
(CEST)):
>
> Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > > I've configured Adobe Reader to use "/usr/bin/lpr -Plaser"
> > > for printing ("laser&quo
x/usr/bin/lpr. So we're in
the same situation like with Acroread. So when you play around with it
also try to not specify a path to the lpr call and tell us which one
works.
Bye,
Alexander.
--
BOFH excuse #227:
Fatal error right in front of screen
http://www.Leidinger.net
path in acroread and somehow it
didn't work for him).
Bye,
Alexander.
--
Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent.
-- Wittgenstein
http://www.Leidinger.netAlexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7
http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBS
Quoting Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Thu, 12 Apr 2007
14:29:09 +0200 (CEST)):
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> I think you said the same than I did, just differently (Oliver did
> call lpr with the full (correct?) path in acroread and somehow it
> didn't wo
com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/arch/2006-05/msg00109.html
Bye,
Alexander.
--
There is a natural hootchy-kootchy to a goldfish.
-- Walt Disney
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7
http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID
mpatible).
The only thing what needs to be ported is the kernel interface.
Have a look at http://www.leidinger.net/FreeBSD/ATI/ for some
preliminary results. Note, I'm not the author, I just host the files.
The author doesn't work at this ATM, so anyone is free to pick it up
an
Thomas Zander wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to track down a problem with building mplayer with debug
symbols. The problem is that this seems possible (at least on my
machine) only if it is compiled with
-O{1|2|3} -fomit-frame-pointer
due to one of its incredibly smart inline-asm sections.
Now, when u
This leads me to the question if it is like a normal ports freeze: Can
we (committers) submit patches (important ones like security/failure
fixes) to portmgr and ask for commit approval, or is this some kind of
very hard lockdown of the tree?
Bye,
Alexander.
--
"Your son still
oof of concept because no error
checking, and things like that).
As you want to use the origin (it seems), grep for DEPORIGIN instead
of pkgdep, should be even more fast than what you already have.
Bye,
Alexander.
--
This was the most unkindest cut of all.
-- William Shakespeare, &
Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Mon, 14 May 2007 10:37:05
-0500):
> Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from
> > Mon, 14 May 2007 09:39:13 -0500):
> >
> >> Someone pointed out tha
and a make call (IIR your
patch correctly).
Bye,
Alexander.
--
Innovation is hard to schedule.
-- Dan Fylstra
http://www.Leidinger.netAlexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7
http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PG
rything.
The problem not discussed so far is: some ports may not have all first
order dependencies. So anyone wanting to change this should install a
tinderbox and start testing fixing those ports.
Bye,
Alexander.
--
On the whole, I'd rather be in Philadelphia.
Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Wed, 16 May 2007 07:59:11
-0500):
> Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Tue,
> > 15 May 2007 16:53:35 -0500):
> >
> >> Ulrich Spoerlein w
ble change in how
> package dependencies are pulled in.
Yes and no. It is not only about the package dependency, but also about
a "portupgrade -f" or "bumping all ports which depend directly upon lib
X".
Bye,
Alexander.
--
Be cautious in your daily affairs.
http://www.Leidi
noland-ibm% make actual-package-depends|wc -l
> 294
>
> Registered the old way:
> rnoland-ibm% grep @pkgdep /var/db/pkg/gnome2-2.18.1_1/+CONTENTS|wc -l
> 176
>
> and the new way:
> rnoland-ibm% grep @pkgdep /var/db/pkg/gnome2-2.18.1_1/+CONTENTS|wc -l
> 29
Quoting Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Thu, 17 May 2007 11:44:36
+0200):
> For the difference between the redirected output case: I think the
> gnome terminal needs a lot of time to print all the lines. But still,
> the awk version takes around 3/4 of the time (interest
Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Thu, 17 May 2007 08:14:43
-0500):
> Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > Quoting Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Thu, 17 May 2007 11:44:36
> > +0200):
> >
> >> For the difference between the redi
endencies of the installed ports
like in actual-package-depends and then the remaining ones like it is
done currently...
Bye,
Alexander.
--
Music in the soul can be heard by the universe.
-- Lao Tsu
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7
http://ww
Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from
Thu, 17 May 2007 15:58:38 -0500):
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Wed,
16 May 2007 16:01:56 -0500):
If I get some positive feedback
Quoting Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Thu, 17
May 2007 17:52:57 +0200):
Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Thu,
17 May 2007 08:14:43 -0500):
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Quoting Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Thu, 17
Ma
ve to make sure no dependency is set in the second part of
bsd.port.mk then. I don't know for sure if this is already the case. I
expect that it is not the case.
Bye,
Alexander.
--
A stagnant science is at a standstill.
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B006
be used
with update tools if there's some interest in something like this from
the author of such a tool.
Bye,
Alexander.
--
The only way to make up for being lost is to make
record time while you are lost.
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7
Hi,
from the Makefile:
---snip---
PORTVERSION=${GS_VERSION}
PORTREVISION= 1
PORTREVISION= ${GS_REVISION}
---snip---
Bye,
Alexander.
--
Know what I hate most? Rhetorical questions.
-- Henry N. Camp
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7
Quoting Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Sun, 20 May 2007
15:20:48 -0700):
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Sat,
19 May 2007 23:48:52 -0500):
On my system, the program pkg_version can double its speed simply
by replac
Quoting Jeremy Lea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Sun, 20 May 2007 19:13:13 -0700):
Hi,
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 09:01:49AM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
I could write such a new target, e.g. limited-clean, which could be used
with update tools if there's some interest in somethin
y fast.
Unfortunately it's not an option here. We have to keep the current
semantic and take the usage scenarios into account, which are possible
currently. What you propose is not usable as a plugin-replacement for
the current "make clean" (and that's what we try to achieve).
endency from the
beginning.
Bye,
Alexander.
--
With reasonable men I will reason;
with humane men I will plead;
but to tyrants I will give no quarter.
-- William Lloyd Garrison
http://www.Leidinger.netAlexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7
http://www.FreeBSD.or
Error 1
> gmake[1]: Leaving directory
> `/usr/obj/homeKamikaze.norad/usr/ports/graphics/mesa-demos/work/Mesa-6.5.3/progs/xdemos'
> gmake: *** [default] Error 1
> *** Error code 2
>
> Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/mesa-demos.
>
I have "nvidia-driver-9631" installed
Quoting Jeremy Lea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Mon, 21 May 2007 15:28:16 -0700):
Hi,
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 10:20:26AM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
I tried to do the WRKDIR and _DEPEND_DIRS part in one go myself, but
it was slower than the patch I did post (in the case where all di
Quoting Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Mon, 21 May 2007
14:57:39 -0400):
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 11:49:32AM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting Paul Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Sun, 20 May 2007
16:28:56 -0500):
>It would be nice if every port that you us
GTK2_VERSION="${GTK2_VERSION}"
Be careful, != assignments may add thousands of process invocations to
large targets like 'make index' and can slow it down dramatically.
Right, and uniqueness logic can be implemented in make.
Be proactive and tell/point out how... :)
Bye,
vs commit to bsd.port.mk).
Bye,
Alexander.
--
It used to be the fun was in
The capture and kill.
In another place and time
I did it all for thrills.
-- Lust to Love
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7
http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.o
that for new installs this is not nice, but if you don't
need X11 at all, you can go ahead with this simple modification (and
benefit of not having to install x11 for your headless server).
Bye,
Alexander.
--
You may be recognized soon.
Hide!
If they find you, lie.
http://www
Correct me if I wrong. Don't you missed the fact that chdir(2) changes
process wide attribute?
Though it's easy to fix with -C option.
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 03:52:16PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
wrote:
I have been thinking a lot abo
and let it remove the old ports for those where more
than one exists
Collaborative solution:
- post the pkgname of each
- let people here send the +CONTENTS files to you
Bye,
Alexander.
--
Two can Live as Cheaply as One for Half as Long.
-- Howard Kandel
http://www.
accelerator by
hand when I update php, so I would not mind if the revision of
eaccelerator would be incremented on each version bump of php
(disclaimer, I didn't follow this discussion and stumbled upon this
specific mail only by accident).
Bye,
Alexander.
--
Cthulhu for President!
Hi,
does someone has a fix for the illegal instruction problem (gcc inserts
an illegal instruction instead of bailing out with an error on some
special kind of bad C code) with ghostscript gpl on current?
Bye,
Alexander.
--
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7
Quoting Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Thu, 7 Jun 2007 20:06:02
+0200):
> Hi,
>
> does someone has a fix for the illegal instruction problem (gcc inserts
> an illegal instruction instead of bailing out with an error on some
> special kind of bad C code) with ghost
ly annoying.
First there where no OPTIONS, then OPTIONS was introduced. If you feel
annoyed by those ports which are not converted yet to OPTIONS (because
nobody felt annoyed enough to convert them), feel free to submit
patches for them.
Bye,
Alexander.
--
A political man can have as
r this and some more bsd.port.mk
improvements for testing at:
http://www.Leidinger.net/FreeBSD/port-patches/
Bye,
Alexander.
--
"man hier" will explain the way FreeBSD filesystems are normally laid out.
-- David Scheidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.Leidinger
Quoting Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Sun, 17 Jun 2007 12:27:52 +0200):
> Alexander Leidinger píše v ne 17. 06. 2007 v 12:02 +0200:
>
> > somehow you didn't got the final patch.
>
> I went with the latest patch available in the PR.
Yeah... somehow we didn&
Quoting Garrett Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Sun, 17 Jun
2007 13:42:45 -0700):
Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Alexander Leidinger píše v ne 17. 06. 2007 v 18:41 +0200:
On a related note, have you got a PR for the "make clean"-speedup?
What PR number would that be?
I don'
Quoting Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Tue, 22
May 2007 09:26:58 +0200):
Quoting Jeremy Lea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Mon, 21 May 2007 15:28:16 -0700):
Hi,
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 10:20:26AM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
I tried to do the WRKDIR and _DEPEND_
for not saving power (so it makes
sense to run this on a mostly idle system to find the cause of wasting
power; some applications are already fixed to be more power friendly).
Bye,
Alexander.
--
When a man steals your wife, there is no better revenge than to let him
keep her
Quoting "Andrey V. Elsukov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Thu, 21 Jun 2007
15:55:03 +0400):
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
has someone tried to port the Intel powertop tool
(http://www.linuxpowertop.org/) to FreeBSD? If not, is someone
willing to have a look at it, or should
Hello!
It seems one of the MASTER_SITE_RUBYFORGE site is dead (for example
http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/portsurvey/www.html and all
rubygem-)
# host rubyforge.halostatue.info
Host rubyforge.halostatue.info not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
There is another mirror from http://rubyforge.org/credits/
27;
---snip---
Is it possible that the linux xorg libraries conflicts with the Xorg 7.2?
Not in the sense I think you want us to understand this sentence
(read: it is not a problem of the new version of Xorg, but it may be a
problem with picking up a FreeBSD library instead of a Linux librar
speed up for the current format, maybe the implementation is just a
little bit outdated compared to todays parsing knowledge...
Bye,
Alexander.
--
Life is a grand adventure -- or it is nothing.
-- Helen Keller
http://www.Leidinger.netAlexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID
Quoting Garrett Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Mon, 02 Jul
2007 08:10:14 -0700):
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
The problem is, that a change would break existing installations,
as they can not cope with such a new format. Feel free to propose
improvements, but you need to keep i
n) places. When you know
where it fails (and maybe why), you can report it on emulation@ and
Roman will try to fix the problem.
Interested souls can have a look at the archives of emulation
regarding the debug stuff (or ask on emulation@ if it is not easy to
find).
Bye,
Alexander.
--
Acid
n with other OPTIONS which changes the +CONTENTS
file? If I read your patch right, it will use the wrong contents...
Bye,
Alexander.
--
I wonder if I should put myself in ESCROW!!
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7
http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.
Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Wed, 18 Jul 2007 09:16:56
-0500):
> Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Tue, 17 Jul 2007
> > 19:46:11 -0500):
> >> It seems to me that the cure is t
Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Wed, 18 Jul 2007 10:11:47
-0500):
> Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Tue, 17 Jul 2007
> > 19:46:11 -0500):
> >
> >> I appreciate that most people
. This is only an
issue if you do this by hand instead of using portupgrade (or something
else), as those tools should correct the dependency in port b to the
new version of c. If they don't do it, it's a bug in those tools.
Bye,
Alexander.
--
h
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas-Martin Seck) (Fri, 20 Jul 2007 19:54:06 +0200
(CEST)):
> * Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [gmane.os.freebsd.devel.ports]:
>
> > Quoting Robert Noland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Thu, 19 Jul 2007 13:31:42 -0400):
> >
> &
You thought wrong.
Please read the PR again and try to understand what part it really does
cover and what doesn't. The comment was given to you before and it is
the right one:
atexit() cannot be used safely from the shared library.
That is the reason why __cxa_atexit was invented in the first place.
--
Alexander Kabaev
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
esponding release. This would be the cleanest solution, as all
linux ports are then build in the right environment and we don't have
to add magic code to every linux port (or bsd.port.mk).
Kris, your opinion?
Bye,
Alexander.
--
Howe's Law:
Everyone has a scheme that wil
appy to see in my own scripts but
never had the pressure to implement because they where not that
important for me. I also have to do less work by hand when using
portupgrade.
It may be not the best implementation for such a tool, but it's a huge
step forward compared to what we had
Quoting RW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Sun, 12 Aug 2007
18:18:10 +0100):
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 14:20:59 +0200
Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Quoting RW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Sat, 11 Aug 2007 22:58:58
+0100):
> On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 13:33:22 -0700
>
Quoting RW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Mon, 13 Aug 2007
12:38:37 +0100):
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 08:14:46 +0200
Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Quoting RW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Sun, 12 Aug 2007
18:18:10 +0100):
> On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 14:20:59 +0200
> Ale
Quoting RW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Tue, 14 Aug 2007 15:35:15 +0100):
>
> > >> > On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 14:20:59 +0200
> > >> > Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> Quoting RW <[EMAIL PROTEC
llection part. Remember,
we have to support even 6.x for a while. Introducing the FC6+ ports is
easy, but how to do it in a good way which works on all supported
releases...
Bye,
Alexander.
--
I love Mickey Mouse more than any woman I've ever known.
-- Walt Disney
htt
401 - 500 of 618 matches
Mail list logo
