On 08/04/21 07:27, Jim Trigg wrote:
I am going to submit that PORTSBASE should be something other than
/usr/local/. My current preference (though not solid) is /ports/. I
would like to reclaim /usr/local for true local (site-based, not
distribution-based) things. (Example: local [site-based] sc
On Thu, 8 Apr 2021, at 03:23, Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 9:49 AM Yasuhiro Kimura wrote:
> >
> > From: Ports Index build
> > Subject: INDEX build failed for 11.x
> > Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 00:05:39 GMT
> >
> > > INDEX build failed with errors:
> > > Generating INDEX-11 - please wait
On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 3:56 PM Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
> Evidently I didn't even think of checking for dependencies of CouchDB - as a
> network service there shouldn't be *any* runtime depencies on CouchDB if you
> just install a client.. I'll make sure to do this in future for ports
> removals
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
FreeBSD 11.4-RELEASE-p9
poudriere 3.3.99.20210303_1
I have both a "default" and a "local" ports tree that I use with
poudriere. I wanted to remove the "local" tree and recreate it using
git.
To remove it, I used:
poudriere ports -p local -d
I then attempted t recreate it for use by git:
poudrier
Hi!
I've just tried to configure fingerprint authentication using
security/fprintd port (installed from package).
It seems that it does not work 'out of the box'.
To get it working I needed to fix the following points:
- in
/usr/local/share/polkit-1/actions/net.reactivated.fprint.device.pol
Building devel/llvm10 via poudriere-devel on a Cortex-A57
system (OverDrive 1000), I ended up with just:
# /usr/local/llvm10/bin/llc -version
LLVM (http://llvm.org/):
LLVM version 10.0.1
Optimized build.
Default target: aarch64-portbld-freebsd14.0
Host CPU: (unknown)
Registered Targets:
## LuMiWa via freebsd-ports (freebsd-ports@freebsd.org):
> I didn't install because it pull Python 2.7. I didn't change any
> configuration.
The question is not so much what you did not do, but what you did
do. How did you try to install FreeCAD?
Regards,
Christoph
--
Spare Space
_
Hi I have a couple of pr's that were committed
but not merged to Quarterly. As a result pkg-fallout@
continues to complain.
Can someone please merge these to 2 FIXED prs to Quarterly?
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252257
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252258
On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 20:09:12 +0200
Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
> ## LuMiWa via freebsd-ports (freebsd-ports@freebsd.org):
>
> > I didn't install because it pull Python 2.7. I didn't change any
> > configuration.
>
> The question is not so much what you did not do, but what you did
> do. How
LuMiWa via freebsd-ports wrote on 2021/04/07 06:46:
> I didn't install because it pull Python 2.7. I didn't change any
> configuration. FreeCAD has just collada but other I left default. QT
> Web engine pulls Gstreamer and I thing something from Gstreamer pulls
> Python 2.7.
make -C /usr/ports/www
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 07:17:18 +0900
Tatsuki Makino wrote:
> LuMiWa via freebsd-ports wrote on 2021/04/07 06:46:
> > I didn't install because it pull Python 2.7. I didn't change any
> > configuration. FreeCAD has just collada but other I left default. QT
> > Web engine pulls Gstreamer and I thing so
Update:
From beefy6.nyi.freebsd.org I can now see the poudriere build status.
This shows the last build as being c3c627b06563 (with status stopped:
crashed:). My issue now is: is it possible to relate this build number
to a specific git revision? Or am I looking in the wrong place? I want
to find
> [/share/freebsd_ports] # git pull c3c627b06563
> fatal: 'c3c627b06563' does not appear to be a git repository
> fatal: Could not read from remote repository.
First, check the commit.
% git log| grep c3c627b06563
commit c3c627b06563cd0c7bcc4f491cd9c6f50716033b
Then checkout it.
% git checkout c3
Thank you. I had to delete and recreate the repro as non-shallow to get
the commit history but once done then I could find the commit and update
to it.
Follow-up:
I'm still not clear though whether checking out this commit brings in
all the commits from git clone to this one or only this commit.
On 4/04/2021 12:30 pm, Simon Wright wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been following the discussion about the git upgrade to the ports
> repro but am not clear about how it impacts my use case.
>
> At the moment I track ports on the revision that the Freebsd build
> cluster uses to build the "latest" pac
Thanks for this Dewayne. I have worked out the outlines of how the new
process works, it's the specifics of how it will impact my personal
process that I'm not clear about :).
With Masachika's help I now know how to link the build number as
reported by Poudriere to the git commit. That is trivial
Recent CURRENT host (FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT #26 main-n245806-4d221f59b85: Sat Apr
3
06:43:44 CEST 2021 amd64), poudriere CURRENT jail at 14.0-CURRENT 147 amd64
from
2021-04-08 05:25:38. It seems that the recent CURRENT does have a serious
problem when
building net/openldap24-server. The build
Simon Wright simon.wright at gmx.net wrote on
Fri Apr 9 02:48:47 UTC 2021 :
> I'm still not clear though whether checking out this commit brings in
> all the commits from git clone to this one or only this commit. My
> reading seems to say that this is *only* this one commit which is not my
> need
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 06:17:03 +0200
"Hartmann, O." wrote:
> Recent CURRENT host (FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT #26 main-n245806-4d221f59b85: Sat
> Apr 3 06:43:44 CEST 2021 amd64), poudriere CURRENT jail at 14.0-CURRENT
> 147 amd64 from 2021-04-08 05:25:38. It seems that the recent CURRENT does
> have a
20 matches
Mail list logo
