Re: Updating devel/tbb - Introducing devel/onetbb

2021-01-09 Thread Shane Ambler
On 8/1/21 9:51 pm, Ganael Laplanche wrote: > - leave devel/tbb in place and introduce a new port: devel/onetbb While I would generally support moving the old libs to a new portname, the fact that the project has renamed itself makes this acceptable. > - design devel/onetbb to install files in de

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2021-01-09 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you

Re: Updating devel/tbb - Introducing devel/onetbb

2021-01-09 Thread Ganael Laplanche
On Saturday, January 9, 2021 9:49:24 AM CET Shane Ambler wrote: Hello Shane, Thanks for your reply. > > - leave devel/tbb in place and introduce a new port: devel/onetbb > > While I would generally support moving the old libs to a new portname, > the fact that the project has renamed itself mak

can't build poudriere i386 arch: net/gitup

2021-01-09 Thread Nuno Teixeira
Hello, I'm trying to test a port in a different arch: doas poudriere bulk -j 114i386 -p ports net/gitup awk: can't open file /usr/local/poudriere/jails/114i386/usr/include/sys/param.h Could anyone please try latest gitup commit for me? https://github.com/johnmehr/gitup/issues/30

please update devel/android-tools-adb to 30.0.x

2021-01-09 Thread Masachika ISHIZUKA
I've updated my nexus5 to crDroid 7.2 (android 11). After that, I couldn't connect via adb. Please update devel/android-tools-adb to 30.0.x. P.S. I can connect via adb 30.0.5 on ubuntu. -- Masachika ISHIZUKA ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list htt

Re: Updating devel/tbb - Introducing devel/onetbb

2021-01-09 Thread Shane Ambler
On 10/1/21 4:29 am, Ganael Laplanche wrote: > 1) Move devel/tbb to a dedicated subdir and install devel/onetbb to its > default location. Here, we just anticipate what is written above. As you say, > as having devel/onetbb-only is the target, that would be the best solution > *BUT* it has the m