On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 08:39:41PM +0200, Leander Schaefer wrote:
> Hello Chris,
>
> Hello List,
>
> I have checked out ports-mgmt/synth unfortunately it would be a massive
> downgrade compared to poudriere. Does anyone have the right clue about how
> the FreeBSD package managment team provides a
Hi,
I am preparing new mail/courier port. There is an issue with conflicts,
current port version is 0.65.3 and new one will be 1.0.13 (or higher,
if upstream release comes sooner).
Currently I found following lines in Makefiles for relevant ports:
mail/courier-imap
CONFLICTS= courier-[0-9]*
Leander Schaefer info at NetOcean.de wrote on
Tue May 5 20:38:49 UTC 2020 :
> I have been dealing with Poudriere for quite a while and one of the most
> issues I have is, that I have ports which won't compile along with
> another. Reason is mostly something like:
>
> pkg-static: ImageMagick7-7.
Hi all,
I’m confused by this thread. isn’t the point of Poudriere
bulk builds to
- start with a clean jail
- build the first port in the list and all dependencies
- store the packages for later incorporation into the pkg repo
- clean out the jail completely
- start with the next port in the list
On 2020-May-11, at 11:34, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
> I’m confused by this thread. isn’t the point of Poudriere
> bulk builds to
When I listed:
# poudriere jail -l
JAILNAME VERSION ARCH METHOD TIMESTAMP PATH
FBSDFSSDjail 13.0-CURRENT amd64 nu
