Hi All!
I think that for the ports menu options need a new "default" button
(make rmconfig).
--
-
Alex.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-po
Hi
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245346
It would be nice to get some feedback and maybe a commiter
for this port.
Thanks
satanist
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To
Hi!
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245346
>
> It would be nice to get some feedback and maybe a commiter
> for this port.
Committed, thanks!
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ?
___
freebsd-po
Hi!
I hate to bug people about this sort of thing, as I know there is
always a big queue.
I submitted this PR a few weeks ago. It's simply a documentation
package so shouldn't take long.
It's a dependency for two other ports that I am waiting to submit (see
the PR). I don't really want to submit
Beware anyone building lang/ghc-8.8.3 from the ports tree. Building it
here on FreeBSD 12.1-REL AMD64 with Poudriere, the build ran out of swap,
despite the PC having 8 GB RAM, 8 GB swap and not much else running.
My /usr/local/etc/poudriere.conf:
BASEFS=/poudriere
ZPOOL=zroot
FREEBSD_HOST=http:/
## andrew clarke (m...@ozzmosis.com):
> Beware anyone building lang/ghc-8.8.3 from the ports tree. Building it
> here on FreeBSD 12.1-REL AMD64 with Poudriere, the build ran out of swap,
> despite the PC having 8 GB RAM, 8 GB swap and not much else running.
I believe they sell phones with that am
Hi!
> I hate to bug people about this sort of thing, as I know there is
> always a big queue.
>
> I submitted this PR a few weeks ago. It's simply a documentation
> package so shouldn't take long.
Done.
> It's a dependency for two other ports that I am waiting to submit (see
> the PR). I don't
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 1:37 PM andrew clarke wrote:
> Beware anyone building lang/ghc-8.8.3 from the ports tree. Building it
> here on FreeBSD 12.1-REL AMD64 with Poudriere, the build ran out of swap,
> despite the PC having 8 GB RAM, 8 GB swap and not much else running.
>
> My /usr/local/etc/pou
On 2020-05-05 14:19:50, Gleb Popov (arr...@freebsd.org) wrote:
> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 1:37 PM andrew clarke wrote:
>
> > Beware anyone building lang/ghc-8.8.3 from the ports tree. Building it
> > here on FreeBSD 12.1-REL AMD64 with Poudriere, the build ran out of swap,
> > despite the PC havin
On 5/05/2020 9:09 pm, andrew clarke wrote:
On 2020-05-05 14:19:50, Gleb Popov (arr...@freebsd.org) wrote:
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 1:37 PM andrew clarke wrote:
Beware anyone building lang/ghc-8.8.3 from the ports tree. Building it
here on FreeBSD 12.1-REL AMD64 with Poudriere, the build ran ou
## andrew clarke (m...@ozzmosis.com):
> But perhaps there's an option to limit make jobs just for a single port, set
> in
> /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/make.conf ? That would be nice.
echo "DISABLE_MAKE_JOBS=yes" >> lang/ghc/Makefile.local
Regards,
Christoph
--
Spare Space
* Kubilay Kocak [20200505 21:26]:
> On 5/05/2020 9:09 pm, andrew clarke wrote:
> > The -J option sounds like the way to go, provided I remember to use it
> > next time. Or I could instead set PARALLEL_JOBS=1 in poudriere.conf but then
> > build performance will suffer for ev
Yes, or, at least a notification that defaults have changed.
--
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 12:13 AM Alex V. Petrov
wrote:
> Hi All!
>
> I think that
I plan to remove the obsolete GNU binutils 2.17.50 objdump from the
base system in the next few days.
If you currently use objdump from the base system you can give
llvm-objdump a try instead - it is mostly compatible, but has a few
missing options and the output format may be slightly different.
Something like this maybe:
ALLOW_MAKE_JOBS_PACKAGES="pkg llvm* gcc* node* *webengine rust* firefox*
mame mess"
>From this Forums post:
https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/howto-speeding-up-poudriere-build-times.69431/#post-460170
HTH,
Jose
On 2020-05-05 04:09, andrew clarke wrote:
> On 2020-05-05
Hello,
I have been dealing with Poudriere for quite a while and one of the most
issues I have is, that I have ports which won't compile along with
another. Reason is mostly something like:
pkg-static: ImageMagick7-7.0.10.6 conflicts with ImageMagick6-6.9.11.6,1
(installs files into the same
On Tue, 5 May 2020 22:38:36 +0200 Leander Schaefer i...@netocean.de said
Hello,
I have been dealing with Poudriere for quite a while and one of the most
issues I have is, that I have ports which won't compile along with
another. Reason is mostly something like:
pkg-static: ImageMagick7-7.0.
Hello Chris,
thanks for your reply. Thanks for the hint about ports-mgmt/synth. I am
definitly going to have a look into this! Well, my Podriere is using
Jails by default. Is there any hack you applied for this issue to avoid?
Best regards,
Leander
Am 05.05.20 um 22:46 schrieb Chris:
On
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
19 matches
Mail list logo
