x11/x3270

Hello, Why is x11/x3270 marked as BROKEN? [root@jet /usr/ports/x11/x3270]# make fetch ===> x3270-3.3.15_3 is marked as broken: unfetchable. *** Error code 1 Stop. [root@jet /usr/ports/x11/x3270]# make fetch TRYBROKEN=yes Trying build of x3270-3.3.15_3 even though it is marked BROKEN. ===> x

Re: x11/x3270

Hi! > Why is x11/x3270 marked as BROKEN? Because the distfile is only available from the distcache. It needs to be available from some other site, otherwise the port is considered broken. > [root@jet /usr/ports/x11/x3270]# make fetch > ===> x3270-3.3.15_3 is marked as broken: unfetchable. > **

Re: x11/x3270

## Matthias Apitz (g...@unixarea.de): > Trying build of x3270-3.3.15_3 even though it is marked BROKEN. Hm. x11/x3270$ svn log distinfo r376982 | madpilot | 2015-01-13 20:15:59 +0100 (Tue, 13 Jan 2015) | 9 lines Last updat

Re: x11/x3270

Hi! > Hey, there's an opportunity for you to step up and update that port! > (And perhaps ping the maintainer if he's still around and interested > in that port, not having done anything in about five years is an > indicator of sorts. This port can be yours, at the cost of a patch!) This can be y

Re: x11/x3270

On 2/15/20 2:55 PM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi! Hey, there's an opportunity for you to step up and update that port! (And perhaps ping the maintainer if he's still around and interested in that port, not having done anything in about five years is an indicator of sorts. This port can be yours, at th

Starting with poudriere

I’ve setup a new FreeBSD 12.1 system and am going to give poudriere a whirl on it. The machine is currently setup as a two drive zfs mirror and I have used pkg to install a few basic things (sudo, zsh, poudriere itself, etc). I am reading through

Re: Starting with poudriere

Hi, Just a bit of a heads up that poudriere will require you to be on the new version of FreeBSD before you can build for it on the current system. For example, if you are running 12.1, and you upgrade poudriere's jail to 13.0, it will complain that you have to be running that version on the host

Re: Starting with poudriere

@lbutlr writes: > [...] > Sorry for the rather basic questions. > I'm also a poudriere beginner and/but I found this DigitalOcean tutorial very useful: https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/how-to-set-up-a-poudriere-build-system-to-create-packages-for-your-freebsd-servers g. __

Re: Starting with poudriere

On 15 Feb 2020, at 16:32, @lbutlr wrote: > Sorry for the rather basic questions. Thanks everyone for your comments. One more dumb question I can’t find the answer to. Let’s say I want to build and install a single port via poudrier. For the same of argument some port that has configuration opt

Re: Starting with poudriere

Hi, On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 11:03 PM @lbutlr wrote: > Let’s say I want to build and install a single port via poudrier. For the > same of argument some port that has configuration options I want to change. > Probably not ideal since you generally want to disable the FreeBSD repository, and use

Re: Starting with poudriere

On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 09:02:39PM -0700, @lbutlr wrote: > On 15 Feb 2020, at 16:32, @lbutlr wrote: > > Sorry for the rather basic questions. > > Thanks everyone for your comments. One more dumb question I can???t find the > answer to. > > Let???s say I want to build and install a single port v

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you

Re: Starting with poudriere

On 15 Feb 2020, at 21:43, Dan McGrath wrote: > You would run "poudriere bulk", then sit back sipping coffee while it > churns through all of the packages. Hang on a second, so the intended use for poudriere is to build ALL packages? Right now I have two jails setup, one for 12.1 amd64 and one fo