Build failures for logitechmediaserver in poudriere

2018-12-17 Thread Jimmy Renner
Hi, I'm getting some strange build failures for logitechmediaserver when building in poudriere. From ports everything is working fine, on the other hand the packaging step isn't done there :-) I get a lot of these in the build log: pkg-static: Unable to access file /wrkdirs/usr/ports/audi

Re: Build failures for logitechmediaserver in poudriere

2018-12-17 Thread Kubilay Kocak
On 17/12/2018 9:31 pm, Jimmy Renner wrote: Hi, I'm getting some strange build failures for logitechmediaserver when building in poudriere. From ports everything is working fine, on the other hand the packaging step isn't done there :-) I get a lot of these in the build log: pkg-static: Unabl

Re: thunderbird build error

2018-12-17 Thread Stefan Esser
Am 17.12.18 um 00:11 schrieb George Mitchell: > On 12/16/18 5:24 PM, Stefan Esser wrote: >> [...] >> I have (my version of) portmaster mostly working in a clean chroot jail. >> It is still a pure shell script (works with the FreeBSD /bin/sh and bash), >> thus portable to all architectures supported

Is there an option to make poudriere install implicit ports from repo instead of building them

2018-12-17 Thread Mel Pilgrim
I only need to build a single port plus the handful of private meta-ports I use for role management. It seems a terrible waste to have poudriere build the 500+ completely stock dependencies they pull in. Is there a way to have poudriere install implicitly-added pkgs from pkg.freebsd.org inste

Re: Is there an option to make poudriere install implicit ports from repo instead of building them

2018-12-17 Thread Matthias Petermann
Hello, I remember this is possible with ports-mgmt/synth [1]. Best regards, Matthias [1] https://github.com/jrmarino/synth Am 17.12.2018 um 14:15 schrieb Mel Pilgrim: I only need to build a single port plus the handful of private meta-ports I use for role management.  It seems a terrible was

Re: Is there an option to make poudriere install implicit ports from repo instead of building them

2018-12-17 Thread Jan Beich
Mel Pilgrim writes: > I only need to build a single port plus the handful of private > meta-ports I use for role management. It seems a terrible waste to > have poudriere build the 500+ completely stock dependencies they pull > in. Is there a way to have poudriere install implicitly-added pkgs

devel/jsoncpp and staging?

2018-12-17 Thread Steve Kargl
I must be missing a change in how staging works. % cd /usr/ports/devel/jsoncpp % make ===> Staging for jsoncpp-1.8.1_5 ===> Generating temporary packing list (cd /usr/ports/devel/jsoncpp/work/jsoncpp-1.8.1/include/ && /bin/sh -c '(/usr/bin/find -Ed $1 $3 | /usr/bin/cpio -dumpl $2 >/dev/null 2

Re: devel/jsoncpp and staging?

2018-12-17 Thread Steve Kargl
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 05:48:57PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > I must be missing a change in how staging works. > > % cd /usr/ports/devel/jsoncpp > % make > > ===> Staging for jsoncpp-1.8.1_5 > ===> Generating temporary packing list > (cd /usr/ports/devel/jsoncpp/work/jsoncpp-1.8.1/include/ &&

Re: devel/jsoncpp and staging?

2018-12-17 Thread Mathieu Arnold
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 07:25:10PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 05:48:57PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > > I must be missing a change in how staging works. > > > > % cd /usr/ports/devel/jsoncpp > > % make > > > > ===> Staging for jsoncpp-1.8.1_5 > > ===> Generating tempora