Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
For some time now (Firefox 60.x beta versions and on), I get the
following error, if I try to install www/firefox-i18n on 12.0-CURRENT amd64:
#make
make: "/usr/ports/Mk/Uses/gecko.mk" line 48: warning:
"/usr/local/bin/firefox --version 2>/dev/null" returned non-zero status
===> firefox-i18n-6
Rainer Hurling writes:
> For some time now (Firefox 60.x beta versions and on), I get the
> following error, if I try to install www/firefox-i18n on 12.0-CURRENT
> amd64:
Can you reproduce with firefox binary built by FreeBSD package cluster?
$ pkg delete -f firefox
$ pkg install firefox
$ make
Hello,
When I build Rust packages I get warnings like this one:
> warning: be sure to add
> `/usr/home/0mp/ports/games/genact/work/stage/usr/local/bin` to your PATH to
> be able to run the installed binaries
It is not very helpful when building ports. Do you think that we should
try to mute it
Am 17.05.18 um 14:42 schrieb Mateusz Piotrowski:
> Hello,
>
> When I build Rust packages I get warnings like this one:
>
>> warning: be sure to add
>> `/usr/home/0mp/ports/games/genact/work/stage/usr/local/bin` to your PATH to
>> be able to run the installed binaries
>
> It is not very helpful
Hi Jan,
Am 17.05.2018 um 13:21 schrieb Jan Beich:
> Rainer Hurling writes:
>
>> For some time now (Firefox 60.x beta versions and on), I get the
>> following error, if I try to install www/firefox-i18n on 12.0-CURRENT
>> amd64:
>
> Can you reproduce with firefox binary built by FreeBSD package
Hi All,
Could someone committer please have a look at this?
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227507
--
Best regards,
Nikolay
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubs
Sorry for answering myself. But I found the changes in Firefox 60.x,
please see above.
Am 17.05.2018 um 17:30 schrieb Rainer Hurling:
> Hi Jan,
>
> Am 17.05.2018 um 13:21 schrieb Jan Beich:
>> Rainer Hurling writes:
>>
>>> For some time now (Firefox 60.x beta versions and on), I get the
>>> fol
Hi!
> Could someone committer please have a look at this?
>
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227507
Done, thanks for the submission!
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 31013722 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@f
On 2018/05/14 20:14, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> What's wrong with a current practice. Why is it of any concern to you,
> John? Just curious that is not very clear from your message. It is like
> someone trying to moderate what people in general or some group in
> particular (e.g. freebsd committers) ar
On 2018/05/14 20:25, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 15/5/18 7:40 am, John W. O'Brien wrote:
>> Hello FreeBSD Ports,
>>
>> The Committer's Guide section on Commit Log Messages [0], doesn't cover
>> the use of the "Sponsored by" key word. As a non-committer contributor,
>> it only recently occurred to m
John, no, not really, sorry. Work is done, credit is given. The form and
amount of this credit is between whoever does the work and whoever is being
credited. I don't see why is there any third-party to be involved in
governing whether or not this credit is "appropriate", "sufficient" or "all
encom
On 2018/05/17 19:18, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> John, no, not really, sorry. Work is done, credit is given. The form and
> amount of this credit is between whoever does the work and whoever is
> being credited. I don't see why is there any third-party to be involved
> in governing whether or not this c
Well, if your employer feels slighted it's for him to bring it up with
you (see my previous rant on the amount and scope of the credit and who
parties involved). And then for you to bring it up with me if you feel
brave enough. :) I don't see how and why FreeBSD project can help in this
highly hy
On 2018/05/17 19:36, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> Well, if your employer feels slighted it's for him to bring it up with
> you (see my previous rant on the amount and scope of the credit and who
> parties involved). And then for you to bring it up with me if you feel
> brave enough. :) I don't see how
Hi!
> The FreeBSD project could help by asking committers to qualify
> "Sponsored by" lines to indicate which participant(s) is(are) sponsored,
> in way that is equivalent to the way that the actual work itself is
> customarily attributed.
This sounds reasonable, so I suggest that you submit a
pa
You guys are still trying to read and interpret labels on the t-shirts I
think. "Sponsored by: XYZ" in the commit message only means that some
undefined portion of the work has been in some form supported or encouraged
by XYZ. It does not mean or imply all work, it does not mean any particular
form
On 17 May 2018 at 21:15, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> The FreeBSD project could help by asking committers to qualify
>> "Sponsored by" lines to indicate which participant(s) is(are) sponsored,
>> in way that is equivalent to the way that the actual work itself is
>> customarily attributed.
>
> Th
18 matches
Mail list logo
