Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
Hello Steve
The host machine is homebuilt with:
motherboard: ASRock Z97 Pro3 - Z97Pro3
cpu: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4460 CPU @ 3.20GHz
Ram: 32GB
poudriere is running on zfs.
So this is what I did:
Previously on your suggestions, I lowered the number af of cpu's to 1 and was able to build a go
Thanks for that does seem like your machine can readily reproduce in
just a few seconds which is good. Here it usually takes days to trigger,
which is why its been so hard to make any progress on isolating the
issue; which its not clear if its go or kernel related.
Can you see if you can trigg
There is an issue in the current (2018.3.0_1) sysutils/py-salt, specific to
py36. The "cpython-36.opt-1.pyc" files included in the pkg seem to contain
pre-patched files.
Any more experienced porters want to offer advice on how to fix this in the
port?
reproduce:
1. install py36-salt (>=2018.3.0)
I have question about Quarterly branch commits.
Committers Guide says at 19.6.2
(https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/committers-guide/ports.html#ports-qa-blanket):
The following blanket approvals are in effect:
...
* Fixing shebangs, stripping installed libraries and binaries, and pl
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 04:38:14PM +, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
>
> I have question about Quarterly branch commits.
>
> Committers Guide says at 19.6.2
> (https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/committers-guide/ports.html#ports-qa-blanket):
>
>
> The following blanket approvals are in e
All,
I'm trying to make a port for Paul Wouters' hash-slinger tool. It
requires unbound built with the python bindings.
If I understand correctly, the way this would need to happen is that there
would need to be a "flavor" of dns/unbound that includes python (now that
flavors are a thing).
Hi Steven
I trust you have recieved the logfiles.
let me know if you need more tests.
On 27-04-2018 10:32, Steven Hartland wrote:
Thanks for that does seem like your machine can readily reproduce in just a few seconds which is
good. Here it usually takes days to trigger, which is why its been
