On 03.01.2018 01:06, Anthony Jenkins wrote:
> I'm having trouble building ports with a new Poudriere rig on a
> 12.0-CURRENT (git commit 423586ee). The ports that fail are ones that
> require a binary bootstrap package (e.g. lang/rust and java/openjdk8).
> The executables in these bootstrap packa
On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 03:31:46PM +0100, Jean-Sébastien Pédron wrote:
On 03.01.2018 01:06, Anthony Jenkins wrote:
I'm having trouble building ports with a new Poudriere rig on a
12.0-CURRENT (git commit 423586ee). The ports that fail are ones that
require a binary bootstrap package (e.g. lang/
Hi Mathieu,
Thank you for your review and tips.
I have just submitted the patch.
Rainer, QGis 2 may be able to use Qwt6 instead of Qwt5?
Regards.
Loïc
On 21.12.2017 17:10, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
Le 19/12/2017 à 20:48, L.Bartoletti a écrit :
Hi,
Here's my WIP
https://gitlab.com/lbartoletti
All the below were: NO_ZFS=yes , USE_TMPFS=no , not using
cccache, PARALLEL_JOBS=1 , ALLOW_MAKE_JOBS=yes . On the
RPi2 V1.1 I also set: MAX_EXECUTION_TIME=432000 ,
NOHANG_TIME=28800 .
Pine64+ 2GB: (so, 2GiBytes of RAM on cortex-a53, eMMC in usdcard slot via
adapter)
[05:45:14] [01] [00:00:00] Bui
Hi,
I maintain a port that has a new release which requires openssl 1.0.2 to
build. FreeBSD 10.3 and 10.4 both have openssl 1.0.1, and 11 onwards
have 1.0.2. Is there a magic way to have this port depend on ports
openssl for freebsd releases without openssl 1.0.2? I ran
find /usr/ports -exec g
05.01.2018 9:11, Matthew Luckie wrote:
> I maintain a port that has a new release which requires openssl 1.0.2 to
> build. FreeBSD 10.3 and 10.4 both have openssl 1.0.1, and 11 onwards
> have 1.0.2. Is there a magic way to have this port depend on ports
> openssl for freebsd releases without ope
On Fri, 5 Jan 2018 15:11:00 +1300 "Matthew Luckie" said
Hi,
I maintain a port that has a new release which requires openssl 1.0.2 to
build. FreeBSD 10.3 and 10.4 both have openssl 1.0.1, and 11 onwards
have 1.0.2. Is there a magic way to have this port depend on ports
openssl for freebsd rel
On Fri, 5 Jan 2018 15:44:31 +1300 "Matthew Luckie" said
On 01/05/18 15:37, Chris H wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Jan 2018 15:11:00 +1300 "Matthew Luckie" said
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I maintain a port that has a new release which requires openssl 1.0.2 to
>> build. FreeBSD 10.3 and 10.4 both have openssl 1.0.1
On 01/05/18 15:37, Chris H wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Jan 2018 15:11:00 +1300 "Matthew Luckie" said
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I maintain a port that has a new release which requires openssl 1.0.2 to
>> build. FreeBSD 10.3 and 10.4 both have openssl 1.0.1, and 11 onwards
>> have 1.0.2. Is there a magic way to have
On 05.01.2018 09:44, Matthew Luckie wrote:
> My main worry is that I could not find a single port that apparently
> depends on security/openssl. I'm worried that its more complicated than
> simply declaring a dependency on security/openssl on particular freebsd
> versions because other ports that
On 1/5/18 5:09 PM, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> On 05.01.2018 09:44, Matthew Luckie wrote:
>
>> My main worry is that I could not find a single port that apparently
>> depends on security/openssl. I'm worried that its more complicated than
>> simply declaring a dependency on security/openssl on parti
On Fri, 5 Jan 2018 17:16:30 +1300 "Matthew Luckie" said
On 1/5/18 5:09 PM, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> On 05.01.2018 09:44, Matthew Luckie wrote:
>
>> My main worry is that I could not find a single port that apparently
>> depends on security/openssl. I'm worried that its more complicated than
12 matches
Mail list logo
