Re: Option vs. flavor?

2017-12-17 Thread Yuri
On 12/16/17 22:06, Adam Weinberger wrote: Is the port of any use without the data file? If everybody who uses the port needs the data file, I wouldn't make it an option at all. The precedent is that ports with huge data files are marked NO_PACKAGE, so there's no impact on the package builders

Re: Flavor or not for this port?

2017-12-17 Thread Rainer Hurling
Am 02.11.2017 um 07:41 schrieb Rainer Hurling: > Am 02.11.2017 um 07:13 schrieb L.Bartoletti: >> Hi, >> >> I want to take x11-toolkits/qwt{5,6}-* >> >> Both are built for Qt4. I especially need qwt6 for Qt5. Since we have >> flavors. Is it better to add a Qt5 flavor for Qwt6 or simply add a >> x11-

Re: Can we have multiple flavors for a port?

2017-12-17 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 16/12/2017 14:24, Stefan Esser wrote: > Am 16.12.17 um 14:51 schrieb Matthew Seaman: >> >> I have a review up to add a USES=django -- >> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D12592 which I'm now modifying to be FLAVORS >> compatible given that has hit the tree. >> >> Now, we currently have ports for 4 di

Re: new portmaster fails to build devel/py-libzfs@py36 because of failing cython

2017-12-17 Thread Stefan Esser
Am 17.12.17 um 05:47 schrieb Jim Trigg: > > > On December 15, 2017 4:50:53 AM EST, Johan Hendriks > wrote: >> Hello all. >> First of all thank you for the update of portmaster, much appreciated. >> >> When i am updating my ports, portmaster fails with the following error. >> >> > Compressin

Re: OSS Audio

2017-12-17 Thread Stefan Esser
Am 17.12.17 um 02:06 schrieb blubee blubeeme: > This is why I am bringing up the issue and why I said the first step would > be porting the proper 4Front OSS into the kernel. > > It doesn't have to be the default at first but if it's not in the kernel > why bother wasting time to have it rejected

Poudriere build of Python36

2017-12-17 Thread Gary J. Hayers
Hi all, Can anyone offer some advice as to what's happening here? =>> Building lang/python36 build started at Sun Dec 17 12:35:43 GMT 2017 port directory: /usr/ports/lang/python36 package name: python36-3.6.3 building for: FreeBSD 11:1-AMD64-HEAD-ports-job-04 11.1-STABLE FreeBSD 11.1-STABLE amd

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2017-12-17 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you

Re: OSS Audio

2017-12-17 Thread blubee blubeeme
On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 9:11 PM, Stefan Esser wrote: > Am 17.12.17 um 02:06 schrieb blubee blubeeme: > > This is why I am bringing up the issue and why I said the first step > would > > be porting the proper 4Front OSS into the kernel. > > > > It doesn't have to be the default at first but if it'

Re: Option vs. flavor?

2017-12-17 Thread Adam Weinberger
On 17 Dec, 2017, at 1:48, Yuri wrote: On 12/16/17 22:06, Adam Weinberger wrote: Is the port of any use without the data file? If everybody who uses the port needs the data file, I wouldn't make it an option at all. The precedent is that ports with huge data files are marked NO_PACKAGE, so

Stopping make in a port

2017-12-17 Thread bob prohaska
>From time to time I would like to abort a make session in /usr/ports. In the past, one could get away with simply using kill or ctrl-c, but now that seems to keep make from restarting, with an error along the lines of "can't cd to /tmp/. which does not seem easy to fix. What is the appropriat

Re: Option vs. flavor?

2017-12-17 Thread Yuri
On 12/17/17 06:32, Adam Weinberger wrote: Ah okay. Then I'd say, make a slave port that just fetches/extracts/installs the data files, and an option in the Geant4 master port that defaults to off. Set the slave port to NO_PACKAGE. Ok, I will do it this way. I wouldn't go the flavor route,

www/payara port update looking for committer

2017-12-17 Thread Dmytro Bilokha
Hello! May some kind committer take a look at https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224405 It is a diff to update the www/payara port. Thanks. -- Dmytro Bilokha dmy...@posteo.net +38-050-607-41-43 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing li

Re: OSS Audio

2017-12-17 Thread Sid
>> Stefan Esser; Sun Dec 17 13:11:22 UTC 2017 >> Do you propose to just update the code to what 4Front provides? >> This may work for you as individual user, but the 4Front license makes >> it impossible to commit that version to FreeBSD. (That was the reason >> to stay at a reasonably licensed ve

Re: Option vs. flavor?

2017-12-17 Thread Adam Weinberger
On 17 Dec, 2017, at 11:10, Yuri wrote: On 12/17/17 06:32, Adam Weinberger wrote: Ah okay. Then I'd say, make a slave port that just fetches/extracts/installs the data files, and an option in the Geant4 master port that defaults to off. Set the slave port to NO_PACKAGE. Ok, I will do it thi

Procmail got updated!

2017-12-17 Thread Dave Horsfall
Doing my regular update, and... Upgrading procmail from 3.22_9 to 3.22_10... Good grief; who's the masochist who volunteered to support this obscure insecure and hitherto-unsupported scripting language? -- Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security will suffer."

Re: OSS Audio

2017-12-17 Thread blubee blubeeme
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017, 02:18 Sid wrote: > >> Stefan Esser; Sun Dec 17 13:11:22 UTC 2017 > >> Do you propose to just update the code to what 4Front provides? > > >> This may work for you as individual user, but the 4Front license makes > >> it impossible to commit that version to FreeBSD. (That was