FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you

Re: For armv7 (cross build target): multimedia/libvpx depends on the GNU C library function getauxval and so fails to build; so, disable its expectation?

On 06.12.2017 19:08, Ian Lepore wrote: On Wed, 2017-12-06 at 18:37 +0100, Jan Beich wrote: Mark Millard writes: For armv7 attempting to build multimedia/libvpx (via an indirect dependency) leads to: cp libvpx_g.a libvpx.a vpx_ports/arm_cpudetect.c.o: In function `arm_cpu_caps': /wrkdirs/u

Re: FreeBSD Port: php72-7.2.0 : trouble with lang/php72 & libargon2

Aloha, 1. In the worst case (when built on remote poudriere) php72 crashes when using the PASSWORD_ARGON2I algo for password_hash. pkg check --dependencies reports problem. 2. On a separate machine. When building from local ports, password_hash(...PASSWORD_ARGON2I) works but pkg check --depende

Re: Working on FLAVOR support in portmaster

Quoting Baptiste Daroussin (from Thu, 7 Dec 2017 14:54:27 +0100): On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 02:49:45PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: Alternatively, how would a FreeBSD committer like Stefan or Torsten or me or whoever gain write access to https://github.com/freebsd/portmaster/ so get som

Re: Working on FLAVOR support in portmaster

On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 02:13:09PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting Baptiste Daroussin (from Thu, 7 Dec 2017 14:54:27 > +0100): > > > On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 02:49:45PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > > > Alternatively, how would a FreeBSD committer like Stefan or > > > Torsten

Re: THANK YOU for flavors!

Mel Pilgrim wrote on 2017/12/07 00:51: In the midst of all the negative noise, I thought I'd post and say thank you for bring in this feature. I've been chomping at the bit to try flavours out since I heard about them. I started flavouring my company's internal Ports Tree extension the evening

Re: For armv7 (cross build target): multimedia/libvpx depends on the GNU C library function getauxval and so fails to build; so, disable its expectation?

Michal Meloun writes: > Having linux compatible getauxval() was my original plan. > But during testing, I found that some ports autodetect getauxval() > presence and if exists, then full linux implementation is required. > My bad is that I didn't realize that the presence of "sys/auxv/h" > causes

devel/gogs is looking for a committer

Hi, Can someone please have a look at https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224113 Thanks, Dmitri ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-p

Re: For armv7 (cross build target): multimedia/libvpx depends on the GNU C library function getauxval and so fails to build; so, disable its expectation?

Michal Meloun writes: > I don't think that full emulation of getauxval() is best - > the port wants (from memory, incomplete) at least, additionally to > AT_HWCAPS(2) : > > AT_PLATFORM > AT_SECURE > AT_RANDOM > AT_CLKTCK > > I don't think that we want to implement linux compatible platform > stri

Re: FreeBSD Port: php72-7.2.0 : trouble with lang/php72 & libargon2

On 08/12/17 12:33, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote: > >> 1. In the worst case (when built on remote poudriere) php72 crashes when >> using the PASSWORD_ARGON2I algo for password_hash. pkg check >> --dependencies reports problem. >> >> 2. On a separate machine. When building from local ports, >> password

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

A little concernedthat I got no response to this. Is Procmail dead for most of you guys(ducking) Best regards, Jos Chrispijn Op 24-11-2017 om 13:32 schreef Jos Chrispijn: Dear sunpoet, Noticed this week following issue on procmail. Vulnerabilities check vulnxml file up-to-date procmail-3.22

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

Hi, On Friday, December 08, 2017 17:12:45 +0100 Jos Chrispijn wrote: > A little concernedthat I got no response to this. > Is Procmail dead for most of you guys(ducking) See https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223777 specifically the patch in "Comment 2". I have been using this p

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

Nick, Op 8-12-2017 om 17:32 schreef N.J. Mann: See https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223777 specifically the patch in "Comment 2". I have been using this patch for a few days without problems. Sadly the vulnerability check still fails. Unfortunatly I am neither that of a progr

Re: THANK YOU for flavors! (fwd)

On Thu, 7 Dec 2017, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: On Thursday, 7 December 2017 at 11:02:51 +1100, Dave Horsfall wrote: On Thu, 7 Dec 2017 11:01:51 +1100 (EST), Dave Horsfall wrote: Since we're being pedantic, note that this should be AEDT. EST is ambiguous, but in general refers to the east coa

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Fri, 8 Dec 2017, Jos Chrispijn wrote: A little concernedthat I got no response to this. Is Procmail dead for most of you guys(ducking) procmail is ancient, and has had known quality issues for much of the time. Consider maildrop as a more powerful and more maintained replacement that is

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 09:58:55AM -0700, Warren Block wrote: > On Fri, 8 Dec 2017, Jos Chrispijn wrote: > > > A little concernedthat I got no response to this. > > Is Procmail dead for most of you guys(ducking) > > procmail is ancient, and has had known quality issues for much of the > time. C

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

Hi! > A little concerned that I got no response to this. > Is Procmail dead for most of you guys(ducking) We'll work the patch in, it just takes a little time 8-( -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 3 years to go ! ___

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Fri, 8 Dec 2017, Steve Kargl wrote: On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 09:58:55AM -0700, Warren Block wrote: On Fri, 8 Dec 2017, Jos Chrispijn wrote: A little concernedthat I got no response to this. Is Procmail dead for most of you guys(ducking) procmail is ancient, and has had known quality issue

Availability of py-certbot-apache

I was wondering if anyone could tell me when the "py-certbot-apache" port might be available? The port's message indicates that it will be available in the "security/py-certbot-apache" port; however, it obviously isn't. -- Carmel pgpC5XCqi8lD9.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Availability of py-certbot-apache

Hi! > I was wondering if anyone could tell me when the "py-certbot-apache" port > might be available? > The port's message indicates that it will be available in the > "security/py-certbot-apache" port; > however, it obviously isn't. There are few PRs open with certbot stuff. One is the -apache

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

El día viernes, diciembre 08, 2017 a las 11:19:03a. m. -0700, Warren Block escribió: > > I do, and invoke procmail from a .forward file. > > > > % cat ~/.forward > > "|exec /usr/local/bin/procmail -f-" > > > > Do you know if maildrop can be used in a similar way? I > > suppose I have some readi

PR looking for committer

Can a committer have a look at this devel/visualparadigm PR? https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223888 Thanks in advance. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe,

Updating ports that use FLAVOR with portmaster

How do you do this? I have a number of py ports that need to be updated, but portmaster chokes on them. I don't see anything about FLAVOR in the man page. Do we actually have to update all these ports manually, one at a time? Paul Schmehl, Retired As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions ar

py-setuptools fails to build with FLAVOR

# cd ../py-setuptools [root@colo11 /usr/ports/devel/py-setuptools]# make distclean ===> Cleaning for py27-setuptools-36.5.0 ===> Cleaning for py35-setuptools-36.5.0 ===> Cleaning for py36-setuptools-36.5.0 ===> Cleaning for py34-setuptools-36.5.0 ===> Deleting distfiles for py27-setuptools-36

[CFT] Mesa 17.3 update (mesa-libs, mesa-dri, libosmesa, clover)

New minor Mesa release is available[1], see bug 223195[2] for the patch. I'd like users to test on Radeon and Intel graphics using kernel drivers shipped with FreeBSD 10.3 and 11.1 as those're more likely to regress than drm-next-kmod. Make sure to check OpenGL still works (if it did before) and EG

Re: py-setuptools fails to build with FLAVOR

On Fri, 08 Dec 2017 14:41:29 -0600 Paul Schmehl wrote: > # cd ../py-setuptools > [root@colo11 /usr/ports/devel/py-setuptools]# make distclean > ===> Cleaning for py27-setuptools-36.5.0 > ===> Cleaning for py35-setuptools-36.5.0 > ===> Cleaning for py36-setuptools-36.5.0 > ===> Cleaning for py

Re: Updating ports that use FLAVOR with portmaster

On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote: > How do you do this? I have a number of py ports that need to be updated, > but portmaster chokes on them. I don't see anything about FLAVOR in the man > page. Do we actually have to update all these ports manually, one at a time? > ​You wait

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 11:19:03AM -0700, Warren Block wrote: > On Fri, 8 Dec 2017, Steve Kargl wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 09:58:55AM -0700, Warren Block wrote: > >> > >> procmail is ancient, and has had known quality issues for much of the > >> time. Consider maildrop as a more powerful a

Re: Updating ports that use FLAVOR with portmaster

--On December 8, 2017 at 12:49:44 PM -0800 Freddie Cash wrote: On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote: How do you do this? I have a number of py ports that need to be updated, but portmaster chokes on them. I don't see anything about FLAVOR in the man page. Do we actually ha

black square in the gimp's gimp

Good afternoon! I had a black square in the gimp's gimp on my left How to fix it? -- Желаю вам поддержки Свыше и успеха! С уважением, Ваш Владимир Тимофиев -- Желаю вам поддержки Свыше и успеха! С уважением, Ваш Владимир Тимофиев ___

make reinstall does not work

I had a strange error: Make reinstall does not work anymore in the port (10.3-amd64) also FORCE_PKG_REGISTER. All other make commands works fine. I don't know if it is related to FLAVORS. make reinstall ended up e.g. with:  Registering installation for gtk2-2.24.31 *** Error code 70 Stop. m

Re: Updating ports that use FLAVOR with portmaster

On Fri, 08 Dec 2017 15:14:11 -0600 "Paul Schmehl" said --On December 8, 2017 at 12:49:44 PM -0800 Freddie Cash wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Paul Schmehl > wrote: > > > > How do you do this? I have a number of py ports that need to be updated, > but portmaster chokes on the

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Fri, 8 Dec 2017, Matthias Apitz wrote: El día viernes, diciembre 08, 2017 a las 11:19:03a. m. -0700, Warren Block escribió: I do, and invoke procmail from a .forward file. % cat ~/.forward "|exec /usr/local/bin/procmail -f-" Do you know if maildrop can be used in a similar way? I suppo

Re: Updating ports that use FLAVOR with portmaster

On Fri, 8 Dec 2017, Paul Schmehl wrote: As my second post shows, I can't make FLAVOR=py27 install either. So, I guess I'm dead in the water. Until I can install py-setuptools, nothing else will work, including devel/llvm40. All I've had to do was py-setuptools. The default flavor is py27, wh

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

El día viernes, diciembre 08, 2017 a las 03:13:02p. m. -0700, Warren Block escribió: > > Hmm, why -d ${USER} if this is already known who I am from the > > ~/.forward file location? > > Because as a sysadmin, then you can copy it to another user without > having to edit it each time. Hmm, and

Re: make reinstall does not work

When I see this Error code 70 I do a make deinstall and then a make install. That worked for me jaap > On Dec 8, 2017, at 22:35, Walter Schwarzenfeld > wrote: > > I had a strange error: Make reinstall does not work anymore in the port > (10.3-amd64) also FORCE_PKG_REGISTER. > > All

Re: make reinstall does not work

Sorry for the noise. I had overlooked 10.3 was EOL on 30.11. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Updating ports that use FLAVOR with portmaster

--On December 8, 2017 at 1:38:24 PM -0800 Chris H wrote: It doesn't appear that pkg recognized FLAVOR either. I believe that pkg(8) version 1.10.3 will give it to you. What revision of ports are you currently using? pkg is 1.10.3. I moved the patch that was causing the failure, and the por

Re: Updating ports that use FLAVOR with portmaster

--On December 8, 2017 at 3:16:19 PM -0700 Warren Block wrote: On Fri, 8 Dec 2017, Paul Schmehl wrote: As my second post shows, I can't make FLAVOR=py27 install either. So, I guess I'm dead in the water. Until I can install py-setuptools, nothing else will work, including devel/llvm40. Al

Re: make reinstall does not work

[rearranged] On Friday, 8 December 2017 at 23:42:40 +0100, Jaap Akkerhuis wrote: >> On Dec 8, 2017, at 22:35, Walter Schwarzenfeld >> wrote: >> >> I had a strange error: Make reinstall does not work anymore in the port >> (10.3-amd64) also FORCE_PKG_REGISTER. >> >> All other make commands work

Re: make reinstall does not work

On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > [rearranged] > > On Friday, 8 December 2017 at 23:42:40 +0100, Jaap Akkerhuis wrote: > >> On Dec 8, 2017, at 22:35, Walter Schwarzenfeld < > w.schwarzenf...@utanet.at> wrote: > >> > >> I had a strange error: Make reinstall does not wor

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Fri, 8 Dec 2017, Steve Kargl wrote: First, there is movement afoot to remove sendmail from FreeBSD and replace it with dma(1). There is? Is there anything else that they're going to spring on us? (I'm still annoyed that they removed "jive" because it upset someone's delicate sensibilitie

Re: make reinstall does not work

On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 10:35:50PM +0100, Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote: > I had a strange error: Make reinstall does not work anymore in the port > (10.3-amd64) also FORCE_PKG_REGISTER. > > All other make commands works fine. I don't know if it is related to > FLAVORS. > > make reinstall ended up e

Re: make reinstall does not work

On Friday, 8 December 2017 at 18:29:25 -0500, Shawn Webb wrote: > On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 10:35:50PM +0100, Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote: >> I had a strange error: Make reinstall does not work anymore in the port >> (10.3-amd64) also FORCE_PKG_REGISTER. >> >> All other make commands works fine. I do

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Sat, 9 Dec 2017 10:16:54 +1100 (EST) "Dave Horsfall" said On Fri, 8 Dec 2017, Steve Kargl wrote: > First, there is movement afoot to remove sendmail from FreeBSD and > replace it with dma(1). There is? Is there anything else that they're going to spring on us? (I'm still annoyed that t

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Sat, Dec 09, 2017 at 10:16:54AM +1100, Dave Horsfall wrote: > On Fri, 8 Dec 2017, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > First, there is movement afoot to remove sendmail from FreeBSD and > > replace it with dma(1). > > There is? Is there anything else that they're going to spring on us? > https://lists

new firefox runs fine but won't open most web sites please advise

I just pkg installed the latest firefox for freebsd11 and suddenly all the most usefule websites are unavailable: google mail, you tube, schwab to name a few. I live on freebsd and I live on firefox. this version 54 of firefox works fine on a different machine. the new one 56.2_11 see below ref

Re: make reinstall does not work

On Sat, 9 Dec 2017 09:52:02 +1100 Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > Yes, I've seen this too and used the same workaround. > > Has something changed? Does 'make reinstall' still work for others? Not work for me. FreeBSD rimwks 11.1-STABLE FreeBSD 11.1-STABLE #2 r325400M + all updated ports _

Re: new firefox runs fine but won't open most web sites please advise

Is your time correct? That usually sounds like a time problem. On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Space Cadet wrote: > I just pkg installed the latest firefox for freebsd11 and suddenly all the > most usefule websites are unavailable: google mail, you tube, schwab to > name a few. > > I live on fr

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

Hi! > > > First, there is movement afoot to remove sendmail from FreeBSD and > > > replace it with dma(1). > Hmm. This does not come as good news to me. I've been working on an antispam > system that targets the use of Sendmail, If sendmail is available via ports, wouldn't that be enough ? --

Re: new firefox runs fine but won't open most web sites please advise

> On 8 Dec, 2017, at 18:32, Space Cadet wrote: > > I just pkg installed the latest firefox for freebsd11 and suddenly all the > most usefule websites are unavailable: google mail, you tube, schwab to > name a few. > > I live on freebsd and I live on firefox. this version 54 of firefox works >

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Sat, 9 Dec 2017, Kurt Jaeger wrote: [ On removing Sendmail from FreeBSD ] If sendmail is available via ports, wouldn't that be enough ? It better be in ports (but don't look at me; I have my hands full with my Mac & iPad with possibly an iPhone and an Android thrown in, and two Penguins)

RE: py-setuptools fails to build with FLAVOR

> portmaster -o devel/py-setuptools py27-setuptools-36.5.0 That way for py27 is okay. But, "portmaster -o devel/py-setuptools py36-setuptools" fuses dependency trees with py27-setuptools. To fix it, we need to use the "make deinstall install" directly into the list of "pkg query %o `pkg info -qr

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Fri, 8 Dec 2017 17:25:22 -0800 said On Sat, Dec 09, 2017 at 10:16:54AM +1100, Dave Horsfall wrote: > On Fri, 8 Dec 2017, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > First, there is movement afoot to remove sendmail from FreeBSD and > > replace it with dma(1). > > There is? Is there anything else that they'

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Sat, 9 Dec 2017 02:59:28 +0100 "Kurt Jaeger" said Hi! > > > First, there is movement afoot to remove sendmail from FreeBSD and > > > replace it with dma(1). > Hmm. This does not come as good news to me. I've been working on an antispam > system that targets the use of Sendmail, If sendm

Flavors support of portupgrade

Hello. Poudriere and synth already support flavors. As for portmaster, Stefan Esser (s...@freebsd.org) said he is working now. Then what about portupgrade? Is anybody working? --- Yasuhiro KIMURA ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Fri, 8 Dec 2017, Steve Kargl wrote: https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2017-December/018712.html Well, I saw no reason to subscribe to freebsd-arch (I'm on enough lists as it is)... Are there any other lists that we should be following? I guess a suit and tie will be requi

Re: Flavors support of portupgrade

On Sat, 9 Dec 2017 at 5:18 pm, Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote: > Hello. > > Poudriere and synth already support flavors. As for portmaster, Stefan > Esser (s...@freebsd.org) said he is working now. Then what about > portupgrade? Is anybody working? > > --- > Yasuhiro KIMURA > _

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Sat, 9 Dec 2017 15:12:12 +1100 (EST) "Dave Horsfall" said On Fri, 8 Dec 2017, Steve Kargl wrote: > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2017-December/018712.html Well, I saw no reason to subscribe to freebsd-arch (I'm on enough lists as it is)... Are there any other lists tha

Re: Flavors support of portupgrade

On Sat, 09 Dec 2017 05:20:47 + "Ben Woods" said On Sat, 9 Dec 2017 at 5:18 pm, Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote: > Hello. > > Poudriere and synth already support flavors. As for portmaster, Stefan > Esser (s...@freebsd.org) said he is working now. Then what about > portupgrade? Is anybody working? >

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

Chris H wrote: P.S. Please try to keep it civil. Ok.. . Michelle :) ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: make reinstall does not work

> On 9. Dec 2017, at 12:29 AM, Shawn Webb wrote: > > This is due to this commit: > https://github.com/freebsd/pkg/commit/7991c49665419916210ad589d4a85fd2a7f58b37 > > The standard procedure for reinstall is to do a deinstall first. I > guess it's pretty common just to issue `make reinstall` (whi

Re: Flavors support of portupgrade

From: Ben Woods Subject: Re: Flavors support of portupgrade Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2017 05:20:47 + > Hi Yasuhiro, > Bryan Drewery has generously said he plans to look into this over the next > couple of weeks: > > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2017-December/111445.html > > Re