Hi,
> On 30. Nov 2017, at 4:32 PM, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>
> | See Ports now have flavors enabled|
> | Tool developers, see https://wiki.freebsd.org/Ports/FlavorsTools|
> | All Python dependencies must have @${PY_FLAVOR} appended to them|
Very nice work, a thank you to all the people who wor
> On 1. Dec 2017, at 9:28 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>
> Le 01/12/2017 à 07:20, Franco Fichtner a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>>> On 30. Nov 2017, at 4:32 PM, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>>>
>>> | See Ports now have flavors enabled|
>>> | Tool developers, see https://wiki.freebsd.org/Ports/FlavorsTools|
>>>
Le 01/12/2017 à 07:20, Franco Fichtner a écrit :
> Hi,
>
>> On 30. Nov 2017, at 4:32 PM, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>>
>> | See Ports now have flavors enabled|
>> | Tool developers, see https://wiki.freebsd.org/Ports/FlavorsTools|
>> | All Python dependencies must have @${PY_FLAVOR} appended to them
I got several failure notices with this error:
===> Carla-1.9.7.b.279 depends on package: py36-sip>=4.19.2 - not found
===> Carla-1.9.7.b.279 depends on package:
/packages/All/py36-sip-4.19.2,1.txz - not found
===> USE_PACKAGE_DEPENDS_ONLY set - not building missing dependency from
source
*2* 09:05 (25) "py-pytz" root@thompson# make run-depends-list
py27-pytz-2017.3,1: "/usr/ports/devel/py-setuptools@py27" non-existent --
dependency list incomplete
/usr/ports/lang/python27
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.o
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
Le 01/12/2017 à 10:17, ja...@thompson.dyslexicfish.net a écrit :
> *2* 09:05 (25) "py-pytz" root@thompson# make run-depends-list
> py27-pytz-2017.3,1: "/usr/ports/devel/py-setuptools@py27" non-existent --
> dependency list incomplete
> /usr/ports/lang/python27
I fixed both build and run-depends-l
Just updatet the ports tree to r455280.
No python depending port is building anymore.
According to
/usr/ports/UPDATING, tag 20171130, some has to do "make FLAVOUR=pyXX" for a
certain port.
This weird text also states, that poudriere >3.2.X users also do not have to
worry.
First: running recent
Hi Mathieu,
I personaly use Make depends-list in a python tools (
https://gitlab.com/lbartoletti/portsgraph) to draw a graph of dependencies
from ports. I hope release it a day.
Regards.
Envoyé de mon smartphone BlackBerry 10.
Message d'origine
De: Mathieu Arnold
Envoyé: vendredi 1 déce
Le Thu, 30 Nov 2017 16:05:20 +0100,
Patrick Lamaiziere a écrit :
Hello,
> Does Virtualbox work for you on 11-STABLE (today stable) ?
>
> I've tried virtualbox 5.2 (built from port and packages) and 5.1
> (from quarterly packages) and when using a guest (windows 7) it hangs
> very often, I'm ev
On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 03:33:10PM +0100, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
> Le Thu, 30 Nov 2017 16:05:20 +0100,
> Patrick Lamaiziere a écrit :
>
> Hello,
>
> > Does Virtualbox work for you on 11-STABLE (today stable) ?
> >
> > I've tried virtualbox 5.2 (built from port and packages) and 5.1
> > (fro
I have not dived down this deep into the ports => pkg build system
before, so excuse me if I get this wrong.
TLDR;
-
I suspect that the package I get from beefy12 in this build:
https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/builds/default:default:head-amd64:p455158_s326378:beefy12
was built in a jail with
Oliver Schonrock writes:
> I suspect that the package I get from beefy12 in this build:
>
> https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/builds/default:default:head-amd64:p455158_s326378:beefy12
>
> was built in a jail with clang < 4.0.0 (ie FreeBSD 11, not 11.1 or
> stable). My local machine is FreeBSD 11.1-R
First, welcome flavors. It has been badly needed for a while and is going
to clean up a couple of messes that have been plaguing the port system for
a long time.
Second, whither port msanagement tools? At least portmaster now appears
dead. Any reason to expect it to be workable again? I have not t
So, I must be missing something. I have a poudriere jail specific
make.conf like this:
#
#unset some options by default
OPTIONS_UNSET= ALSA APIDOCS BONJOUR CUPS DEBUG DOCBOOK DOCS EXAMPLES GNUTLS
HTMLDOCS \
PULSEAUDIO SOUND STATIC TESTS X11 XINERAMA XORG
#fetch arguments - set timeou
Hi!
For a very specific app I'm looking for a way to enable
Java support in firefox-esr -- does anyone know how to do this ?
Thanks!
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 3 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mail
On 01/12/17 17:54, Jan Beich wrote:
> Why do you use 12.0-CURRENT packages on 11.1-RELEASE?
>
> http://beefy12.nyi.freebsd.org/data/head-amd64-default/p455158_s326378/logs/node8-8.9.1_1.log
> contains 'llvm_version': '5.0',
>
> http://beefy9.nyi.freebsd.org/data/110amd64-default/455158/logs/node8
> On 1 Dec, 2017, at 10:59, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
> First, welcome flavors. It has been badly needed for a while and is going
> to clean up a couple of messes that have been plaguing the port system for
> a long time.
>
> Second, whither port msanagement tools? At least portmaster now appears
>
Op 1 dec. 2017 19:06 schreef "Henrik Hudson" :
So, I must be missing something. I have a poudriere jail specific
make.conf like this:
#
#unset some options by default
OPTIONS_UNSET= ALSA APIDOCS BONJOUR CUPS DEBUG DOCBOOK DOCS EXAMPLES GNUTLS
HTMLDOCS \
PULSEAUDIO SOUND STATIC TESTS X
> First, welcome flavors. It has been badly needed for a while and is going to
> clean up a couple of messes that have been plaguing the port system for a
> long time.
>
> Second, whither port msanagement tools? At least portmaster now appears
> dead. Any reason to expect it to be workable again?
(disclaimer: only portmgr@ knows enough details how builds are done)
Oliver Schonrock writes:
> I am not familiar with the intricacies of how the relevant package is
> selected. Looking at this page again:
>
> https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/
Only builds from "Type: package" are uploaded to pkg.
On 01/12/17 18:46, Jan Beich wrote:
> Only builds from "Type: package" are uploaded to pkg.freebsd.org.
> Packages are built on the *oldest* supported release for a given branch.
> Until a day ago packages for 11.* were built on 11.0 which has Clang 3.8
> in base. The next build should happen on 11
On Fri, 01 Dec 2017, René Ladan wrote:
> Op 1 dec. 2017 19:06 schreef "Henrik Hudson" :
>
> So, I must be missing something. I have a poudriere jail specific
> make.conf like this:
>
> #
> #unset some options by default
> OPTIONS_UNSET= ALSA APIDOCS BONJOUR CUPS DEBUG DOCBOOK DOCS EXAMPLES G
On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 07:21:22PM +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Hi!
For a very specific app I'm looking for a way to enable
Java support in firefox-esr -- does anyone know how to do this ?
Thanks!
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 3 years to go !
ports/UPDATING does not seem to include an entry noting
the last subversion revision prior to the flipping on
flavors. Is revision 455205 the penultimate revision?
--
Steve
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/li
> On 1 Dec, 2017, at 13:07, Steve Kargl
> wrote:
>
> ports/UPDATING does not seem to include an entry noting
> the last subversion revision prior to the flipping on
> flavors. Is revision 455205 the penultimate revision?
https://svnweb.freebsd.org
--
Adam Weinberger
ad...@adamw.org
https://
On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 01:42:27PM -0700, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> > On 1 Dec, 2017, at 13:07, Steve Kargl
> > wrote:
> >
> > ports/UPDATING does not seem to include an entry noting
> > the last subversion revision prior to the flipping on
> > flavors. Is revision 455205 the penultimate revisio
On Fri, 01 Dec 2017, Henrik Hudson wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Dec 2017, René Ladan wrote:
>
> > Op 1 dec. 2017 19:06 schreef "Henrik Hudson" :
> >
> > So, I must be missing something. I have a poudriere jail specific
> > make.conf like this:
> >
> > #
> > #unset some options by default
> > OPTIONS
Hi,
Currently, with npm-5.4.2_2, I'm getting:
WARNING: You are likely using a version of node-tar or npm that is
incompatible with this version of Node.js.
Please use either the version of npm that is bundled with Node.js, or
a version of npm (> 5.5.1 or < 5.4.0) or node-tar (> 4.0.1) that is
com
On 01/12/17 22:46, Jonathan Chen wrote:
> Currently, with npm-5.4.2_2, I'm getting:
do you really need node9? that is what you are getting by installing
www/node.
I had more luck with "www/npm-node8" which is a combination of the two
that actually works OK together?
--
Oliver Schönrock
Mobile
On 12/01/2017 14:46, Jonathan Chen wrote:
Hi,
Currently, with npm-5.4.2_2, I'm getting:
WARNING: You are likely using a version of node-tar or npm that is
incompatible with this version of Node.js.
Please use either the version of npm that is bundled with Node.js, or
a version of npm (> 5.5.1
On 2 December 2017 at 11:55, Oliver Schonrock wrote:
> On 01/12/17 22:46, Jonathan Chen wrote:
>> Currently, with npm-5.4.2_2, I'm getting:
>
> do you really need node9? that is what you are getting by installing
> www/node.
www/node is what gets installed as a dependancy when installing
www/npm.
On 01/12/17 23:17, Jonathan Chen wrote:
> www/node is what gets installed as a dependancy when installing
> www/npm. There is an expectation that they will behave well together.
I agree, but to be honest, that's the least of your problems with
front-end js stuff which changes every 5 minutes ;-)
Hi
bug:
/etc/make.conf has DEFAULT_VERSIONS += python=3.6,
but flavor ignore this setting.
reason:
When ${PYTHON_DEFAULT} == ${PYTHON3_DEFAULT},
skip adding ${PYTHON_DEFAULT} to ${FLAVORS},
so ${PYTHON2_DEFAULT} set to ${FLAVOR}.
On 2017/12/01 00:32, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
|Hi,|
|
|
|TL;DR:|
|
Hi!
> >For a very specific app I'm looking for a way to enable
> >Java support in firefox-esr -- does anyone know how to do this ?
> I advice you to try to install and use java/icedtea-web. It is web browser
> plugin which aim is to run Java applets. For me it works at least for part
> of applets
On Sat, 2 Dec 2017 at 2:36 am, Carmel NY wrote:
> > First, welcome flavors. It has been badly needed for a while and is
> going to
> > clean up a couple of messes that have been plaguing the port system for a
> > long time.
> >
> > Second, whither port msanagement tools? At least portmaster now a
pkg version -vL= shows both compat9x-amd64 and compat10x-amd64 as orphaned.
pkg info compat10x-amd64 shows "Origin : misc/compat10x"
ls -d /usr/ports/misc/compat10x says that the port is still there.
I can reinstall it with no errors, but pkg version still shows it as
orphaned.
Same is true
37 matches
Mail list logo
