Help update port 'mail/mlmmj' to the latest 1.3.0

2017-11-01 Thread Zhang Huangbin
Dear port maintainers, Could anyone help update port ‘mail/mlmmj’ to the latest 1.3.0 release? I did the update by simply changing version number in Makefile and it works. Thank you very much. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.fr

Firefox became much slower

2017-11-01 Thread Gleb Popov
Hello. I'm using Firefox on quite ancient machine (amd64, though) and after updating from firefox-56.0.1_3 to 56.0.2_3,1 it has become much more sluggish - whole UI hangs during page loading, scrolling isn't smooth anymore. Anyone also see this? ___ fre

Re: Help update port 'mail/mlmmj' to the latest 1.3.0

2017-11-01 Thread Zhang Huangbin
‎Hi Kurt, Thank you very much. :) ‎ Zhang Huangbin, founder of iRedMail project: http://www.iredmail.org/ Time zone: GMT+8 (China/Beijing). Available on Telegram: https://t.me/iredmail   Original Message   From: Kurt Jaeger Sent: Wednesday, November 1, 2017 5:24 PM To: Zhang Huangbin Cc: po..

[New PR] audio/amsynth

2017-11-01 Thread blubee blubeeme
can I have someone take a look at this bug report for a new port amsynth: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223361 also can someone please check the status of this other post as well archivers/zipios https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223176

Port adding NLS switch

2017-11-01 Thread blubee blubeeme
This is a portlint warning that I am getting for a port, how do I fix it? WARN: Makefile: Consider adding support for a NLS knob to conditionally disable gettext support. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listin

Re: deskutils/recoll

2017-11-01 Thread PeerCorps Trust Fund
Currently testing! This is wonderful news. On 10/31/2017 07:57 PM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi! Is there anyway that deskutils/recoll can be version bumped to 1.23.3 in ports? There have been a ton of bug fixes upstream for this and 1.21 has been in ports without a maintainer it seems. A patch fo

Re: Help update port 'mail/mlmmj' to the latest 1.3.0

2017-11-01 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > Could anyone help update port mail/mlmmj to the latest 1.3.0 > release? I did the update by simply changing version number in > Makefile and it works. Done. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 3 years to go ! ___

Re: Firefox became much slower

2017-11-01 Thread Baho Utot
On 11/01/17 02:07, Gleb Popov wrote: Hello. I'm using Firefox on quite ancient machine (amd64, though) and after updating from firefox-56.0.1_3 to 56.0.2_3,1 it has become much more sluggish - whole UI hangs during page loading, scrolling isn't smooth anymore. Anyone also see this? __

Re: Firefox became much slower

2017-11-01 Thread Guido Falsi
On 11/01/2017 12:15, Baho Utot wrote: > > > On 11/01/17 02:07, Gleb Popov wrote: >> Hello. >> >> I'm using Firefox on quite ancient machine (amd64, though) and after >> updating from firefox-56.0.1_3 to 56.0.2_3,1 it has become much more >> sluggish - whole UI hangs during page loading, scrolling

Re: Firefox became much slower

2017-11-01 Thread Baho Utot
On 11/01/17 07:40, Guido Falsi wrote: On 11/01/2017 12:15, Baho Utot wrote: On 11/01/17 02:07, Gleb Popov wrote: Hello. I'm using Firefox on quite ancient machine (amd64, though) and after updating from firefox-56.0.1_3 to 56.0.2_3,1 it has become much more sluggish - whole UI hangs during

Re: Firefox became much slower

2017-11-01 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On 01.11.2017 18:53, Baho Utot wrote: >> My personal suggestion is to use noscript, most sites work quite fine >> without javascript and even more sites work fine by allowing only a few >> origins, but blocking dozens of third party scripts. +1 > Noscript results in sites not working, ever try y

Re: Firefox became much slower

2017-11-01 Thread Stefan Esser
Am 01.11.17 um 12:40 schrieb Guido Falsi: > On 11/01/2017 12:15, Baho Utot wrote: >> >> >> On 11/01/17 02:07, Gleb Popov wrote: >>> Hello. >>> >>> I'm using Firefox on quite ancient machine (amd64, though) and after >>> updating from firefox-56.0.1_3 to 56.0.2_3,1 it has become much more >>> sluggi

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2017-11-01 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you

Re: Firefox became much slower

2017-11-01 Thread scratch65535
Yes. It's true under Windows, too. I keep having to kill the current process and reload. It's quite bad. On Wed, 1 Nov 2017 09:07:11 +0300, Gleb Popov <6year...@gmail.com> wrote: >I'm using Firefox on quite ancient machine (amd64, though) and after >updating from firefox-56.0.1_3 to 56.0.2_3,1

Re: Port adding NLS switch

2017-11-01 Thread Enrico Maria Crisostomo
With no further information, I suggest you have a look at: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/using-gettext.html The FreeBSD Porter's Handbook has an entire section about using gettext and making it optional. On 1 November 2017 at 11:09:59, blubeeme blubee (gurenc...@gmail.c

Porting message [set runtime path of...]

2017-11-01 Thread blubee blubeeme
I am creating a port and doing make it shows -- Set runtime path of "/usr/ports/lib.so" to "/usr/local/lib" Does that mean that I should set a symbolic link or is it just something that the port make system is doing automatically. Do I need to worry about it? If I do, how do I fix it? __

SOLIDWORKS using companies contacts

2017-11-01 Thread crystal . anita
lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif;background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-size:initial;background-repeat:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial">Hi,lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> style="b

Re: Firefox became much slower

2017-11-01 Thread Guido Falsi
On 11/01/2017 12:53, Baho Utot wrote: On 11/01/17 07:40, Guido Falsi wrote: On 11/01/2017 12:15, Baho Utot wrote: On 11/01/17 02:07, Gleb Popov wrote: Hello. I'm using Firefox on quite ancient machine (amd64, though) and after updating from firefox-56.0.1_3 to 56.0.2_3,1 it has become muc

Re: Firefox became much slower

2017-11-01 Thread Steve Kargl
On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 09:07:11AM +0300, Gleb Popov wrote: > > I'm using Firefox on quite ancient machine (amd64, though) and after > updating from firefox-56.0.1_3 to 56.0.2_3,1 it has become much more > sluggish - whole UI hangs during page loading, scrolling isn't smooth > anymore. > > Anyone

Re: Firefox became much slower

2017-11-01 Thread Andriy Gapon
On 01/11/2017 14:18, Stefan Esser wrote: > uMatrix has lots of pre-configured rules (blocks trackers and known > malware sites), but I'm using it in conjunction with uBlock from the > same developers. I used to use uBlock but at the time I got an impression that the addon itself ate away resources

Re: Firefox became much slower

2017-11-01 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 8:15 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote: > On 01/11/2017 14:18, Stefan Esser wrote: > > uMatrix has lots of pre-configured rules (blocks trackers and known > > malware sites), but I'm using it in conjunction with uBlock from the > > same developers. > > I used to use uBlock but at the

Re: Firefox became much slower

2017-11-01 Thread Gleb Popov
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 7:12 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 8:15 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > > On 01/11/2017 14:18, Stefan Esser wrote: > > > uMatrix has lots of pre-configured rules (blocks trackers and known > > > malware sites), but I'm using it in conjunction with uBlock fr

Re: Firefox became much slower

2017-11-01 Thread Dr. Nikolaus Klepp
Am Mittwoch, 1. November 2017 schrieb Gleb Popov: > On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 7:12 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 8:15 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > > > > On 01/11/2017 14:18, Stefan Esser wrote: > > > > uMatrix has lots of pre-configured rules (blocks trackers and known > > >

flexible ports

2017-11-01 Thread blubee blubeeme
There's this section in the porters handbook: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/porting-prefix.html this line of code just never seems to work I've tried not only on the ports that I am testing but many simpler ports all around the ports tree and they always fail because they'

Re: FireFox memory usage

2017-11-01 Thread Jan Beich
Jan Beich writes: > Andrea Venturoli writes: > >> Hello. >> >> I'm on 10.3/amd64 with firefox-esr 52.3.0. >> >> Since a few days my 4GiB desktop is crawling due to swap usage and >> looking at top, I see FireFox using almost 7GiB of RAM (SIZE column), >> 2.5 of which are "RES". > > Check about:m

Managed Service Providers Contact List

2017-11-01 Thread diann . jossy
style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,78,121)">Hi, style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,78,121)">Would you be interested in a list of Managed Service Providers (MSPs) and Cloud Service Providers (CSPs)? style="font-size:11pt;font-family

autoreconf not found

2017-11-01 Thread blubee blubeeme
I'm test building in a jail but I keep getting this error: /bin/sh: /usr/local/bin/autoreconf: not found *** Error code 127 I have USES= autoreconf but the dependency still isn't being brought in. What else do I need to do get get autoreconf to get installed by the port? _

Flavor or not for this port?

2017-11-01 Thread L.Bartoletti
Hi, I want to take x11-toolkits/qwt{5,6}-* Both are built for Qt4. I especially need qwt6 for Qt5. Since we have flavors. Is it better to add a Qt5 flavor for Qwt6 or simply add a x11-toolkits/qwt6-qt5 (like security/qtkeychain-qt{4,5} ?) Thanks. Regards. Loïc

Re: Flavor or not for this port?

2017-11-01 Thread Rainer Hurling
Am 02.11.2017 um 07:13 schrieb L.Bartoletti: Hi, I want to take x11-toolkits/qwt{5,6}-* Both are built for Qt4. I especially need qwt6 for Qt5. Since we have flavors. Is it better to add a Qt5 flavor for Qwt6 or simply add a x11-toolkits/qwt6-qt5 (like security/qtkeychain-qt{4,5} ?) Thanks.