On 10/04/17 07:59, Johan Ström wrote:
Hi,
thanks, verified and seems to work fine, at least on unplug/re-plug.
I added a "logger "logger ATTACH event on $cdev;" to the action too. On
unplug-plug scenario this was logged and all worked fine [1].
On a reboot it did not log it [2], but it actually
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
Ah, okay. Well, it works now and didn't work with the old devd rule, I'm happy
with that :)
Shall I create a patch and submit to bugzilla, or are you fixing this as part
of bigger cleanup?
On October 4, 2017 10:03:21 AM GMT+02:00, Hans Petter Selasky
wrote:
>On 10/04/17 07:59, Johan Ström wr
On 10/04/17 16:30, Johan Ström wrote:
Ah, okay. Well, it works now and didn't work with the old devd rule, I'm happy
with that :)
Shall I create a patch and submit to bugzilla, or are you fixing this as part
of bigger cleanup?
Please submit it straight to ports. No more cleanup from my side
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Hi,
I'm doing tech edits on the new edition of "Absolute FreeBSD," and
stumbled into what's apparently a delicate topic.
Some of my reviewers are happy I included portmaster in the book.
Some reviewers beg me not to include it.
Unfortunately, people will be reading af3e and considering it
defin
On 10/04/17 12:16, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm doing tech edits on the new edition of "Absolute FreeBSD," and
> stumbled into what's apparently a delicate topic.
>
> Some of my reviewers are happy I included portmaster in the book.
>
> Some reviewers beg me not to include it. [...]
It
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 12:16:49PM -0400, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
>
> Poudriere really needs its own small book. Yes, you can do simple
> poudriere installs, but once you start covering it properly the docs
> quickly expand. My notes alone are longer than my af3e chapter
> limits. (I'll probably p
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Steve Kargl <
s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 12:16:49PM -0400, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
> >
> > Poudriere really needs its own small book. Yes, you can do simple
> > poudriere installs, but once you start covering it properly the
Hello there,
When it comes to B2B marketing, the effectiveness of your campaign is almost
entirely dependent on the quality of your leads. An unreliable set of leads
will undoubtedly result in unreliable and possibly disastrous results.
At Microiworld we provide consistent lead generation s
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 10:21:26AM -0700, Freddie Cash wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Steve Kargl <
> s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 12:16:49PM -0400, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
> > >
> > > Poudriere really needs its own small book. Yes, you can do
On 10/04/17 14:14, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 10:21:26AM -0700, Freddie Cash wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Steve Kargl <
>> s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 12:16:49PM -0400, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
Poudriere really ne
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 02:57:08PM -0400, George Mitchell wrote:
> On 10/04/17 14:14, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 10:21:26AM -0700, Freddie Cash wrote:
> >> On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Steve Kargl <
> >> s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Wed, Oct 04, 20
On 04/10/2017 16:16, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
Hi,
I'm doing tech edits on the new edition of "Absolute FreeBSD," and
stumbled into what's apparently a delicate topic.
Some of my reviewers are happy I included portmaster in the book.
Some reviewers beg me not to include it.
Unfortunately, peop
On 04/10/2017 19:40, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 02:57:08PM -0400, George Mitchell wrote:
On 10/04/17 14:14, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 10:21:26AM -0700, Freddie Cash wrote:
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Steve Kargl <
s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
Michael W. Lucas wrote:
Hi,
I'm doing tech edits on the new edition of "Absolute FreeBSD," and
stumbled into what's apparently a delicate topic.
Some of my reviewers are happy I included portmaster in the book.
Some reviewers beg me not to include it.
Unfortunately, people will be reading af3
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 08:13:16PM +, Grzegorz Junka wrote:
> I was trying
> to compile with the system that was being updated at the
> same time - this can't possibly work (or can it?).
It works somewhere between "quite often" to "nearly all
the time". It can vary depending on the complexity
On 04/10/2017 20:43, Mark Linimon wrote:
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 08:13:16PM +, Grzegorz Junka wrote:
I was trying
to compile with the system that was being updated at the
same time - this can't possibly work (or can it?).
It works somewhere between "quite often" to "nearly all
the time".
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 04:39:25PM -0400, Ernie Luzar wrote:
> even the native ports system usage on personal machines
> wwill fade away.
I have seen this claim many times by users but AFAIR that
was never a goal. The feeling was that _most_ users would
migrate to using packages, once using packa
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 08:56:00PM +, Grzegorz Junka wrote:
> Maybe I am just too ambitious or maybe poudriere is more
> idiot-proof?
My possibly incorrect understanding is that poudriere
trades off doing a lot more work in an attempt to produce
more rigorously correct results.
mcl
__
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Grzegorz Junka wrote:
>
> On 04/10/2017 20:43, Mark Linimon wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 08:13:16PM +, Grzegorz Junka wrote:
>>
>>> I was trying
>>> to compile with the system that was being updated at the
>>> same time - this can't possibly work (or can
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 08:30:49PM +, Grzegorz Junka wrote:
>
> On 04/10/2017 19:40, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > Ahem, yeah, so I'm not allowed to request a short description
> > on how to use poudiere in a resource constrained environment?
> >
>
> The environment isn't constrained by poudriere bu
On 04/10/2017 21:22, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 08:30:49PM +, Grzegorz Junka wrote:
On 04/10/2017 19:40, Steve Kargl wrote:
Ahem, yeah, so I'm not allowed to request a short description
on how to use poudiere in a resource constrained environment?
The environment isn't co
On 04/10/2017 21:00, Mark Linimon wrote:
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 08:56:00PM +, Grzegorz Junka wrote:
Maybe I am just too ambitious or maybe poudriere is more
idiot-proof?
My possibly incorrect understanding is that poudriere
trades off doing a lot more work in an attempt to produce
more ri
Please understand that I'm not trying to be obstinate,
I'm trying to understand.
Background: years ago I managed the cluster of i386 blades
that we used in package building. 933MHz and 512MB IIRC.
So I am familiar with constraint problems.
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 02:22:25PM -0700, Steve Kargl wr
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 09:56:53PM +, Grzegorz Junka wrote:
> portmaster/portupgrade trade off doing less work with
> less resources in an attempt to produce less rigorously
> correct result
That was what I thought I said :-) or at least was trying
to say.
mcl
___
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 05:29:14PM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote:
> Please understand that I'm not trying to be obstinate,
> I'm trying to understand.
Me too.
> Background: years ago I managed the cluster of i386 blades
> that we used in package building. 933MHz and 512MB IIRC.
> So I am familiar wi
On 4 Oct, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 05:29:14PM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote:
>> Please understand that I'm not trying to be obstinate,
>> I'm trying to understand.
>
> Me too.
>
>> Background: years ago I managed the cluster of i386 blades
>> that we used in package building. 93
> On 4 Oct, 2017, at 10:16, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm doing tech edits on the new edition of "Absolute FreeBSD," and
> stumbled into what's apparently a delicate topic.
>
> Some of my reviewers are happy I included portmaster in the book.
>
> Some reviewers beg me not to include
Interesting thread, I've learned more about FreeBSD build here than almost
anywhere else.
Thanks OP for the email.
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017, 09:14 Adam Weinberger wrote:
> > On 4 Oct, 2017, at 10:16, Michael W. Lucas
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm doing tech edits on the new edition of "Absolute
30 matches
Mail list logo
