On 2017-09-27 08:29, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 27/09/2017 07:11, Julian Elischer wrote:
>> Is there a document/paper on what this is and what it's limits are etc?
>
> https://wiki.freebsd.org/Ports/FlavorsAndSubPackages
> https://wiki.freebsd.org/Ports/FlavorsMigration
>
These pages don't con
Am 26.09.17 um 08:21 schrieb Kubilay Kocak:
> In section:
>
> 4.4. Patching
>
> - Add new section (at/numbered 4.4.2)
> - Name: Automatic Patch Generation
> - Renumber sections (4.4.2 -> 4.4.3)
>
> Text:
>
> The ports framework provides a {{{makepatch}} target, which when run,
> automatically
On 27/09/2017 08:09, Tilman Keskinöz wrote:
>
>
> On 2017-09-27 08:29, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>> On 27/09/2017 07:11, Julian Elischer wrote:
>>> Is there a document/paper on what this is and what it's limits are etc?
>>
>> https://wiki.freebsd.org/Ports/FlavorsAndSubPackages
>> https://wiki.freebs
On 09/27, Tilman Keskinöz wrote:
>
>
> On 2017-09-27 08:29, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> > On 27/09/2017 07:11, Julian Elischer wrote:
> >> Is there a document/paper on what this is and what it's limits are etc?
> >
> > https://wiki.freebsd.org/Ports/FlavorsAndSubPackages
> > https://wiki.freebsd.org
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
On 27/9/17 4:20 pm, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Before this gets too far down the road I would like to suggest that we
quickly formalise some nomenclature
or we will have 200 different ideas as to how to do the same thing;
I would like to propose the following possible "examples of official"
flavou
On 27/9/17 4:48 pm, Kirill Ponomarev via freebsd-ports wrote:
On 09/27, Tilman Keskinöz wrote:
On 2017-09-27 08:29, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 27/09/2017 07:11, Julian Elischer wrote:
Is there a document/paper on what this is and what it's limits are etc?
https://wiki.freebsd.org/Ports/Flavors
On 09/27/2017 10:20, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Currently the idea is to work on the python ports in the tree so we'd
have both python-2.7 and python-3.6 versions built and available in the
repos. That's just the initial target to debug and bed-in the FLAVORS
stuff.
Same applies for php56 vs php70
On 26/9/17 10:07 pm, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Julian Elischer writes:
SO imagine that I needed to be ab;e to reproduce the pkg repo as of a
articular day, is there anywhere one can look to see the svn revision
number that corresponds to teh current pkg files.
I would like to take a snapshot at
Am 27.09.17 um 13:52 schrieb Julian Elischer:
> On 27/9/17 4:20 pm, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>
> Before this gets too far down the road I would like to suggest that we
> quickly formalise some nomenclature
> or we will have 200 different ideas as to how to do the same thing;
>
> I would like to prop
Am 26.09.17 um 16:05 schrieb Mathieu Arnold:
> Hi,
>
> **Do not commit FLAVORS to any ports, a hook will prevent it, that being
> said, do try it and test what can be done.**
>
> To test this feature in poudriere, you need
> poudriere-devel-3.1.99.20170621 or later.
>
> This has been a long awai
On 27/9/17 8:17 pm, Stefan Esser wrote:
Am 27.09.17 um 13:52 schrieb Julian Elischer:
On 27/9/17 4:20 pm, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Before this gets too far down the road I would like to suggest that we
quickly formalise some nomenclature
or we will have 200 different ideas as to how to do the same
On 09/27/2017 15:24, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 27/9/17 8:17 pm, Stefan Esser wrote:
>> Am 27.09.17 um 13:52 schrieb Julian Elischer:
>>> On 27/9/17 4:20 pm, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>>>
>>> Before this gets too far down the road I would like to suggest that we
>>> quickly formalise some nomenclature
Le 27/09/2017 à 15:24, Julian Elischer a écrit :
> On 27/9/17 8:17 pm, Stefan Esser wrote:
>> Am 27.09.17 um 13:52 schrieb Julian Elischer:
>>> On 27/9/17 4:20 pm, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>>>
>>> Before this gets too far down the road I would like to suggest that we
>>> quickly formalise some nomencl
I'm running a 10.3-RELEASE instance. I ran portmaster -ad in screen
yesterday to get all the ports up to date. Today I ran it again, to make
sure everything was updated.
When I did, I got this error:
portmaster -ad
===>>> Gathering distinfo list for installed ports
===>>> Starting check of in
On 27-9-2017 17:22, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> I'm running a 10.3-RELEASE instance. I ran portmaster -ad in screen yesterday
> to get all the ports up to date. Today I ran it again, to make sure
> everything was updated. > > When I did, I got this error: > > portmaster -ad
> > ===>>> Gathering
distin
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:22 AM, Paul Schmehl
wrote:
> I'm running a 10.3-RELEASE instance. I ran portmaster -ad in screen
> yesterday to get all the ports up to date. Today I ran it again, to make
> sure everything was updated.
>
> When I did, I got this error:
>
> portmaster -ad
> ===>>> Gathe
Quoting Stefan Esser (from Wed, 27 Sep 2017 14:35:24 +0200):
Am 26.09.17 um 16:05 schrieb Mathieu Arnold:
Hi,
**Do not commit FLAVORS to any ports, a hook will prevent it, that being
said, do try it and test what can be done.**
To test this feature in poudriere, you need
poudriere-devel-3.1
On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 21:24:22 +0800 Julian Elischer wrote
> On 27/9/17 8:17 pm, Stefan Esser wrote:
> > Am 27.09.17 um 13:52 schrieb Julian Elischer:
> >> On 27/9/17 4:20 pm, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> >>
> >> Before this gets too far down the road I would like to suggest that we
> >> quickly formali
On 27 Sep, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 27/9/17 4:20 pm, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>
> Before this gets too far down the road I would like to suggest that we
> quickly formalise some nomenclature
> or we will have 200 different ideas as to how to do the same thing;
>
> I would like to propose the fol
Tomas and Karel from MSFT have some updates for us, in short, the
full-scale battle can start and volunteers are needed.
- FreeBSD: implement System.Diagnostic.Process:
https://github.com/dotnet/corefx/issues/24292
- FreeBSD: System.Console is not working right:
https://github.com/dotnet/corefx/is
Errors all seem to be similar, of the form ..
-- sqbaselib.lo ---
depbase=`echo sqbaselib.lo | sed 's|[^/]*$|.deps/&|;s|\.lo$||'`; /bin/sh
../../../../libtool --tag=CXX--mode=compile c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
-I. -I../../../../src/include
-I../../../../src/include/scripting/include
-I../../../
Michael Butler writes:
> --- sqvm.lo ---
> In file included from sqvm.cpp:5:
> In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/math.h:310:
> /usr/include/c++/v1/limits:148:85: error: expected expression
> _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY static _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR type min()
> _NOEXCEPT {return type();}
>
>
On 24/9/17 5:58 am, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 23 Sep 2017, at 23:42, Julian Elischer wrote:
Trying to compile the emulators/open-vm-tools-nox11 port
but I end up dying with:
libtool: compile: cc -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"open-vm-tools\" -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"open-vm-tools\" -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"10.1.5\"
+1
I threw some comments on the open issues.
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Geoffrey Huntley wrote:
> Tomas and Karel from MSFT have some updates for us, in short, the full-scale
> battle can start and volunteers are needed.
>
> - FreeBSD: implement System.Diagnostic.Process:
> https://github.c
Am 27.09.17 um 22:57 schrieb Don Lewis:
> If at some point you run into a bug and need the debug files, you can
> pkg install the debug files for whatever packages that you need without
> disturbing your already installed runtime files, and then you can later
> deinstall the debug files when you ar
26 matches
Mail list logo
