Re: The future of portmaster

2017-05-30 Thread rollingbits (Lucas)
On Feb 22, 2017 11:36 AM, "rollingbits (Luc wrote: On Feb 19, 2017 12:13 PM, "Matthias Andree" wrote: Am 17.02.2017 um 08:37 schrieb abi: > From my point of view, jails are overkill. Chroot should be enough and > it would be nice if portmaster starts building in clean environment. Please use po

Re: The future of portmaster

2017-05-30 Thread rollingbits (Lucas)
On Feb 22, 2017 11:36 AM, "rollingbits (Lucas)" wrote: On Feb 19, 2017 12:13 PM, "Matthias Andree" wrote: Am 17.02.2017 um 08:37 schrieb abi: > From my point of view, jails are overkill. Chroot should be enough and > it would be nice if portmaster starts building in clean environment. Please u

Re: The future of portmaster

2017-05-30 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
>when portmaster have gone away? What? WHAT? portmaster going away??? I hope not Anton ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@free

Re: The future of portmaster

2017-05-30 Thread Adam Weinberger
> On 30 May, 2017, at 7:51, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > >> when portmaster have gone away? > > What? WHAT? > > portmaster going away??? > > I hope not > > Anton The ports tree continues to evolve. Major new features are planned and in the process of being implemented. These changes will bre

Re: The future of portmaster

2017-05-30 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
>From ad...@adamw.org Tue May 30 15:03:31 2017 > >The ports tree continues to evolve. Major new features are planned and in the >process of being implemented. These changes will break all the port-building >tools. oy vei >poudriere and synth are actively developed, so they will quickly support

Re: The future of portmaster

2017-05-30 Thread Adam Weinberger
> On 30 May, 2017, at 8:15, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > >> From ad...@adamw.org Tue May 30 15:03:31 2017 >> >> The ports tree continues to evolve. Major new features are planned and in >> the process of being implemented. These changes will break all the >> port-building tools. > > oy vei >

Re: The future of portmaster

2017-05-30 Thread Jeffrey Bouquet via freebsd-ports
tl/dr at bottom, repeated here, flowchart please On Tue, 5/30/17, Adam Weinberger wrote: Subject: Re: The future of portmaster To: me...@bris.ac.uk Cc: rollingb...@gmail.com, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Tuesday, May 30, 2017, 7:30 AM > On

Re: The future of portmaster

2017-05-30 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 7:15 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > >From ad...@adamw.org Tue May 30 15:03:31 2017 > > > >The ports tree continues to evolve. Major new features are planned and in > the process of being implemented. These changes will break all the > port-building tools. > > oy vei > > >

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2017-05-30 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you

gcc5 not building on 11-0-RELEASE

2017-05-30 Thread Fernando Herrero Carrón
Hi everyone: I am trying to build lang/gcc5 using Poudriere from ports tree just updated a couple of hours ago. The port fails to link with: /usr/local/bin/ld: /wrkdirs/usr/ports/lang/gcc5/work/.build/./gcc/liblto_plugin.so: error loading plugin: Service unavailable My port options are: ---Beg

Re: The future of portmaster

2017-05-30 Thread Thomas Mueller
> The ports tree continues to evolve. Major new features are planned and in the > process of being implemented. These changes will break all the port-building > tools. > poudriere and synth are actively developed, so they will quickly support the > new changes. portmaster and portupgra

Re: The future of portmaster

2017-05-30 Thread Peter Beckman
On Tue, 30 May 2017, Adam Weinberger wrote: You don't need separate port trees. The idea is to use poudriere to build ALL your ports. Just make a list of the ports you want, pass it to poudriere, and it will keep everything up-to-date, rebuild things when they need to be rebuilt, and give you a

Re: The future of portmaster

2017-05-30 Thread Adam Weinberger
> On 30 May, 2017, at 11:37, Peter Beckman wrote: > > On Tue, 30 May 2017, Adam Weinberger wrote: > >> You don't need separate port trees. The idea is to use poudriere to build >> ALL your ports. Just make a list of the ports you want, pass it to >> poudriere, and it will keep everything up-to-d

Re: gcc5 not building on 11-0-RELEASE

2017-05-30 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 30 May 2017, at 19:19, Fernando Herrero Carrón wrote: > > Hi everyone: > > I am trying to build lang/gcc5 using Poudriere from ports tree just updated > a couple of hours ago. > > The port fails to link with: > > /usr/local/bin/ld: > /wrkdirs/usr/ports/lang/gcc5/work/.build/./gcc/liblto_plu

RE: The future of portmaster [and of ports-mgmt/synth]

2017-05-30 Thread Mark Millard
Adam Weinberger adamw at adamw.org wrote on Tue May 30 14:00:21 UTC 2017: > poudriere and synth are actively developed Kevin Oberman rkoberman at gmail.com wrote on Tue May 30 16:52:19 UTC 2017 > I really suggest that you look at synth. ports-mgmt/synth depends on lang/gcc6-aux which has lost i

[t...@iki.fi: v2.2.30 released]

2017-05-30 Thread The Doctor
Heads up! - Forwarded message from Timo Sirainen - Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 21:16:31 +0300 From: Timo Sirainen To: dovecot-n...@dovecot.org, Dovecot Mailing List Subject: v2.2.30 released X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.30.tar.gz https://doveco

Re: The future of portmaster [and of ports-mgmt/synth]

2017-05-30 Thread Mark Linimon
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 12:00:14PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > Kevin Oberman rkoberman at gmail.com wrote on Tue May 30 16:52:19 UTC 2017 > > > I really suggest that you look at synth. synth is currently only available for x86 and unless someone steps up to do the work to make the Ada compilers

Re: texinfo build failure

2017-05-30 Thread Michael Butler
Anyone care to address this? On 5/26/17 2:41 PM, Michael Butler wrote: Is anyone else seeing this failure to build texinfo on -CURRENT? cd doc && gmake TEXMF=/usr/local/share/texmf install-tex gmake[3]: Entering directory '/usr/ports/print/texinfo/work/texinfo-6.3/doc' test -n "/usr/local/shar

Re: The future of portmaster

2017-05-30 Thread Thomas Mueller
One thing I forgot to mention in my last post is that the UPDATING file looks geared to portmaster and portupgrade. Users are thus led to believe that portupgrade and portmaster are still the currently recommended tools. If the ports people want to get users to switch to synth or poudriere, up

Re: The future of portmaster

2017-05-30 Thread Adam Weinberger
> On 30 May, 2017, at 14:19, Thomas Mueller wrote: > > > One thing I forgot to mention in my last post is that the UPDATING file looks > geared to portmaster and portupgrade. > > Users are thus led to believe that portupgrade and portmaster are still the > currently recommended tools. > > If

Owncloud upgrade failure

2017-05-30 Thread David Marec
Hi, After updating owncloud from the early 10.0.1 package, the upgrading process failed on the following: root:/<1>local/www/owncloud#sudo -u www php occ upgrade The process control (PCNTL) extensions are required in case you want to interrupt long running commands - see http://php.net/manua

Re: The future of portmaster

2017-05-30 Thread Jim Ohlstein
On Tue, 2017-05-30 at 14:25 -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote: > > On 30 May, 2017, at 14:19, Thomas Mueller > > wrote: > > > > > > One thing I forgot to mention in my last post is that the UPDATING > > file looks geared to portmaster and portupgrade. > > > > Users are thus led to believe that portu

Re: [t...@iki.fi: v2.2.30 released]

2017-05-30 Thread Jim Ohlstein
On Tue, 2017-05-30 at 14:02 -0600, The Doctor wrote: > Heads up! How about submitting a patch for the upgrade? That would be helpful. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ > > - Forwarded message from Timo Sirainen - > > Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 21:16:31 +0300 > From: Timo Sirainen > To:

Re: [t...@iki.fi: v2.2.30 released]

2017-05-30 Thread Larry Rosenman
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 04:53:23PM -0400, Jim Ohlstein wrote: > On Tue, 2017-05-30 at 14:02 -0600, The Doctor wrote: > > Heads up! > > How about submitting a patch for the upgrade? That would be helpful. > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ > Adam Weinberger (Maintainer) already updated the po

Re: The future of portmaster [and of ports-mgmt/synth]

2017-05-30 Thread Ed Maste
On 30 May 2017 at 15:00, Mark Millard wrote: > > ports-mgmt/synth depends on lang/gcc6-aux For reference, I've created PR 219667 to track the lang/gcc6-aux issue. The pre-built bootstrap compilers need to be recreated I believe, with a trick similar to the one used for lang/ghc. _

Re: Owncloud upgrade failure

2017-05-30 Thread David Marec
Le 30.05.2017 à 22:29, David Marec a écrit : CREATE TABLE oc_account_terms (id BIGINT UNSIGNED AUTO_INCREMENT NOT NULL, account_id BIGINT UNSIGNED NOT NULL, term VARCHAR(256) NOT NULL, INDEX account_id_index (account_id), INDEX term_index (term), PRIMARY KEY(id)) DEFAULT CHARACTER SET utf8 COLL

Re: The future of portmaster [and of ports-mgmt/synth]

2017-05-30 Thread Per olof Ljungmark
On 2017-05-30 22:06, Mark Linimon wrote: On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 12:00:14PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: Kevin Oberman rkoberman at gmail.com wrote on Tue May 30 16:52:19 UTC 2017 I really suggest that you look at synth. synth is currently only available for x86 and unless someone steps up to

Re: The future of portmaster [and of ports-mgmt/synth]

2017-05-30 Thread Mark Linimon
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 11:46:46PM +0200, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > Hello, I have not followed this thread before but just wanted to say > that I use portmaster extensively, it works for us and I would miss > it if it went. Are there actually plans to retire it? To reiterate the status: * som

Re: Owncloud upgrade failure

2017-05-30 Thread David Marec
Le 30.05.2017 à 22:29, David Marec a écrit : Doctrine\DBAL\Exception\DriverException: An exception occurred while executing 'CREATE TABLE oc_account_terms (id BIGINT UNSIGNED AUTO_INCREMENT NOT NULL, account_id BIGINT UNSIGNED NOT NULL, term VARCHAR(256) NOT NULL, INDEX account_id_index (acco

Re: The future of portmaster [and of ports-mgmt/synth]

2017-05-30 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 11:46:46PM +0200, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > > Hello, I have not followed this thread before but just wanted to say > > that I use portmaster extensively, it works for us and I would miss > > it if it went. Are there

Bug 218703 for graphics/blender has patches that should be commited

2017-05-30 Thread Erik Nordstrøm
Hello, Bug 218703 for graphics/blender has patches which fixes a known problem. However graphics/blender does not have a maintainer, so no-one has commited the patches. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218703 Please commit said patches, thanks :) Erik Nordstrøm ___

Re: The future of portmaster [and of ports-mgmt/synth]

2017-05-30 Thread Mark Millard
On 2017-May-30, at 1:06 PM, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 12:00:14PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: >> Kevin Oberman rkoberman at gmail.com wrote on Tue May 30 16:52:19 UTC 2017 >> >>> I really suggest that you look at synth. > > synth is currently only available for x86 and unless