Re: chromium-58.0.3029.110_1 fails to build with cllang40

2017-05-21 Thread Matthias Apitz
On Sunday, 21 May 2017 08:57:56 CEST, Jan Beich wrote: Looks like https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217948 Thanks. I will update my poudriere oven to head of base and create a new jail for this ports tree. Btw, www/chromium was the only port of ~2000, apart of fetch fails,

Re: 64-bit inodes (ino64) Status Update and Call for Testing

2017-05-21 Thread Jilles Tjoelker
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 10:43:14PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > Inodes are data structures corresponding to objects in a file system, > such as files and directories. FreeBSD has historically used 32-bit > values to identify inodes, which limits file systems to somewhat under > 2^32 objects.

Re: 64-bit inodes (ino64) Status Update and Call for Testing

2017-05-21 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 02:14:56PM +0200, Jilles Tjoelker wrote: > We have another type in this area which is too small in some situations: > uint8_t for struct dirent.d_namlen. For filesystems that store filenames > as upto 255 UTF-16 code units, the name to be stored in d_name may be > upto 765 b

Re: 64-bit inodes (ino64) Status Update and Call for Testing

2017-05-21 Thread Jilles Tjoelker
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 03:31:18PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 02:14:56PM +0200, Jilles Tjoelker wrote: > > We have another type in this area which is too small in some situations: > > uint8_t for struct dirent.d_namlen. For filesystems that store filenames > > as up

Re: 64-bit inodes (ino64) Status Update and Call for Testing

2017-05-21 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 04:03:55PM +0200, Jilles Tjoelker wrote: > On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 03:31:18PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 02:14:56PM +0200, Jilles Tjoelker wrote: > > > We have another type in this area which is too small in some situations: > > > uint8_t f

pango not building under portmaster, holds back emacs (portmaster)

2017-05-21 Thread Lowell Gilbert
I suspect this is a portmaster problem, but pango isn't building with X support because of: ../pango/pangoxft-render.h:31:10: fatal error: 'X11/Xft/Xft.h' file not found This is only the current issue. I've been struggling for several days to get my graphics programs rebuilt, and I haven't seen an

Re: 64-bit inodes (ino64) Status Update and Call for Testing

2017-05-21 Thread Jilles Tjoelker
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 05:25:35PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 04:03:55PM +0200, Jilles Tjoelker wrote: > > On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 03:31:18PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 02:14:56PM +0200, Jilles Tjoelker wrote: > > > > We have ano

Re: pango not building under portmaster, holds back emacs (portmaster)

2017-05-21 Thread David Wolfskill
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 04:55:57PM -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > I suspect this is a portmaster problem, but pango isn't building with X > support because of: > ../pango/pangoxft-render.h:31:10: fatal error: 'X11/Xft/Xft.h' file not found > > This is only the current issue. I've been struggling f

Re: chromium-58.0.3029.110_1 fails to build with cllang40

2017-05-21 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día domingo, mayo 21, 2017 a las 11:53:34a. m. +0200, Matthias Apitz escribió: > On Sunday, 21 May 2017 08:57:56 CEST, Jan Beich wrote: > > > Looks like https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217948 > > > > Thanks. I will update my poudriere oven to head of base and create a new

Invitatie la dezvoltare - programele de training din perioada urmatoare

2017-05-21 Thread Dynamic Training Solutions
| ![](http://nl.training-info.ro/AoqytoYh4qTIOBMKCtC8OQkjRSWgM-7mrmIxKxg8zTKp_RCllOBCL57FF3odaQjyZ4L6-6cPvGfoCZjktpMn0z8J7E4gYrGT6sBD09JA1n72I_U1Ku-5phZGJ5rhvlRG2Duro3LOLc1JFZyv_KuBAJedZq4AG14BTm8EHIUHbAcEWsz372ug0aiJy04LZOzAcDtMn1hOrMudzuyGxVyrOUjN-MbKHV-FC2StvvqTJy6EgfLZb9A6epfncmBd_D6kuwAJ3e7sQ