FYI: amd64 built with WITH_LLD_IS_LD= vs. devel/libunwind : cannot preempt symbol (for various symbols)

Context: amd64 FreeBSD -r316952 as a VirtualBox guest that was built using WITH_LLD_IS_LD= . ports -r438577. x11/xorg-minimal indirectly gets to devel/libunwind and devel/libunwind fails to build from source: --- Lperf-simple --- libtool: link: cc -O2 -pipe -g -fstack-protector -fno-strict-alias

Re: lang/gcc6-aux for head beyond __nonnull related issues: vm_ooffset_t and vm_pindex_t related changes (and more) [amd64 system ld being lld vs. binutils based]

On 2017-Apr-15, at 11:30 PM, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2017-Apr-15, at 2:30 AM, Mark Linimon wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 08:27:29PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: >>> I've seen material quoted from a exp-run that reported >>> that about 54(?) ports were then blocked by lang/gcc6-aux >>> not

Re: FYI: amd64 built with WITH_LLD_IS_LD= vs. devel/libunwind : cannot preempt symbol (for various symbols)

On 2017-Apr-16, at 1:10 AM, Mark Millard wrote: > Context: amd64 FreeBSD -r316952 as a VirtualBox guest > that was built using WITH_LLD_IS_LD= . ports -r438577. > > x11/xorg-minimal indirectly gets to devel/libunwind and > devel/libunwind fails to build from source: > > > --- Lperf-simple ---

Re: default named.conf in bind ports and slaving from f-root

On 04/16/2017 04:02 AM, George Mitchell wrote: On 04/14/17 08:37, Thomas Steen Rasmussen wrote: Hello, Cloudflare deployed a bunch (74 apparently) of new f-root dns servers, which do not permit AXFR like the other f-root instances do. [...] A good alternative could be to change named.conf to us

Re: default named.conf in bind ports and slaving from f-root

On 04/16/17 05:30, Thomas Steen Rasmussen wrote: > On 04/16/2017 04:02 AM, George Mitchell wrote: >> On 04/14/17 08:37, Thomas Steen Rasmussen wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> Cloudflare deployed a bunch (74 apparently) of new f-root dns >>> servers, which do not permit AXFR like the other f-root instance

slurm-wlm pre-install failed

The pre-install of slurm-wlm script failed when upgrading 800 or so ports with pkg. But pkg first de-installed hundreds of ports for the upgrade which are now not installed. Two questions: 1. Is there a way of continuing with the upgrade without having to manually install all the ports that ha

Need for commit (new port)

Hi, Everyone! May some kind committer commit the new port: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215708 It is a port for the Payara Application Service (http://www.payara.fish/) which is derived from the Glassfish (https://glassfish.java.net/). -- Dmytro Bilokha dmy...@posteo.net _

Re: RELRO breaks net/openmpi, was: net/openmpi fails to compile with default settings

>The compilation was broken because of > >OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=RELRO > >in > >devel/binutils > >After disabling RELRO net/openmpi can be compiled successfully. Not sure >if this is a bug or expected behaviour. I'm glad you nailed it. I've no idea what this option does. Anton ___

amd64 head -r317015 system clang 4.0 crashes during qt5-widgets "checking" activity: "Wrong prefetch hint in intrinsic: should be 0 or 1" (avx512.cpp)

[ports -r438577 with devel/*binutils reverted to 2.27 via -r436731 .] The qr5-widgets build attempt reported: checking for avx512cd... clang++ -c -pipe -O2 -g -fstack-protector -fno-strict-aliasing -mavx512cd -g -Wall -W -fPIC -DAVX512WANT=CD -I. -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/lib/qt5/mkspe

Re: Need for commit (new port)

Hi! > May some kind committer commit the new port: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215708 > > It is a port for the Payara Application Service (http://www.payara.fish/) > which is derived from the Glassfish (https://glassfish.java.net/). Done. May I ask about the difference be

amd64 head -r317015 system ports -r438577 : qt5-widgets vs. libQt5Core.so "multiple definition of" for: __bss_start@Qt_5 _edata@Qt_5 _end@Qt_5

[This is indirectly from an attempt to build x11/lumina . context: head -r317015 ports -4438577 with devel/*binutils reverted to 2.27 via -r436731 .] The qt5-widgets build stops with: --- ../../../bin/uic --- c++ -Wl,--as-needed -fstack-protector -Wl,--gc-sections -pthread -Wl,-rpath,/usr/loca

Maintainer Update apache-solr

Dear all, I search for a committer for this two reports: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218523 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218654 Thanks! Gruß Matthias -- "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better id

Need commit of simple port update

Hello ports list; May some kind committor please commit my simple port update: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218272 Thanks ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsub

Re: FYI: amd64 built with WITH_LLD_IS_LD= vs. devel/libunwind : cannot preempt symbol (for various symbols)

On 16 April 2017 at 04:10, Mark Millard wrote: > Context: amd64 FreeBSD -r316952 as a VirtualBox guest > that was built using WITH_LLD_IS_LD= . ports -r438577. > > x11/xorg-minimal indirectly gets to devel/libunwind and > devel/libunwind fails to build from source: > > > --- Lperf-simple --- > lib

Re: Need for commit (new port)

On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 10:11:07PM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi! May some kind committer commit the new port: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215708 It is a port for the Payara Application Service (http://www.payara.fish/) which is derived from the Glassfish (https://glassfis

Re: FYI: amd64 built with WITH_LLD_IS_LD= vs. devel/libunwind : cannot preempt symbol (for various symbols)

On 2017-Apr-16, at 7:01 PM, Ed Maste wrote: > On 16 April 2017 at 04:10, Mark Millard wrote: >> Context: amd64 FreeBSD -r316952 as a VirtualBox guest >> that was built using WITH_LLD_IS_LD= . ports -r438577. >> >> x11/xorg-minimal indirectly gets to devel/libunwind and >> devel/libunwind fails