INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-10 - please wait..--- describe.accessibility ---
--- describe.arabic ---
--- describe.archivers ---
--- describe.astro ---
--- describe.audio ---
--- describe.benchmarks ---
--- describe.biology ---
--- describe.cad ---
--- describe.chinese ---
--- d
John Baldwin writes:
> I wouldn't even mind if we had both /usr/local/man and /usr/local/share/man
> so long as our default MANPATH included both if that means applying fewer
> patches to ports.
The default MANPATH is constructed dynamically from PATH:
1. From each component of the user's
On Thu, 9 Mar 2017 19:43:05 -0600 Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 12:35:32PM +0100, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
>> Note that -rpath /usr/local/lib isn't added by gcc but by libtool
>> because it assumes rtld will not search that directory automatically.
>> If you run './configure CC=gcc
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
I have an old web server (10.1-RELEASE-p9) which is running for years
without any upgrades. Now I want to install a simple port (trafshow, to
see what's going on).
It first want to upgrade pkg from 1.5.1 to 1.10.0_2 but that doesn't work:
[1/1] Upgrading pkg from 1.5.1 to 1.10.0_2...
[1/1] Ext
On 03/10/17 14:26, Hans de Hartog wrote:
I have an old web server (10.1-RELEASE-p9) which is running for years
without any upgrades. Now I want to install a simple port (trafshow, to
see what's going on).
It first want to upgrade pkg from 1.5.1 to 1.10.0_2 but that doesn't work:
[1/1] Upgradi
On 10/03/2017 14:26, Hans de Hartog wrote:
I have an old web server (10.1-RELEASE-p9) which is running for years
without any upgrades. Now I want to install a simple port (trafshow, to
see what's going on).
It first want to upgrade pkg from 1.5.1 to 1.10.0_2 but that doesn't work:
[1/1] Upgra
On 10/03/2017 14:47, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/10/17 14:26, Hans de Hartog wrote:
I have an old web server (10.1-RELEASE-p9) which is running for years
without any upgrades. Now I want to install a simple port (trafshow, to
see what's going on).
It first want to upgrade pkg from 1.5.1 to 1.10.
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 02:55:13PM +0100, Jan Bramkamp wrote:
> Among other
> things FreeBSD 10.3 added a bunch of new *at() system calls like openat.
> These *at() system calls are useful inside (capsicum) sandboxes. Your
> old 10.1 kernel lacks those systems calls and your old 10.1 libc lacks
On 10/03/2017 15:08, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 02:55:13PM +0100, Jan Bramkamp wrote:
Among other
things FreeBSD 10.3 added a bunch of new *at() system calls like openat.
These *at() system calls are useful inside (capsicum) sandboxes. Your
old 10.1 kernel lacks those sys
On 03/10/17 14:57, Jan Bramkamp wrote:
> On 10/03/2017 14:47, Guido Falsi wrote:
>> On 03/10/17 14:26, Hans de Hartog wrote:
>>> I have an old web server (10.1-RELEASE-p9) which is running for years
>>>
>>> without any upgrades. Now I want to install a simple port (trafshow, to
>>>
>>> see what's g
On Fri, 10 Mar 2017 10:50:39 +0100 Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> John Baldwin writes:
>> I wouldn't even mind if we had both /usr/local/man and /usr/local/share/man
>> so long as our default MANPATH included both if that means applying fewer
>> patches to ports.
>
> The default MANPATH is const
Hi!
> I have an old web server (10.1-RELEASE-p9) which is running for years
I had one with 9.3 something, and upgrading it from the pkg repo
took not a huge amount of time, yesterday evening...
So maybe upgrading is a good thing, if not too many fancy things
are active.
--
p...@opsec.eu
On 10/03/2017 17:04, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Hi!
I have an old web server (10.1-RELEASE-p9) which is running for years
I had one with 9.3 something, and upgrading it from the pkg repo
took not a huge amount of time, yesterday evening...
So maybe upgrading is a good thing, if not too many fancy th
On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 00:56:10 +0100 Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> My proposal is to add to the manpath /usr/local/share/man in default
> man(1) command in FreeBSD 12 (MFCed to 11-STABLE)
>
> and either provide an errata for 11.0/10.3 or a
> /usr/local/etc/man.d/something.conf via a port or something
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 05:03:08PM +0100, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Mar 2017 10:50:39 +0100 Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> > John Baldwin writes:
> >> I wouldn't even mind if we had both /usr/local/man and /usr/local/share/man
> >> so long as our default MANPATH included both if that means
On Fri, 10 Mar 2017 08:38:30 -0800 Steve Kargl
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 05:03:08PM +0100, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
>> On Fri, 10 Mar 2017 10:50:39 +0100 Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
>>> John Baldwin writes:
I wouldn't even mind if we had both /usr/local/man and /usr/local/share/man
On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:34:45 + Matthew Seaman wrote
> On 2017/03/08 16:04, Bob Willcox wrote:
> > Note that I haven't tried ver 52 of firefox, but from what I've read it
> > sounds like all plugins/addons other than flash are no longer supported.
I think the answer to your question can be answ
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 02:57:32PM +0100, Jan Bramkamp wrote:
> On 10/03/2017 14:47, Guido Falsi wrote:
> > On 03/10/17 14:26, Hans de Hartog wrote:
> >> I have an old web server (10.1-RELEASE-p9) which is running for years
> >> without any upgrades. Now I want to install a simple port (trafshow,
Am Tue, 07 Mar 2017 13:42:02 +0900 (JST)
Masachika ISHIZUKA schrieb:
> My Dell XPS12 (9Q33, Corei7-4500U, haswell) is working well with
> xf86-video-intel-2.99.917.20170228 (sna) without kld_list="i915kms".
>
> Issue for both r435512(2.99.917.20170228) and r433863(2.99.917.20170103)
> is not
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 10:50:39AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> John Baldwin writes:
> > I wouldn't even mind if we had both /usr/local/man and /usr/local/share/man
> > so long as our default MANPATH included both if that means applying fewer
> > patches to ports.
>
> The default MANPATH i
21 matches
Mail list logo
