There is a new version of duplicity out 0.7.11.
https://launchpad.net/duplicity
It fixes a bug where the b2-backend will stop working this week when the
company backblaze update their api.
Thank you for your great work with the ports collection! I'm using FreeNAS,
and it is by far the best NAS I
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 10:46:05AM +0100, Mikael Moutakis wrote:
> There is a new version of duplicity out 0.7.11.
> https://launchpad.net/duplicity
>
> It fixes a bug where the b2-backend will stop working this week when the
> company backblaze update their api.
>
> Thank you for your great work
On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 15:11:30 +1100 (EST) Dave Horsfall
wrote:
>>> What is the output of "pkg which /usr/local/lib/libiconv.la"?
>>
>> Not found; I sense a generic approach to any more errors of this type :-)
>
> Removed as suggested (along with libxslt) as nothing claimed to be using
> it, now
Hi,
pecl-memcached has been updated in the ports tree from 2.2.0.5 to 3.0.1
however 3+ version is for PHP7 only,
An IGNORE notice is in the Makefile,
we'll all be on php7 sometime, but as PHP56 is still in security release
should v3 be a seperate port to avoid v2 generating update alerts via
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 9:11 PM, Paul Macdonald wrote:
> Hi,
>
> pecl-memcached has been updated in the ports tree from 2.2.0.5 to 3.0.1
>
> however 3+ version is for PHP7 only,
>
> An IGNORE notice is in the Makefile,
>
> we'll all be on php7 sometime, but as PHP56 is still in security release
>
On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 13:11:09 -, Paul Macdonald wrote:
pecl-memcached has been updated in the ports tree from 2.2.0.5 to 3.0.1
however 3+ version is for PHP7 only,
An IGNORE notice is in the Makefile,
we'll all be on php7 sometime, but as PHP56 is still in security release
should v3 be
Hi All,
Could I get a committer to apply my latest update patch for net-mgmt/
prometheus? Patch is available here:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216973
Thanks so much,
-Jev
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.fre
Occasionally we’re called to account for our decisions, reflect upon their
correctness and at times reverse the decision.
John Marino (John) has conducted himself with a passion for making
decisions in the interests of ports' users over many years with great
professionalism and enthusiasm. At
Hi!
Thank you for your post, and for asking this question:
[About John Marino]
> At the very least we should know why, and by what criteria he is judged?
We all hope that this is explained in more detail, the sooner the better.
And thank you for also asking all the other questions.
--
p...@op
On 2/14/2017 12:50 PM, Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=433827
I think that commit message combined with
https://www.freebsd.org/internal/code-of-conduct.html is enough.
>
> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=433856
This comm
On Wed, 15 Feb 2017 07:50:46 +1100 Dewayne Geraghty
wrote
> Occasionally we’re called to account for our decisions, reflect upon their
> correctness and at times reverse the decision.
>
>
>
> John Marino (John) has conducted himself with a passion for making
> decisions in the interests of por
> On 14 Feb 2017, at 22:16, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>
>> On 2/14/2017 12:50 PM, Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
>> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=433827
>
> I think that commit message combined with
> https://www.freebsd.org/internal/code-of-conduct.html is enough.
The commit me
On 2/14/2017 2:58 PM, Michael Gmelin wrote:
>> On 14 Feb 2017, at 22:16, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>>> On 2/14/2017 12:50 PM, Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
>>> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=433827
>> I think that commit message combined with
>> https://www.freebsd.org/internal/code-
> On 15 Feb 2017, at 00:15, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>
> On 2/14/2017 2:58 PM, Michael Gmelin wrote:
On 14 Feb 2017, at 22:16, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 2/14/2017 12:50 PM, Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=433827
>>> I think that commit m
Well, almost; just a few rough edges to smooth over.
Background: after upgrading to 10.3 from 9.3, I then attacked the
long-neglected ports area. Now, I sort of inherited this installation,
and having an engineering background i.e. "if it ain't broke, don't fix
it". Just so you know where I c
Hi,
After recent update of xorg-server, the new xorg-server segfaults.
I'm using FreeBSD in VirtualBox so the video driver is vboxvideo.
I've already rebuilt virtualbox-ose-additions.
What can I do? I attach the xorg log.
--
`whois vmeta.jp | nkf -w`
meta [180360.851]
X.Org X Server 1.18.4
Rel
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 02:54:50AM +, Koichiro IWAO wrote:
> [180361.824] (EE) Backtrace:
> [180361.836] (EE) 0: /usr/local/bin/Xorg (OsInit+0x38a) [0x5abfca]
> [180361.846] (EE) 1: /lib/libthr.so.3 (_pthread_sigmask+0x50d) [0x802989bbd]
> [180361.857] (EE) 2: /lib/libthr.so.3 (_pthread_getspec
Konstantin,
Deinstalling llvm37 helped, thanks!
--
`whois vmeta.jp | nkf -w`
meta
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.o
Konstantin,
Deinstalling llvm37 helped, thanks!
P.S.
I actually deinstalled all older versions of llvm, llvm36, llvm37.
--
`whois vmeta.jp | nkf -w`
meta
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-
19 matches
Mail list logo
