Re: WIP: lang/php71

2017-01-26 Thread Torsten Zuehlsdorff
On 24.01.2017 05:41, Ganbold Tsagaankhuu wrote: On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 7:19 PM, Torsten Zuehlsdorff mailto:mailingli...@toco-domains.de>> wrote: Aloha, yesterday PHP 7.1 was released. I upgraded my dev-repo for interested users. What is the status of PHP 7.1? When will we have it

Re: FreeBSD Port: emacs25-25.1,3

2017-01-26 Thread Ashish SHUKLA
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 15:16:01 -0800, "Joel F Rodriguez" said: | Hi, | I completed a FREEBSD upgrade to 10.3-release and about midway through the 3 | day process I lost emacs. | I've rebuilt everything, but I still get this error: | gmake[4]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/editors/emacs/

Re: hard links in llvm39 and binutils

2017-01-26 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:54:27PM -0800, john--- via freebsd-ports wrote: > Both llvm39 and binutils failed to install recently because they both have > hard links that cross directories. On this machine, those directories, both > in /usr/local on on different zfs filesystems. > > I've had this d

Failure to build x11/nvidia-driver-340 kmod in head @r312812

2017-01-26 Thread David Wolfskill
This is running: FreeBSD g1-252.catwhisker.org 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #236 r312749M/312749:1200020: Wed Jan 25 04:42:36 PST 2017 r...@g1-252.catwhisker.org:/common/S4/obj/usr/src/sys/CANARY amd64 after updating source to r312812, with ports (head) @432483. The issue arose durin

Nieuwe vacatures voor verkoper 2017-01-26

2017-01-26 Thread alert
___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

add two users to a group

2017-01-26 Thread Sergei Vyshenski
Hi, Some ports need to add two users to a group. Example. Server openxpki needs to communicate with web server via a socket. Socket has permissions as: srwxrwx--- 1 openxpki openxpki 0 Jan 20 11:00 openxpki.socket= For this to work, we need to add user ${WWWOWN} to the group openxpki, that

correct way of using autoreconf and automake

2017-01-26 Thread mokhi
Hi. I'm trying to port an application that uses 'configure.ac' and 'makefile.am' for its building. I used `USES= autoreconf` in my Makefile. When I test it with poudriere, It fails for incorrect syntax in configure script as it says[1] But the weird point (for me :D) is when I go into poudriere ja

Re: add two users to a group

2017-01-26 Thread Adam Weinberger
> On 26 Jan, 2017, at 6:29, Sergei Vyshenski wrote: > > Hi, > > Some ports need to add two users to a group. Example. Server openxpki needs > to communicate with web server via a socket. Socket has permissions as: > > srwxrwx--- 1 openxpki openxpki 0 Jan 20 11:00 openxpki.socket= > > For

Re: correct way of using autoreconf and automake

2017-01-26 Thread Jan Beich
mokhi writes: [...] > [1] ./configure: 7063: Syntax error: newline unexpected (expecting ")") > ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. Can you pass -w flag to poudriere bulk command then inspect the specific line? The error often originates from undefined macros provided by other packages

Re: correct way of using autoreconf and automake

2017-01-26 Thread mokhi
> Can you pass -w flag to poudriere bulk command then inspect the specific > line? My guess was correct, As I previously told, the generated `configure` script in first `make` run and in second, differs. > The error often originates from undefined macros provided by other packages > e.g., Yeah

Re: correct way of using autoreconf and automake

2017-01-26 Thread Jan Beich
mokhi writes: >> The error often originates from undefined macros provided by other packages >> e.g., > Yeah, as far as I understood, the `PKG_CHECK_MODULES` is not > translated to its definition in first run. > But the weird point for me is that why it will be corrected in second > run (inside

Re: correct way of using autoreconf and automake

2017-01-26 Thread mokhi
> poudriere only installs BUILD_DEPENDS for current package but a regular > build would also do so for any dependencies. Probably one of those pulls > devel/pkgconf (aka USES=pkgconfig) which is what provides PKG_CHECK_MODULES. Aha, yeah you're right! I mistakenly had pkgconfig:run in my Makefile

Re: hard links in llvm39 and binutils

2017-01-26 Thread john--- via freebsd-ports
In your message you wrote: > ... >On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:54:27PM -0800, john--- via freebsd-ports >wrote: > Both llvm39 and binutils failed to install recently because >they both have > hard links that cross directories. On this machine, >those directories, both > in /usr/local on on different

Re: unable to build java in poudriere

2017-01-26 Thread Julian Elischer
On 26/1/17 7:32 am, Ultima wrote: I just finished building openjdk8 with a fresh repo and it built just fine. poudriere bulk -p git -j 103amd64 java/openjdk8 ref: https://poudriere.ultimasbox.com/build.html?mastername=103amd64-git&build=2017-01-25_14h51m15s yeah but not so for me.. remember

Re: unable to build java in poudriere

2017-01-26 Thread olli hauer
On 2017-01-26 19:21, Julian Elischer wrote: > On 26/1/17 7:32 am, Ultima wrote: >> I just finished building openjdk8 with a fresh repo and it built just fine. >> >> poudriere bulk -p git -j 103amd64 java/openjdk8 >> ref: >> https://poudriere.ultimasbox.com/build.html?mastername=103amd64-git&build

Re: hard links in llvm39 and binutils

2017-01-26 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:18:19AM -0800, j...@theusgroup.com wrote: > In your message you wrote: > > ... > >On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:54:27PM -0800, john--- via freebsd-ports > >wrote: > Both llvm39 and binutils failed to install recently because > >they both have > hard links that cross director