FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you

Re: 11.0-RC1 unsupported by ports?

Hi! > > 11.0-RC1 was superseded by 11.0-REL, so while that message is a bit > > drastic, there's a point to it. > > With that argument only the latest version would be supported. https://www.freebsd.org/releases/ lists the supported releases. There are no release candidates listed. > That said,

Re: 11.0-RC1 unsupported by ports?

On 2017-Jan-24, at 11:55 PM, Bernd Walter wrote: On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 07:20:45AM +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > >>> [61]cnc# make install >>> /!\ ERROR: /!\ >>> >>> Ports Collection support for your FreeBSD version has ended, and no ports >>> are >>> guaranteed to build on this system.

Re: devel/cargo build failure

On 01/25/2017 01:53 AM, Don Zavitz wrote: www/firefox pulls this in, didn't know firefox used rust? Yes, some parts of Firefox are now written in Rust :) -- David Demelier ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/l

Re: 11.0-RC1 unsupported by ports?

Hi!! Mark wrote: > In the run-up to a release, a number of -BETA and -RC releases may be > published for testing purposes. These releases are only supported for a few > weeks, as resources permit, and will not be listed as supported on this page. > Users are strongly discouraged from running th

Re: 11.0-RC1 unsupported by ports?

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 09:13:18AM +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > > > 11.0-RC1 was superseded by 11.0-REL, so while that message is a bit > > > drastic, there's a point to it. > > > > With that argument only the latest version would be supported. > > https://www.freebsd.org/releases/ lists

Re: VirtualBox port not working with USB

On 25/01/2017 00:43, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: On 01/24/17 12:03, Graham Menhennitt wrote: On 24/01/2017 04:19, Alfred Perlstein wrote: Graham, can you follow what Hans is asking and report back please? On Jan 23, 2017, at 8:14 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: There hasn't been any big cha

FreeBSD Port: neo4j-3.0.4_1

Hello, After install and trying to run, I got: eval: /usr/local/libexec/neo4j: Permission denied This directory has owner root and no other messagess is shown. Thank you Radek Odesláno z aplikace Pošta pro Windows 10 __

Re: 11.0-RC1 unsupported by ports?

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 09:33:46AM +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi!! > > Mark wrote: > > In the run-up to a release, a number of -BETA and -RC releases may be > > published for testing purposes. These releases are only supported for a few > > weeks, as resources permit, and will not be listed as

Re: 11.0-RC1 unsupported by ports?

> On 25 Jan 2017, at 10:47, Bernd Walter wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 09:13:18AM +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote: >> Hi! >> 11.0-RC1 was superseded by 11.0-REL, so while that message is a bit drastic, there's a point to it. >>> >>> With that argument only the latest version would be s

Re: FreeBSD Port: neo4j-3.0.4_1

Hey, I guess your Java is working? # chmod +x /usr/local/libexec/neo4j Try that? Should be done by the package. Cheers, Chris On 25 January 2017 09:35:48 GMT+00:00, "Radek Krejča" wrote: >Hello, > >After install and trying to run, I got: > >eval: /usr/local/libexec/neo4j: Permission denied

RE: FreeBSD Port: neo4j-3.0.4_1

Hi, total 23204 drwxr-xr-x 7 root wheel 512 Jan 25 10:16 . drwxr-xr-x 16 root wheel 512 Dec 30 00:56 .. drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 5632 Jan 4 16:33 apache24 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Dec 30 00:51 elasticsearch drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 6656 Nov 11 08:41 git-

Re: unable to build java in poudriere

On 25/1/17 10:36 am, Ultima wrote: Sorry Julian but your details are kind of vague. Are you on head? I'm not sure when my last build for openjdk7 or 8 were but I have them built in my repo. Is there enough memory on the system building it? or is it limited? that is usually the culprit for the o

Re: devel/cargo build failure

Le 25/01/2017 à 01:53, Don Zavitz a écrit : > > > On 1/24/2017 4:20 PM, Fernando Herrero Carrón wrote: >> El 24 ene. 2017 9:18 p. m., "Mathieu Arnold" escribió: >> >> Le 24/01/2017 à 20:27, Fernando Herrero Carrón a écrit : >>> >>> El 24 ene. 2017 6:57 p. m., "Mathieu Arnold" >>

Re: 11.0-RC1 unsupported by ports?

Le 25/01/2017 à 08:55, Bernd Walter a écrit : > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 07:20:45AM +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote: >> Hi! >> >>> [61]cnc# make install >>> /!\ ERROR: /!\ >>> >>> Ports Collection support for your FreeBSD version has ended, and no ports >>> are >>> guaranteed to build on this system. Plea

Re: 11.0-RC1 unsupported by ports?

Le 25/01/2017 à 09:47, Bernd Walter a écrit : > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 09:13:18AM +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote: >> Hi! >> 11.0-RC1 was superseded by 11.0-REL, so while that message is a bit drastic, there's a point to it. >>> With that argument only the latest version would be supported. >>

Re: 11.0-RC1 unsupported by ports?

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:52:10AM +0200, Daniel Braniss wrote: > > > On 25 Jan 2017, at 10:47, Bernd Walter wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 09:13:18AM +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > >> Hi! > >> > 11.0-RC1 was superseded by 11.0-REL, so while that message is a bit > drastic, there

Re: unable to build java in poudriere

On 25/1/17 6:30 pm, Julian Elischer wrote: On 25/1/17 10:36 am, Ultima wrote: Sorry Julian but your details are kind of vague. Are you on head? I'm not sure when my last build for openjdk7 or 8 were but I have them built in my repo. Is there enough memory on the system building it? or is it li

Re: 11.0-RC1 unsupported by ports?

> On 25 Jan 2017, at 12:39, Bernd Walter wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:52:10AM +0200, Daniel Braniss wrote: >> >>> On 25 Jan 2017, at 10:47, Bernd Walter wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 09:13:18AM +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi! >> 11.0-RC1 was superseded by 11.0-R

Re: devel/cargo build failure

On 24.01.2017 18:57, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > So, I opened PR #216442 to see if the code that made this problem was > legacy or not, an exp-run will tell :-) Thank you for working on this! -- Jean-Sébastien Pédron signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: VirtualBox port not working with USB

On 01/25/17 10:00, Graham Menhennitt wrote: On 25/01/2017 00:43, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: On 01/24/17 12:03, Graham Menhennitt wrote: On 24/01/2017 04:19, Alfred Perlstein wrote: Graham, can you follow what Hans is asking and report back please? On Jan 23, 2017, at 8:14 AM, Hans Petter Se

Re: VirtualBox port not working with USB

On 01/25/17 20:41, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: Hi Graham, Can you try to replace the two attached files in /usr/ports/...virtualbox-ose/files and re-build. Can someone here interacting with the VBOX team make sure these patches gets pushed upstream? --HPS You might need to disable VBOX debugg

Re: VirtualBox port not working with USB

On 26/01/2017 06:41, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: On 01/25/17 10:00, Graham Menhennitt wrote: On 25/01/2017 00:43, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: On 01/24/17 12:03, Graham Menhennitt wrote: On 24/01/2017 04:19, Alfred Perlstein wrote: Graham, can you follow what Hans is asking and report back pleas

Re: VirtualBox port not working with USB

Nice! Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 25, 2017, at 12:15 PM, Graham Menhennitt > wrote: > >> On 26/01/2017 06:41, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: >>> On 01/25/17 10:00, Graham Menhennitt wrote: On 25/01/2017 00:43, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On 01/24/17 12:03, Graham Menhennitt wrote: >

Re: unable to build java in poudriere

I just finished building openjdk8 with a fresh repo and it built just fine. poudriere bulk -p git -j 103amd64 java/openjdk8 ref: https://poudriere.ultimasbox.com/build.html?mastername=103amd64-git&build=2017-01-25_14h51m15s A google search on the error suggests that it is most likely related to

Re: unable to build java in poudriere

On 25 Jan, Ultima wrote: > I just finished building openjdk8 with a fresh repo and it built just fine. > > poudriere bulk -p git -j 103amd64 java/openjdk8 > ref: > https://poudriere.ultimasbox.com/build.html?mastername=103amd64-git&build=2017-01-25_14h51m15s > > > > A google search on the error

hard links in llvm39 and binutils

Both llvm39 and binutils failed to install recently because they both have hard links that cross directories. On this machine, those directories, both in /usr/local on on different zfs filesystems. I've had this directory structure for several years without issue, so this use of hard links is new.