Hi,
Roman Bogorodskiy skrev:
>
> Author: novel
> Date: Tue Nov 15 15:48:18 2016
> New Revision: 426175
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/426175
>
> Log:
> security/libgpg-error: update to 1.25
>
> Modified:
> head/security/libgpg-error/Makefile
> head/security/libgpg-error
Hi!
I have some reviews waiting in Phabricator. They are all simple patches
to update ports to their latest release or fix a build failure. Could a
Ports committer review them please?
o Fix graphics/piglit build on FreeBSD 9.3
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D7779
o Update sysutils/rubygem-bosh
Herbert J. Skuhra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Roman Bogorodskiy skrev:
> >
> > Author: novel
> > Date: Tue Nov 15 15:48:18 2016
> > New Revision: 426175
> > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/426175
> >
> > Log:
> > security/libgpg-error: update to 1.25
> >
> > Modified:
> > head/secur
Roman Bogorodskiy skrev:
>
> Herbert J. Skuhra wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Roman Bogorodskiy skrev:
>> >
>> > Author: novel
>> > Date: Tue Nov 15 15:48:18 2016
>> > New Revision: 426175
>> > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/426175
>> >
>> > Log:
>> > security/libgpg-error: update to
Am 20.11.2016 um 02:00 schrieb Stefan Bethke :
> Am 18.11.2016 um 17:59 schrieb Steve Wills :
>> On 11/18/2016 10:35, Stefan Bethke wrote:
>>> I’m trying to create a port for Gitea
>>> (https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea).
Here’s my attempt at that port:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.
Hello,
I've assembled some patches for a port to upgrade it to a current
version (namely, mail/mailfront).
Though, this port requires that a dependent port is brought to a current
upstream version as well (namely, devel/bglibs).
Finally, there are a couple of other ports which depend on devel/bg
On Sun., 20 Nov. 2016 at 11:55 pm, Armin Gruner wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've assembled some patches for a port to upgrade it to a current
> version (namely, mail/mailfront).
>
> Though, this port requires that a dependent port is brought to a current
> upstream version as well (namely, devel/bglibs).
/usr/local/bin/imageindex
Can't use 'defined(@array)' (Maybe you should just omit the defined()?)
at /usr/local/bin/imageindex line 2389.
--
-
Alex.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
T
Hi Torsten,
Am 16.11.2016 um 09:36 schrieb Torsten Zuehlsdorff:
> It was already assigned to and processed by me. And a second ago
> committed. :)
>
sry, was maybe to fast here :)
> Can you please elaborate on this? I couldn't find any hints for a
> security issue. Or do you mean critical in sen
Hi!
> >>> I'm trying to create a port for Gitea
> >>> (https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea).
>
> Here's my attempt at that port:
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214688
Committed, thanks!
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 4 years to go !
_
Am 20.11.2016 um 18:35 schrieb Kurt Jaeger :
>
> Hi!
>
> I'm trying to create a port for Gitea
> (https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea).
>>
>> Here's my attempt at that port:
>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214688
>
> Committed, thanks!
Thank you for the super quick t
Just for fun I've tried compiling www/chromium on an RPI2 by simply adding
armv6
to the list of achitechtures. This is on -head from last night.
It got far enough to report:
In file included from ../../v8/src/base/accounting-allocator.cc:5:
In file included from ../../v8/src/base/accounting-all
Back before we had Bugzilla, I used to recommend separate submissions
for each port. But Bugzilla gives us a little more flexibility on
Cc:ing and tracking maintainers, so it is not as hard for us to deal
with now.
Having said that, I personally still have a slight preference for
individual PRs.
Hello everyone,
If there is a committer out there with a little time to spare, I would
be grateful if they would take a look here:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213656
Best regards,
Martin
--
All of the above.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 01:32:47PM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote:
> ...
> A correspondent pointed out
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214381 to me -- looks
> as if this mode of failure may be "expected" when /usr/local is a
> symlink to a file system other than the one where /usr
Hi,
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016, at 23:31, David Wolfskill wrote:
> Folks who have a symlink for /usr/local (or whatever $LOCALBASE
> expands to) and who rely on "make install" to install ports might
> want to take a look: I was a bit surprised at the number of affected
> ports. (Note that portmaster us
Is a binary available for Ruby? System is (currently) 9.3-RELEASE-p43
(soon to go to 10 when I get a new server one day). It's not possible to
compile the thing on my (minimal) box, as it keeps blowing away swap.
The only reason I need Ruby (I don't even know the language) is that it's
used b
I was wondering why the port which is now default is version 5.24-RC4
instead of 5.24.0? Perl 5.24.0 was released on 2016-05-09 (May 9th).
Even if RC4 and 5.24.0 have no code differences besides the versioning,
I fail to understand why you would not update the perl 5.24 port to use
the final re
+-+
devel/cdk | 5.0-20160131| 5.0-20161120
+-+
If any of the above results are invalid, please check the
19 matches
Mail list logo
