Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
David Demelier wrote:
> 2016-09-29 17:36 GMT+02:00 Mathieu Arnold :
> > Le 29/09/2016 à 17:03, Christian Weisgerber a écrit :
> >> On 2016-09-14, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> >>
> >>> Google Code has been deprecated[1] since March 2015, and read-only since
> >>> August 2015, giving time to software d
Le 01/10/2016 à 04:35, Julian Elischer a écrit :
> There is a need for a "minimum" install of a lot of packages.
Some dependencies are often optional, and can be unchecked by running
make config.
> Such a 'minimum' install should probably be the default when coming in
> as a dependency, as
> ther
Le 02/10/2016 à 21:07, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen a écrit :
> On 10/02/2016 10:29 AM, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen wrote:
>> I am trying to build the port graphics/opendx, and at the qa stage it says:
>>
>> Error: /usr/local/dx/bin_freebsd/builder is linked to
>> /usr/local/lib/libcdf.so which does not
On 10/02/2016 05:27 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 2 October 2016 at 14:44, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen
> wrote:
>> So I have a couple of ports, science/cdf and graphics/opendx, which have
>> licenses I can't find in Mk/bsd.licenses.db.mk. How do I set LICENSE in
>> those ports?
>
> The other answers
On 3 October 2016 at 05:31, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen
wrote:
> On 10/02/2016 05:27 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
>> On 2 October 2016 at 14:44, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen
>> wrote:
>>> So I have a couple of ports, science/cdf and graphics/opendx, which have
>>> licenses I can't find in Mk/bsd.licenses.db
On 03/10/2016 12:14, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
Le 01/10/2016 à 04:35, Julian Elischer a écrit :
There is a need for a "minimum" install of a lot of packages.
Some dependencies are often optional, and can be unchecked by running
make config.
Such a 'minimum' install should probably be the default
Grzegorz Junka wrote on 10/03/2016 15:11:
On 03/10/2016 12:14, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
Le 01/10/2016 à 04:35, Julian Elischer a écrit :
There is a need for a "minimum" install of a lot of packages.
Some dependencies are often optional, and can be unchecked by running
make config.
Such a 'mini
Le 03/10/2016 à 14:31, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen a écrit :
> On 10/02/2016 05:27 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
>> On 2 October 2016 at 14:44, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen
>> wrote:
>>> So I have a couple of ports, science/cdf and graphics/opendx, which have
>>> licenses I can't find in Mk/bsd.licenses.db.mk
On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 13:11:43 +
Grzegorz Junka wrote:
> Shouldn't all packages default to noX dependencies? If I am not mistaken
> FreeBSD is predominantly a server-side system, with X running only
> occasionally
I'd disagree with that. I don't know whether or not the majority of
FreeBSD ins
On 03/10/2016 14:11, Mike Clarke wrote:
On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 13:11:43 +
Grzegorz Junka wrote:
Shouldn't all packages default to noX dependencies? If I am not mistaken
FreeBSD is predominantly a server-side system, with X running only
occasionally
I'd disagree with that. I don't know whethe
Le 03/10/2016 à 16:29, Grzegorz Junka a écrit :
>
> On 03/10/2016 14:11, Mike Clarke wrote:
>> On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 13:11:43 +
>> Grzegorz Junka wrote:
>>
>>> Shouldn't all packages default to noX dependencies? If I am not
>>> mistaken
>>> FreeBSD is predominantly a server-side system, with X ru
On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 14:29:27 +
Grzegorz Junka wrote:
> On 03/10/2016 14:11, Mike Clarke wrote:
> > On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 13:11:43 +
> > Grzegorz Junka wrote:
> >
> >> Shouldn't all packages default to noX dependencies? If I am not mistaken
> >> FreeBSD is predominantly a server-side system,
Le 03/10/2016 à 16:57, Matthieu Volat a écrit :
> On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 14:29:27 +
> Grzegorz Junka wrote:
>
>> On 03/10/2016 14:11, Mike Clarke wrote:
>>> On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 13:11:43 +
>>> Grzegorz Junka wrote:
>>>
Shouldn't all packages default to noX dependencies? If I am not mistake
On 03/10/2016 14:48, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
Le 03/10/2016 à 16:29, Grzegorz Junka a écrit :
On 03/10/2016 14:11, Mike Clarke wrote:
On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 13:11:43 +
Grzegorz Junka wrote:
Shouldn't all packages default to noX dependencies? If I am not
mistaken
FreeBSD is predominantly a serv
Miroslav Lachman wrote on 10/03/2016 15:29:
Grzegorz Junka wrote on 10/03/2016 15:11:
On 03/10/2016 12:14, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
Le 01/10/2016 à 04:35, Julian Elischer a écrit :
There is a need for a "minimum" install of a lot of packages.
Some dependencies are often optional, and can be unc
Hi,
I noticed hand full of new dependencies after PORTREVISION bump to 4
because there is a new USE_XORG= x11
Is this really needed? Phantomjs worked for me for a long time without
any X11 libraries. We are always trying to keep our servers with minimum
ports installed. We have OPTIONS_
On Monday, 3 October 2016 at 14:14:13 +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> Le 01/10/2016 à 04:35, Julian Elischer a écrit :
>> Such a 'minimum' install should probably be the default when coming
>> in as a dependency, as there is an increasing tendency to configure
>> things with all the bells and whi
On 10/03/16 19:21, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Monday, 3 October 2016 at 14:14:13 +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
Le 01/10/2016 à 04:35, Julian Elischer a écrit :
Such a 'minimum' install should probably be the default when coming
in as a dependency, as there is an increasing tendency to con
On Monday, 3 October 2016 at 20:41:08 -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
>
> On 10/03/16 19:21, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>> On Monday, 3 October 2016 at 14:14:13 +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>>> Le 01/10/2016 à 04:35, Julian Elischer a écrit :
Such a 'minimum' install should probably be the default
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote on 10/04/2016 01:21:
[...]
Chromium? Opera? Emacs? Both OpenOffice and LibreOffice?
I don't know if this always happens, but there's an issue here. I
have a few unfinished thoughts about how it could occur, but so far
all I can confirm is that there is an issue.
On 10/03/2016 07:34 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 3 October 2016 at 05:31, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen
> wrote:
>> On 10/02/2016 05:27 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
>>> On 2 October 2016 at 14:44, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen
>>> wrote:
So I have a couple of ports, science/cdf and graphics/opendx, which h
On 3/10/2016 5:14 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
Le 01/10/2016 à 04:35, Julian Elischer a écrit :
There is a need for a "minimum" install of a lot of packages.
Some dependencies are often optional, and can be unchecked by running
make config.
but you can never really know the effect.
there should b
After some surgery, math/R is in more manageable shape. But, the surgery broke
two slave ports, math/libR and math/libRmath. They have each been marked
broken since June or July and I posted to ports@ about deleting them, but
didn't get a response.
math/libRmath
I'm not sure how widely used m
Assuming the binary upgrade from 9.3 to 10.3 is "clean" i.e. it won't
clobber any of my local stuff (this is my only FreeBSD server), what will
happen to the ports area? Left alone, saved, or overwritten with/without
any local chnages?
--
Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understan
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 7:29 PM, Dave Horsfall wrote:
> Assuming the binary upgrade from 9.3 to 10.3 is "clean" i.e. it won't
> clobber any of my local stuff (this is my only FreeBSD server), what will
> happen to the ports area? Left alone, saved, or overwritten with/without
> any local chnages?
Hi!
> > Right now, we build packages for
> > [9,10,11,12]x[amd64,i386]x[head,quarterly], that's 16 different sets,
> > and we mostly manage to build them over and over again, every two days.
> > Imagine how long it would take to build 320 sets.
> You are trying to take that into extreme to ridicu
Can someone look at these?
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212625
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213150
--
`whois vmeta.jp | nkf -w`
meta
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
On 04/10/2016 05:09, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Hi!
Right now, we build packages for
[9,10,11,12]x[amd64,i386]x[head,quarterly], that's 16 different sets,
and we mostly manage to build them over and over again, every two days.
Imagine how long it would take to build 320 sets.
You are trying to take t
Hi!
> > The problem is to add code to allow variants is complex and needs
> > engineering power.
> But regarding the
> changes that would be required to only allow other variants, why do you
> say it would be complex? Wouldn't that be only a change in pkg so that
> it can handle dependencies p
2016-10-04 4:59 GMT+02:00 Joseph Mingrone :
> After some surgery, math/R is in more manageable shape. But, the surgery
> broke two slave ports, math/libR and math/libRmath. They have each been
> marked broken since June or July and I posted to ports@ about deleting
> them, but didn't get a respo
31 matches
Mail list logo
