On 22 Aug 2016, at 08:26, Matthias Andree wrote:
>
> Am 18.08.2016 um 14:48 schrieb Dimitry Andric:
>> For example, on one of my systems, I now have these:
>>
>> /usr/local/lib/gcc47/libgcc_s.so.1
>> /usr/local/lib/gcc48/libgcc_s.so.1
>> /usr/local/lib/gcc49/libgcc_s.so.1
>> /usr/local/lib/gcc5/
On 21 Aug 2016, at 22:23, Mark Millard wrote:
>
> On armv6 (an rpi2) C++ by itself can have /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 not being
> sufficient, for example with g++6 being used:
>
>> # g++6 -std=c++14 -O2 cpp_clocks_investigation.cpp
>> # ldd a.out
>> a.out:
>>libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/g
Hello, FreeBSD community!
I've made a port of ufdbGuard - a fork of squidGuard compatible with
newer Squid versions.
Generally speaking it's an URL filter for Squid.
https://www.urlfilterdb.com/products/ufdbguard.html
If you're interested, please, review and/or test it. I'd appreciate
any kind of
I've installed, and then deleted and reinstalled, the package,
and finally built it from ports. Nothing works. Trying to load
some file to work on fails because of plugin error.
This is true for xpm, jpg, tif, gif, bmp, and png files. Every
plugin fails, the error message being the same, mutati
On 22 Aug, scratch65...@att.net wrote:
> I've installed, and then deleted and reinstalled, the package,
> and finally built it from ports. Nothing works. Trying to load
> some file to work on fails because of plugin error.
>
> This is true for xpm, jpg, tif, gif, bmp, and png files. Every
> plu
After some contact with LogZilla for use in my own company, we had a
conversation about the advantages of having an out-of-the-box LogZilla
installation for FreeBSD (either a port or a binary package). They asked
me to forward this:
LogZilla would like to speak to any FreeBSD experts who are inter
ports-committers is a *NEVER POST DIRECTLY TO* list, so, moving it to
ports@ where this belongs a lot more.
+--On 22 août 2016 20:30:15 +0200 Bernard Spil wrote:
| Curious to know how we should procede with the upgrade of the OpenSSL
| port to 1.1.0!
All ports need to work with it, I'm sure soft
On Mon, 2016-08-15 at 12:42 +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> Matthieu Volat wrote on 08/15/2016 07:53:
> >
> > On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 23:00:59 +0200
> > Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I upgraded ImageMagick-nox11: 6.9.4.3,1 -> 6.9.5.5_1,1 and found
> > > these
> > > new
Hi,
On 10/stable amd64, the recent fontconfig update makes the fonts used
in thunderbird, firefox, (u)xterm, and emacs quite a bit uglier. The
font strokes seem to be thicker and fuzzier. Emacs I fixed by
reinstalling bitstream-vera, but (u)xterm use that and they're still
broken. I ran fc-cac
Hi,
can I suggest replacing Bitstream Vera with DejaVu? Bitstream Vera fonts
have been unmaintained for more than 12 years and have a lot of hinting
issues, whereas DejaVu fonts are a very popular and well maintained fork
of them and have a very nice hinting. It might fix your issue and you
won't
10 matches
Mail list logo
