FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you

Re: Building www/node

Fix is comitted. https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=417063 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Thunderbird with Enigmail

Just checking here if anyone got this combo working, I have identical setups on Win and Horde Webmail working but on FreeBSD I only see: Error - no matching private/secret key found to decrypt message gpg: decryption failed: No secret key But there are keys and I can open them in both Enigmail

Re: Thunderbird with Enigmail

On 2016-06-18 16:50, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > Just checking here if anyone got this combo working, I have identical > setups on Win and Horde Webmail working but on FreeBSD I only see: > > Error - no matching private/secret key found to decrypt message > > gpg: decryption failed: No secret key

Why central builds are performed on 10.1 with broken/different compared to 10,3 compiler?

I regularly get the fallout messages for my net-im/ring-daemon port. It breaks on 10.1 with the c++11 -related message: In file included from /wrkdirs/usr/ports/net-im/ring-daemon/work/ring-daemon-56ec56f/src/manager.h:45: /wrkdirs/usr/ports/net-im/ring-daemon/work/ring-daemon-56ec56f/src/accou

Re: Why central builds are performed on 10.1 with broken/different compared to 10,3 compiler?

Hi! > There are two questions: > 1. Why clang36 works differently on 10.1 and 10.3? Good question. Additional patches went into 10.3, probably ? > 2. Should 10.3 be used for central builds then? For a major release, the ports are always build using the oldest supported minor release, because in

Re: Why central builds are performed on 10.1 with broken/different compared to 10,3 compiler?

On 06/18/2016 10:20, Kurt Jaeger wrote: >There are two questions: >1. Why clang36 works differently on 10.1 and 10.3? Good question. Additional patches went into 10.3, probably ? It looks like compiler on 10.1 is broken, because c++11 or c++14 isn't (fully) supported there. Now these fallout

INDEX build failed for 9.x

INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-9 - please wait.."/home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/math/libR/../R/Makefile", line 111: Could not find /home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/math/libR/compiler.mk fmake: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue ===> math/libR failed *** [describe.math] Erro

Re: Why central builds are performed on 10.1 with broken/different compared to 10,3 compiler?

On 06/18/16 19:35, Yuri wrote: > On 06/18/2016 10:20, Kurt Jaeger wrote: >>> >There are two questions: >>> >1. Why clang36 works differently on 10.1 and 10.3? >> Good question. Additional patches went into 10.3, probably ? > > > It looks like compiler on 10.1 is broken, because c++11 or c++14 isn

Re: Why central builds are performed on 10.1 with broken/different compared to 10,3 compiler?

On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Yuri wrote: > On 06/18/2016 10:20, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > >> >There are two questions: >>> >1. Why clang36 works differently on 10.1 and 10.3? >>> >> Good question. Additional patches went into 10.3, probably ? >> > > > It looks like compiler on 10.1 is broken, bec

INDEX now builds successfully on 9.x

___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"