El 1 mar. 2016 3:38 a. m., "Chris Inacio" escribió:
>
> All,
>
> I'm trying to build a port definition for a library/application that can
> optionally include Python bindings. The library/application generally
> depends on other C libraries to exist (ZMQ v3, Protobufs-C) and if you
> enable Pytho
On 01/03/2016 13:08, Chris Inacio wrote:
All,
I'm trying to build a port definition for a library/application that can
optionally include Python bindings. The library/application generally
depends on other C libraries to exist (ZMQ v3, Protobufs-C) and if you
enable Python support, then you nee
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 19:41:00 +0530
ash...@freebsd.org (Ashish SHUKLA) wrote:
> https://people.freebsd.org/~ashish/diffs/ejabberd-16.01-02.diff
> sha256 sum:
> ec71fdd19c752b22271ce6e3f899b966b0017f05fa13532d1decf18478e41b6e
Hi, Ashish,
I'd be glad to test this, but the patch does not apply clean
## Chris Inacio (nacho...@gmail.com):
> Happy if you would just reply with which one, if any, you use.
I'm using cfengine for a mixed (several Linux, some FreeBSD) environment.
But: without the "cfengine-masterfiles" (available as a port), using
cfengine can be somewhat painful (as already remark
Yay, great, thanks!!!
mail/postfix-current at 3.2-20160224
mail/postfix at 3.1.0
mail/postfix211 at 2.11.7
Mark
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "fre
\mail\postfix-XXX Older versions of Postfix
\mail\postfix-stableLatest stable version of Postfix
\mail\postfix-current Experimental version of Postfix
Based on the goal of user-friendliness and principle of least surprise
I'd vote for changing -current to -experimental. It is a Free
Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
Some systems (e.g. cfengine) are using a pull model, where the "managed"
machines connect to a central hub periodically, fetch the configuration
and "do what needs to be done", while e.g. ansible follows a "push"
model, where the "agent" is executed "somewhere"
On 1/03/2016 1:38 PM, Chris Inacio wrote:
> All,
>
> I'm trying to build a port definition for a library/application that can
> optionally include Python bindings. The library/application generally
> depends on other C libraries to exist (ZMQ v3, Protobufs-C) and if you
> enable Python support, t