FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2016-02-02 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you

pkg: fail to install packages from local file repository targeted via file:///

2016-02-02 Thread O. Hartmann
Using nanoBSDbuilding images for embedded systems and poudriere for the provision of ports, I run into a problem installing packages from the poudriere repository located on the same filesystem as the nanoBSD build. While installing the world and doing configuration steps in etc, I run into the e

Update net-p2p/btsync

2016-02-02 Thread Jerry
The ports version of net-p2p/btsync is "2.2.6". The latest released version for FreeBSD is "2.2.3" which includes several improvements. Is it possible that the ports version could be updated? Thanks ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://l

Re: Update net-p2p/btsync

2016-02-02 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > The ports version of net-p2p/btsync is "2.2.6". The latest released > version for FreeBSD is "2.2.3" which includes several improvements. > Is it possible that the ports version could be updated? Hmm, 2.2.3 < 2.2.6, so it's a downgrade, not an upgrade ? -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171

RE: Update net-p2p/btsync

2016-02-02 Thread Jerry
> > The ports version of net-p2p/btsync is "2.2.6". The latest released > > version for FreeBSD is "2.2.3" which includes several improvements. > > Is it possible that the ports version could be updated? > > Hmm, 2.2.3 < 2.2.6, so it's a downgrade, not an upgrade ? Sorry, meant "2.3" -- Jerry

Re: Update net-p2p/btsync

2016-02-02 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > > > The ports version of net-p2p/btsync is "2.2.6". The latest released > > > version for FreeBSD is "2.2.3" which includes several improvements. > > > Is it possible that the ports version could be updated? > > > > Hmm, 2.2.3 < 2.2.6, so it's a downgrade, not an upgrade ? > > Sorry, mean

Re: pkg: fail to install packages from local file repository targeted via file:///

2016-02-02 Thread Patrick Hess
O. Hartmann wrote: > file:///pool/poudriere/data/packages/head-amd64-head-default/meta.txz: No such > file or directory repository myrepo has no meta file, using default settings > pkg: > file:///pool/poudriere/data/packages/head-amd64-head-default/packagesite.txz: > No such file or directory Unabl

Re: Update net-p2p/btsync

2016-02-02 Thread Joshua Ruehlig
I believe the latest version is 2.3.0 it's been on my todo list to update the port but I haven't gotten to it yet. maybe tonight or later this week. On Feb 2, 2016 5:29 AM, "Kurt Jaeger" wrote: > Hi! > > > The ports version of net-p2p/btsync is "2.2.6". The latest released > > version for FreeBSD

RE: Update net-p2p/btsync

2016-02-02 Thread Jerry
> > > > The ports version of net-p2p/btsync is "2.2.6". The latest > > > > released version for FreeBSD is "2.2.3" which includes several > improvements. > > > > > Is it possible that the ports version could be updated? > > > > > > Hmm, 2.2.3 < 2.2.6, so it's a downgrade, not an upgrade ? > > > >

Re: Update net-p2p/btsync

2016-02-02 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > I believe the latest version is 2.3.0 > it's been on my todo list to update the port but I haven't gotten to it > yet. maybe tonight or later this week. See https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206859 for a suggested update to 2.3.1. Probably needs run-testing, if all works

Re: Update net-p2p/btsync

2016-02-02 Thread Joshua Ruehlig
great, hope to test it out tonight or soon after On Feb 2, 2016 11:45 AM, "Kurt Jaeger" wrote: > Hi! > > > I believe the latest version is 2.3.0 > > it's been on my todo list to update the port but I haven't gotten to it > > yet. maybe tonight or later this week. > > See > > https://bugs.freebsd.

Using pkg to fetch packages for different ABI

2016-02-02 Thread Daniel Eischen
I want to use pkg to maintain a set of packages for nanobsd systems that are a different OS version and ABI than the host system. Basically, I want to be able to do: # pkg fetch -d -r FreeBSD_10x_32 -o ./ and have it fetch all the required packages for . The host system is 10.2-RELEASE-p9 a

Re: Using pkg to fetch packages for different ABI

2016-02-02 Thread Jason Unovitch
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 8:21 PM, Daniel Eischen wrote: > I want to use pkg to maintain a set of packages for nanobsd > systems that are a different OS version and ABI than the > host system. Basically, I want to be able to do: > > # pkg fetch -d -r FreeBSD_10x_32 -o ./ > > and have it fetch all

Re: Using pkg to fetch packages for different ABI

2016-02-02 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Tue, 2 Feb 2016, Jason Unovitch wrote: On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 8:21 PM, Daniel Eischen wrote: I want to use pkg to maintain a set of packages for nanobsd systems that are a different OS version and ABI than the host system. Basically, I want to be able to do: # pkg fetch -d -r FreeBSD_10

Re: Using pkg to fetch packages for different ABI

2016-02-02 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 03/02/2016 03:37, Daniel Eischen wrote: > Interesting, that works. I would have thought setting it in > the repo.conf would have worked too, though. You'ld need to set ABI in pkg.conf rather than repo.conf > So, can I have one (1) repo.conf and use it for multiple ABIs, > like so?: > > $ c