FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2016-01-31 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you

Re: New port assistance for mlr

2016-01-31 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > > libtool: link: cc -g -pg -Wall -std=gnu99 -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector > > -fno-strict-aliasing -fstack-protector -o mlrp mlrp-mlrmain.o > > cli/.libs/libcli.a containers/.libs/libcontainers.a > > stream/.libs/libstream.a input/.libs/libinput.a mapping/.libs/libmapping.a > > output/.li

Re: New port assistance for mlr

2016-01-31 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! Have a look at https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206785 It's not building on 9, but otherwise it looks fine. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 4 years to go ! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing

Did pkg drop ftp support?

2016-01-31 Thread Helmut Schneider
Hi, url: "pkg+ftp://ftp.mysite/pub/FreeBSD/ports/${ABI}"; worked fine until ~2 weeks ago. Now I get an error message when running pkg: [helmut@BSDHelmut1064 ~]$ sudo pkg update pkg: invalid scheme pkg+ftp pkg: Cannot parse configuration file! [helmut@BSDHelmut1064 ~]$ Was ftp support dropped?

Re: Did pkg drop ftp support?

2016-01-31 Thread Tobias Kortkamp
There's a new option for limiting the number of valid URL schemes in pkg.conf. Running `pkg config VALID_URL_SCHEME` prints a list of valid URL schemes, but pkg+ftp is not a that list for me. Maybe an oversight? Unless you want to use SRV records on your domain, just using ftp:// and setting mirr

Re: Did pkg drop ftp support?

2016-01-31 Thread Helmut Schneider
Tobias Kortkamp wrote: > On Sun, Jan 31, 2016, at 03:46 PM, Helmut Schneider wrote: > > Hi, > > > > url: "pkg+ftp://ftp.mysite/pub/FreeBSD/ports/${ABI}"; > > > > worked fine until ~2 weeks ago. Now I get an error message when > > running pkg: > > > > [helmut@BSDHelmut1064 ~]$ sudo pkg update >

Re: Did pkg drop ftp support?

2016-01-31 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 31/01/2016 14:46, Helmut Schneider wrote: > Hi, > > url: "pkg+ftp://ftp.mysite/pub/FreeBSD/ports/${ABI}"; > > worked fine until ~2 weeks ago. Now I get an error message when running > pkg: > > [helmut@BSDHelmut1064 ~]$ sudo pkg update > pkg: invalid scheme pkg+ftp > pkg: Cannot parse configur

Re: Did pkg drop ftp support?

2016-01-31 Thread Dave Horsfall
And besides, FTP is a broken protocol, for those who care about security. -- Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security will suffer." ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-por

Re: New port assistance for mlr

2016-01-31 Thread jungle Boogie
Hi! On 31 January 2016 at 04:15, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > Have a look at > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206785 > > It's not building on 9, but otherwise it looks fine. Wow, thank you! Do I need to contact the maintainer and see why it won't build on 9? Do you have the

Re: New port assistance for mlr

2016-01-31 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > Do I need to contact the maintainer and see why it won't build on 9? The problem is that the port requires a recent flex, but 9.3 has an older version. So for 9.3 the makefiles need some patch to use the proper flex version. > Do you have the build log that I can show him? http://people.f

Re: New port assistance for mlr

2016-01-31 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > > The problem is that the port requires a recent flex, but 9.3 has > > an older version. [...] > I had a nearly similar problem with graphics/qgis. This way it works for me: > > .if ${OPSYS} == FreeBSD && ${OSVERSION} < 100 > BUILD_DEPENDS+= flex>=2.5.39:${PORTSDIR}/textproc/flex

Re: New port assistance for mlr

2016-01-31 Thread Rainer Hurling
Am 31.01.16 um 17:57 schrieb Kurt Jaeger: > Hi! > >> Do I need to contact the maintainer and see why it won't build on 9? > > The problem is that the port requires a recent flex, but 9.3 has > an older version. So for 9.3 the makefiles need some patch > to use the proper flex version. > >> Do yo

Re: Fritzing PORT

2016-01-31 Thread Patrick Hess
Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Project ERROR: Unknown module(s) in QT: xml printsupport concurrent Quick guess: Try adding these modules to USE_QT5 in the port's Makefile. Patrick ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listi

Re: opensmtpd / openssl 1.0.2_8 problem

2016-01-31 Thread Vitaly Magerya
On 01/29/16 22:00, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > On 2016-Jan-29, 19:29, Pietro Cerutti wrote: >> I got reproducible errors in opensmtpd since I upgrade OpenSSL to >> 1.0.2_8 today. 1.0.2_4 is fine. I'm bisecting versions right now. > > OpenSSL 1.0.2e works fine, 1.0.2f does not. > >> >> Anybody else go

Re: Fritzing PORT

2016-01-31 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > Kurt Jaeger wrote: > > Project ERROR: Unknown module(s) in QT: xml printsupport concurrent > > Quick guess: Try adding these modules to USE_QT5 in the port's Makefile. Yes, thanks. That solved that part, now it fails because the QT5 ports collection does not yet have a rcc port: /usr/loca

Re: Fritzing PORT

2016-01-31 Thread Patrick Hess
Kurt Jaeger wrote: > now it fails because the QT5 ports collection does not yet have a rcc port: In the transition from Qt 4 to 5, many of these packages were reorganized, and rcc has now found its place in qt5-buildtools. Patrick ___ freebsd-ports@fre

Re: Fritzing PORT

2016-01-31 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > Kurt Jaeger wrote: > > now it fails because the QT5 ports collection does not yet have a rcc port: > > In the transition from Qt 4 to 5, many of these packages were reorganized, > and rcc has now found its place in qt5-buildtools. Ah! On it! -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372

Re: opensmtpd / openssl 1.0.2_8 problem

2016-01-31 Thread BjörnSchümann
Vitaly Magerya gmail.com> writes: > > On 01/29/16 22:00, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > > On 2016-Jan-29, 19:29, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > >> I got reproducible errors in opensmtpd since I upgrade OpenSSL to > >> 1.0.2_8 today. 1.0.2_4 is fine. I'm bisecting versions right now. > > > > OpenSSL 1.0.2e wor

Re: opensmtpd / openssl 1.0.2_8 problem

2016-01-31 Thread Pietro Cerutti
On 31 Jan 2016, at 21:51, Vitaly Magerya wrote: > >> On 01/29/16 22:00, Pietro Cerutti wrote: >>> On 2016-Jan-29, 19:29, Pietro Cerutti wrote: >>> I got reproducible errors in opensmtpd since I upgrade OpenSSL to >>> 1.0.2_8 today. 1.0.2_4 is fine. I'm bisecting versions right now. >> >> OpenSSL