Re: java/eclipse (eclipse-4.5.1) does not build on 11-CURRENT amd64

2015-12-13 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Sunday, December 13, 2015 a las 06:22:42AM +0100, Matthias Apitz escribió: > I do not think that this is (at the moment) some bare metal resource > issue. I monitored in separate xterms with top the used memeory (most of > it only 'inactive', some megabytes free, swap unused) and a tail -f

Re: java/eclipse (eclipse-4.5.1) does not build on 11-CURRENT amd64

2015-12-13 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > > I can provide a build log if it helps ? > > Yes, please do so (off list, or put it somewhere where I could fetch > it); thanks. http://people.freebsd.org/~pi/logs/java__eclipse-cur-1449004593.txt -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! __

Re: Should poudriere skip (IGNORE) a port marked BROKEN?

2015-12-13 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! [ports marked BROKEN are build in poudriere and fail] > But poudriere goes ahead with the build, fails on the broken dependency, > and skips the port without printing or logging my helpful BROKEN message. > > Is this by design, or a flaw in my understanding or in poudriere's > implementation

Gogs port: A painless self-hosted Git service

2015-12-13 Thread Yuri
Some time back it was a discussion on this ML about how to best submit patches to FreeBSD ports and base system. One of the problems standing in the way of improvements was the lack of open source web software to manage public submissions. This problem is now addressed. I created a port for Gog

Re: java/eclipse (eclipse-4.5.1) does not build on 11-CURRENT amd64

2015-12-13 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Sunday, December 13, 2015 a las 09:17:46AM +0100, Kurt Jaeger escribió: > Hi! > > > > I can provide a build log if it helps ? > > > > Yes, please do so (off list, or put it somewhere where I could fetch > > it); thanks. > > http://people.freebsd.org/~pi/logs/java__eclipse-cur-1449004593.

Re: poudriere, Go and networking

2015-12-13 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 13/12/2015 05:01, Steve Wills wrote: >> Perhaps you should make a tool which takes a go project as input and a >> > FreeBSD package as output? > This is an interesting idea. It's a bit of work though and you're be > re-implementing pkg in go and chasing any changes it made. And I'm not > sure h

Re: poudriere, Go and networking

2015-12-13 Thread Yuri
On 12/11/2015 05:57, Piotr Florczyk wrote: Recently I had to package couple of programs written in Go and godep is becoming the standard for dependency tracking in Go projects. For example I currently had to package telegraf. Here is the thing. Poudriere disables networking after fetch phase and

Re: Gogs port: A painless self-hosted Git service

2015-12-13 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 13/12/2015 09:22, Yuri wrote: > Some time back it was a discussion on this ML about how to best submit > patches to FreeBSD ports and base system. > One of the problems standing in the way of improvements was the lack of > open source web software to manage public submissions. > > This problem

Re: Gogs port: A painless self-hosted Git service

2015-12-13 Thread Yuri
On 12/13/2015 03:49, Matthew Seaman wrote: The big advantage of being able to use pull requests on Github is that so many people who work on open source projects are already setup to use Github. They've already jumped through all the hoops necessary for them to be able to easily clone a repo, de

Re: Should poudriere skip (IGNORE) a port marked BROKEN?

2015-12-13 Thread John W. O'Brien
On 12/13/15 3:25 AM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > [ports marked BROKEN are build in poudriere and fail] > >> But poudriere goes ahead with the build, fails on the broken dependency, >> and skips the port without printing or logging my helpful BROKEN message. >> >> Is this by design, or a flaw in

Re: [Bug 205242] editors/libreoffice (5.0.3, r403255) does not build in poudriere on 11.0-CURRENT r276659

2015-12-13 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Friday, December 11, 2015 a las 10:46:18AM +, bugzilla-nore...@freebsd.org escribió: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205242 > > Bug ID: 205242 >Summary: editors/libreoffice (5.0.3, r403255) does not build in > poudriere o

Re: [Bug 205242] editors/libreoffice (5.0.3, r403255) does not build in poudriere on 11.0-CURRENT r276659

2015-12-13 Thread olli hauer
On 2015-12-13 17:20, Matthias Apitz wrote: > El día Friday, December 11, 2015 a las 10:46:18AM +, > bugzilla-nore...@freebsd.org escribió: > >> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205242 >> >> Bug ID: 205242 >>Summary: editors/libreoffice (5.0.3, r403255)

Re: [Bug 205242] editors/libreoffice (5.0.3, r403255) does not build in poudriere on 11.0-CURRENT r276659

2015-12-13 Thread Matthias Apitz
On Sunday, 13 December 2015 17:43:08 CET, olli hauer wrote: On 2015-12-13 17:20, Matthias Apitz wrote: The port build in poudriere stops at What is the best way with poudriere(!) to nail this down, because poudriere cleans the workspace? I will give it a try with # poudriere bulk -j freebsd

Re: [Bug 205242] editors/libreoffice (5.0.3, r403255) does not build in poudriere on 11.0-CURRENT r276659

2015-12-13 Thread Don Lewis
On 13 Dec, Matthias Apitz wrote: > El día Friday, December 11, 2015 a las 10:46:18AM +, > bugzilla-nore...@freebsd.org escribió: > >> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205242 >> >> Bug ID: 205242 >>Summary: editors/libreoffice (5.0.3, r403255) does not

Re: [Bug 205242] editors/libreoffice (5.0.3, r403255) does not build in poudriere on 11.0-CURRENT r276659

2015-12-13 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Sunday, December 13, 2015 a las 03:10:27PM -0800, Don Lewis escribió: > >> The port build in poudriere stops at the end after many hours with: > >> > >> [build LNK] StaticLibrary/libvclmain.a > >> [build LNK] Executable/gengal.bin > >> [build GAL] arrows > >> Work on gallery > >> 'file:///