Re: poudriere with custom packages

2015-07-17 Thread Mathieu Arnold
+--On 17 juillet 2015 16:32:16 +1000 Aristedes Maniatis wrote: | On 17/07/2015 3:59pm, Shane Ambler wrote: |> As long as the name you use for the port is unique, steps like portsnap |> or svn update should not remove it. I would still keep a copy elsewhere. | | Thanks for that. I'm doing exactl

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2015-07-17 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you

Building Latest links etc.

2015-07-17 Thread Bob Eager
This is the scenario. I build all packages locally (a number have special configs). This is done on one machine, which is then the repository for 'pkg install'. So far so good. I now want to update the ports. I see how to do this using portmaster, and how to generate packages on the package serve

Re: Building Latest links etc.

2015-07-17 Thread Patrick Hess
Bob Eager wrote: > I now want to update the ports. I see how to do this using portmaster, > and how to generate packages on the package server. > > But...how do I use portmaster on the 'slave' machines, using the > packages I built? Is there a particular reason why you want to use portmaster inste

Re: Building Latest links etc.

2015-07-17 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 2015/07/17 14:15, Bob Eager wrote: > This is the scenario. I build all packages locally (a number have > special configs). This is done on one machine, which is then the > repository for 'pkg install'. > > So far so good. > > I now want to update the ports. I see how to do this using portmaste

Re: Building Latest links etc.

2015-07-17 Thread Marko Cupać
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 14:15:12 +0100 Bob Eager wrote: > This is the scenario. I build all packages locally (a number have > special configs). This is done on one machine, which is then the > repository for 'pkg install'. > > So far so good. > > I now want to update the ports. I see how to do this

Re: NEW PORT for librdkafka

2015-07-17 Thread Ilya A. Arkhipov
Hi There, Will it enough: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201521 ? On 07.07.2015 16:19, Fernando Apesteguía wrote: El 07/07/2015 15:14, "xoan carlos via freebsd-ports" < freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> escribió: Hi im trying to create and submit a NEW PORT for librdkafka. It comp

Re: NEW PORT for librdkafka

2015-07-17 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > Will it enough: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201521 ? Builds on amd64, but fails to build on 10.1-i386 -- should it work on i386 ? Any ideas ? cc -MD -MP -g -O2 -fPIC -Wall -Werror -Wfloat-equal -Wpointer-arith -g -O2 -fPIC -Wall -Werror -Wfloat-equal -Wpointer-arith

Re: NEW PORT for librdkafka

2015-07-17 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > > Will it enough: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201521 ? > > Builds on amd64, but fails to build on 10.1-i386 -- should it > work on i386 ? Any ideas ? GH_TAGNAME= e3d984849a builds, changed the error to a warning. Should we commit this ? -- p...@opsec.eu