Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 21:39:39 -0700 (MST)
timp wrote:
> > Squid can use more than one cache directory, so it makes sense to
> > have the default cache directory as a sub-directory of squid/.
>
> Additional cache dirs can be created manually by user in /var/squid, I
> agree. Like /var/squid/cach
Ok, so you don't see the difference too, do you?
The point is get rid of dirs which we don't really need for this port,
and place cache to suitable dir which is made in base system for such
purposes.
Just for order. You think it's bad idea?
2015-07-15 14:08 GMT+03:00 freebsd-ports mailing list [vi
On 07/15/15 11:56, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
I'll try enabling IPv6 in the kernel to see if that makes any difference
and eventually I'll file a bug report.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201583
bye & Thanks
av.
___
freebsd
On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 04:25:56 -0700 (MST)
timp wrote:
> Ok, so you don't see the difference too, do you?
Actually I do see the difference - I think the current layout is
better. My point was that "I can't see any difference" isn't a good
argument for making disruptive change.
I think it's obvio
> > Ok, so you don't see the difference too, do you?
>
> Actually I do see the difference - I think the current layout is
> better. My point was that "I can't see any difference" isn't a good
> argument for making disruptive change.
>
>
> I think it's obvious that putting multiple caches unde
Hi,
cmake cannot be built in my poudriere setup. It always ends with the
same error (on FreeBSD 8.4 and 10.1)
[ 99%] Building CXX object Source/CMakeFiles/cpack.dir/CPack/cpack.cxx.o
Linking CXX executable ../bin/cpack
[ 99%] Built target cpack
Scanning dependencies of target ctest
[ 99%] Build
On 07/15/2015 10:57, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> Hi,
> cmake cannot be built in my poudriere setup. It always ends with the
> same error (on FreeBSD 8.4 and 10.1)
>
> [ 99%] Building CXX object Source/CMakeFiles/cpack.dir/CPack/cpack.cxx.o
> Linking CXX executable ../bin/cpack
> [ 99%] Built target c
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 7:33 AM, timp wrote:
> > > Ok, so you don't see the difference too, do you?
> >
> > Actually I do see the difference - I think the current layout is
> > better. My point was that "I can't see any difference" isn't a good
> > argument for making disruptive change.
> >
> >
>
Kris Moore wrote on 07/15/2015 17:27:
On 07/15/2015 10:57, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
The full log is here http://pastebin.com/5MxnT3K5
It worked two weeks ago without babel.
Now Sphinx (py27-Jinja2) requires Babel extension.
Is this intentional?
Miroslav Lachman
Yea, the update to sphinx
I have a custom built package which I'm building outside the FreeBSD ports
system (using pkg-create commands). How can I add that package to a poudriere
managed repository so that it appears in the package index and can be easily
installed like any other package?
Thanks for any help
Cheers
Ari
Trying to perform building a port, I receive on several ports I'm about to
propose a nasty, sticky error and I can not fathom where it is rooted. For one
proposed port, devel/ocl-icd, please refer to
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181244
which contains on the very last few com
12 matches
Mail list logo