The problem has nothing to do with proprietary drivers, etcetera but rather
the extremely fractured system of printing on non MS Windows based systems. I
have had extensive conversations with representatives from Brother and while
they do include PPD's and other assorted files for some of their pri
Why are you trying to replicate www/chromium logic instead of making
a slave of it?
Tom Pusateri writes:
> PORTVERSION=43.0.2357.65
> DISTVERSIONPREFIX= v
> DISTVERSIONSUFFIX= 1
According to the project's releases page 43.0.2357.65 ends in either
-atom or -atom-1, not just 1.
> r
On Jun 2, 2015 11:29 AM, "Stan Gammons" wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 2, 2015 11:13 AM, "Lowell Gilbert" <
freebsd-ports-lo...@be-well.ilk.org> wrote:
> >
> > Stan Gammons writes:
> >
> > > While trying to build a port that has Cairo as dependency,
> > > Cairo-1.12.18.tar.xz gives a SHA256 checksum error w
Hi,:- freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
My name is Lily Lang and I am Business Development Executive.
I would like to inform you that now you can hire dedicated staff from India
which would cost you low and increase your bottom line. The staff will work
dedicatedly on your projects 8 hours a day, 22 day
Since net/samba41 was updated to 4.1.18, it has been failing to build
in poudriere with MAKE_JOBS (when /usr/local/etc/poudriere.conf has
ALLOW_MAKE_JOBS_PACKAGES=samba*).
The issue is a stage-runaway (>> Killing runaway build after 7200
seconds with no output).
The failing poudriere logs for
> On Jun 3, 2015, at 4:08 AM, Jan Beich wrote:
>
> Why are you trying to replicate www/chromium logic instead of making
> a slave of it?
I didn’t know about slave ports. I don’t see much about them in the Porter’s
handbook. Any docs on them? I’ll gladly do this whatever is the best way.
>
>
> On Jun 3, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Tom Pusateri wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jun 3, 2015, at 4:08 AM, Jan Beich wrote:
>>
>> Why are you trying to replicate www/chromium logic instead of making
>> a slave of it?
>
> I didn’t know about slave ports. I don’t see much about them in the Porter’s
> handbook. An
Hi,
I just wondered by the same makefile leads to different results. Here
is the output of a 'make clean' from two machines/jails using the same
ports tree:
Outside a jail:
===> Cleaning for libiconv-1.14_8
===> Cleaning for gettext-tools-0.19.4
===> Cleaning for gettext-runtime-0.19.4
===>
On Thu, 4 Jun 2015 10:39:25 +0800 Erich Dollansky
wrote
> Hi,
>
> I just wondered by the same makefile leads to different results. Here
> is the output of a 'make clean' from two machines/jails using the same
> ports tree:
>
> Outside a jail:
>
> ===> Cleaning for libiconv-1.14_8
> ===> Clea
Hi,
On Wed, 03 Jun 2015 21:12:41 -0700
"Chris H" wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Jun 2015 10:39:25 +0800 Erich Dollansky
> wrote
>
> > I just wondered by the same makefile leads to different results.
> > Here is the output of a 'make clean' from two machines/jails using
> > the same ports tree:
> >
> >
>
10 matches
Mail list logo