On 23 Apr 2015, at 00:12, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
>
> While not as smooth as clicking a merge button in GitHub,
> this is a valid way to accept patches submitted via GitHub pull requests,
> and integrate them in our FreeBSD Subversion repo.
The merge button on GitHub does the wrong thing anyway (
Dear colleagues,
as anders@ temporarily stopped involving in a project some time ago, could
someone please take a look at
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188941#c0
?
Thanks!
--
Sincerely,
D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN]
[ FreeBSD com
Got your message via the webform, tried to reply and got:
This report relates to a message you sent with the following header fields:
Message-id: <553a7998.2090...@sorbs.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 19:12:56 +0200
From: Michelle Sullivan
To: portmas...@bsdforge.com
Subject: Re: [Webform
On Sat, 18 Apr 2015, the wise Marco Beishuizen wrote:
On Fri, 17 Apr 2015, the wise Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Can you send me the output of pkg -o DEBUG_LEVEL=4 autoremove?
Best regards,
Bapt
DBG(3)[51642]> Pkg: add a new reverse dependency origin: x11-fm/pcmanfm,
name: pcmanfm, version: 1
stable/10, amd64
ftp/curl failing has impressively large effects on the rest
of the package collection (in an unhappy way). I run a poudriere
bulk every night, updating the ports collection. I update
the stable source around the beginning of each month, and
things have been running smoothly for
Hi,
FreeBSD package build server informs about build failure for my port
devel/p5-B-C at
FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT amd64, OSVERSION: 1100070.
(This port builds fine on all stable FreeBSD versions.)
Poudriere log of FreeBSD package build server:
http://beefy4.isc.freebsd.org/data/head-amd64-default/p384
Hi,
A new version is out: 567
could you please upgrade the port?
Regards,
Dutchman01
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubsc
