On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 2:53 AM Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 06:36:52AM +, Henry Hu wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 4:19 PM Baptiste Daroussin
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > For pkg 1.5.0 we do plan to provide a default pkg.conf full of useful
> > > aliases,
> > >
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 10:19:10PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For pkg 1.5.0 we do plan to provide a default pkg.conf full of useful aliases,
> of course this is subjective, if you think you have added some useful aliases
> into your pkg.conf please share those so we can add them di
+--On 2 avril 2015 22:19:10 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin
wrote:
| Hi,
|
| For pkg 1.5.0 we do plan to provide a default pkg.conf full of useful
| aliases, of course this is subjective, if you think you have added some
| useful aliases into your pkg.conf please share those so we can add them
| directl
>> I just wanted to take the time to thank you for all the
>> work you've put into this.
>>
>> Thanks!
>
> Thanks much appreciated, I want to share that with vsevolod@ and az@ who also
> spent a lot of time working on it!
>
Indeed, HUGE THANKS for what you guys are doing with pkg - I cant wait
to
>
> Please test and report as much bugs as you can!
> We could be very grateful if regressions tests could be provided along with
> the
> bug reports :)
>
Mine just did something like that:
foobar# uname -a
FreeBSD foobar.org 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #0 r280994M: Thu
Apr 2 20:16:53 CES
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 02:35:43PM +0100, Big Lebowski wrote:
> >
> > Please test and report as much bugs as you can!
> > We could be very grateful if regressions tests could be provided along with
> > the
> > bug reports :)
> >
>
> Mine just did something like that:
>
> foobar# uname -a
> FreeB
+--On 2 avril 2015 10:13:34 -0700 Mel Pilgrim
wrote:
| On 2015-04-01 13:42, Mike Clarke wrote:
|> Where can I now obtain the revision number for the ports tree used for
|> the latest package build?
|>
|> Although the above method has worked in the past it's a bit of a bodge.
|> The ideal way woul
+--On 2 avril 2015 09:08:00 -0500 Mark Felder wrote:
| On Wed, Apr 1, 2015, at 16:21, Bryan Drewery wrote:
|> On 4/1/2015 3:59 PM, Yuri wrote:
|> > I found that packages produced by poudriere likely link with base
|> > openssl, while port make likely links with the port openssl.
|> > This is becau
+--On 3 avril 2015 05:46:45 + Ben Woods wrote:
| I am working on modifying a port, and was wondering how do I specify that
| selecting port option1 requires that option2 is also selected?
|
| Note that in my example it is perfectly acceptable to have option2
| selected without option1.
Thi
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For pkg 1.5.0 we do plan to provide a default pkg.conf full of useful
> aliases,
> of course this is subjective, if you think you have added some useful
> aliases
> into your pkg.conf please share those so we can add them directl
Hi!
I did install Blender 2.74 on my FreeBSD 10.1 (amd64) without a problem
but it doesn't want to start. When I run from terminal I got:
"blender
Two passes with the same argument (-alloca-hoisting) attempted to be
registered!
Writing: /tmp/blender.crash.txt
Segmentation fault (core dumped)"
I
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>
>
> +--On 3 avril 2015 05:46:45 + Ben Woods wrote:
> | I am working on modifying a port, and was wondering how do I specify that
> | selecting port option1 requires that option2 is also selected?
> |
> | Note that in my example it is p
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Craig Rodrigues
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Baptiste Daroussin
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > For pkg 1.5.0 we do plan to provide a default pkg.conf full of useful
> > aliases,
> > of course this is subjective, if you think you have added some useful
> >
On 4/2/2015 12:19 PM, Stefan Ehmann wrote:
> The following commands work as expected with poudriere 3.1.1:
>
> # poudriere jail -c -v 10.1-RELEASE -a amd64 -j 101amd64
> # poudriere bulk -j 10amd64 ports-mgmt/poudriere
>
>
> After upgrade to 3.1.2 it fails:
>
> # poudriere bulk -j 101amd64 port
I have just submitted a bug report which includes a patch to update abiword
to the latest upstream release version 3.0.1.
This fixes the issues you have identified in your email.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199156
I would be greatful if you could test this patch to the port
16 matches
Mail list logo
