dear sir:
i am very happy send email to you ,i hearing your messege from tradekey ,and
know your company purchase walnut and other goods .
now i will introduce our company ,our company main manufacture and export
agricultural products,for example (walnut ,and walnut kerent ,dried
persimmon,sh
My latest nightly "make index" died at:
--- describe.print ---
make[5]: "/usr/ports/print/fontforge/Makefile" line 61: Unassociated shell
command "ftp://ftp.freetype.org/freetype/freetype2/:freetype";
make[5]: Fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue===> print/fontforge failed
*** [describe.pri
On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 18:37:37 -0700, Doug Hardie stated:
>Some of us don’t use the ports version of openssl because of the issues with
>v1.xxx.
What specific issue?
--
Jerry
pgpckEj8vNeP7.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015, at 16:21, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 4/1/2015 3:59 PM, Yuri wrote:
> > I found that packages produced by poudriere likely link with base
> > openssl, while port make likely links with the port openssl.
> > This is because of the lines in bsd.openssl.mk which check for the
> >
On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 21:03:23 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin wrote
> Hi all,
>
> We just released pkg 1.5.0 beta1 (in ports-mgmt/pkg-devel),
>
..
> Please test and report as much bugs as you can!
> We could be very grateful if regressions tests could be provided along with
> the bug reports :)
>
> Pl
On 2015-04-01 13:42, Mike Clarke wrote:
Where can I now obtain the revision number for the ports tree used for the
latest
package build?
Although the above method has worked in the past it's a bit of a bodge. The
ideal
way would be if this information could be accessed directly from the releva
The following commands work as expected with poudriere 3.1.1:
# poudriere jail -c -v 10.1-RELEASE -a amd64 -j 101amd64
# poudriere bulk -j 10amd64 ports-mgmt/poudriere
After upgrade to 3.1.2 it fails:
# poudriere bulk -j 101amd64 ports-mgmt/poudriere
[00:00:00] >> Creating the reference
j
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 7:21 PM, cpet wrote:
> On 2015-02-28 07:21, Amit Sengupta wrote:
>
>> Hi Chris,
>>
>> I have been using Enlightenment for a while now and I do like it the best
>> of all Window Managers. However as you already know it has some quirks, so
>> it would be great if someone tak
On 4/2/2015 12:19 PM, Stefan Ehmann wrote:
> The following commands work as expected with poudriere 3.1.1:
>
> # poudriere jail -c -v 10.1-RELEASE -a amd64 -j 101amd64
> # poudriere bulk -j 10amd64 ports-mgmt/poudriere
>
>
> After upgrade to 3.1.2 it fails:
>
> # poudriere bulk -j 101amd64 port
On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 07:21:19AM -0700, Chris H wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 21:03:23 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin wrote
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We just released pkg 1.5.0 beta1 (in ports-mgmt/pkg-devel),
> >
> ..
> > Please test and report as much bugs as you can!
> > We could be very grateful if
Hi,
For pkg 1.5.0 we do plan to provide a default pkg.conf full of useful aliases,
of course this is subjective, if you think you have added some useful aliases
into your pkg.conf please share those so we can add them directly into the next
release.
Best regards,
Bapt
pgp97EFvLxZTn.pgp
Descript
> On Mar 27, 2015, at 6:06 PM, Roland van Laar wrote:
>
> On 27-03-15 23:02, Dan Langille wrote:
>>> On Mar 27, 2015, at 5:58 PM, Roland van Laar wrote:
>>>
>>> On 27-03-15 22:56, Roland van Laar wrote:
On 27-03-15 22:39, Dan Langille wrote:
>> On Mar 27, 2015, at 5:36 PM, Roland van
Hallo !!
handbrake-0.10-1 fails to compile (it seems on all systems)
with this error message:
../contrib/ffmpeg/module.rules:2: recipe for target
'contrib/ffmpeg/.stamp.configure' failed
gmake[1]: *** [contrib/ffmpeg/.stamp.configure] Error 1
gmake[1]: Leaving directory
'/wrkdirs/usr/ports/multi
I am working on modifying a port, and was wondering how do I specify that
selecting port option1 requires that option2 is also selected?
Note that in my example it is perfectly acceptable to have option2 selected
without option1.
Thanks in advance,
Ben
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 4:19 PM Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For pkg 1.5.0 we do plan to provide a default pkg.conf full of useful
> aliases,
> of course this is subjective, if you think you have added some useful
> aliases
> into your pkg.conf please share those so we can add them directly
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 06:36:52AM +, Henry Hu wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 4:19 PM Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > For pkg 1.5.0 we do plan to provide a default pkg.conf full of useful
> > aliases,
> > of course this is subjective, if you think you have added some useful
> > a
16 matches
Mail list logo
